A. Rozany Nurmanaf
Peneliti pada Pusat Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian, Bogor

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Pengentasan Kemiskinan: Upaya yang Telah dilakukan dan Rencana Waktu Mendatang Valeriana Darwis; A. Rozany Nurmanaf
Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 19, No 1 (2001): Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi
Publisher : Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21082/fae.v19n1.2001.55-67

Abstract

EnglishDue to the extended economic crisis, the number of people living in poverty, which have been in decline, has risen again sharply. Many poverty-alleviation efforts have been implemented to assist people which have been worst affected by the crisis. However, the efforts have encountered various constraints in the field, reducing their effectiveness. This is in part because the efforts have been based on inaccurate information/data. Therefore, for the future, there is a need to revise and make more realistic plans. Future plans and or policies should be made more effective and targeted to improve the lives of the poor. IndonesianAkibat terjadi krisis ekonomi yang berkepanjangan, jumlah penduduk miskin yang telah berhasil ditekan, kembali meningkat dengan cepat. Upaya-upaya pengentasan kemiskinan memang telah banyak dilakukan terutama untuk membantu anggota masyarakat  yang terpuruk akibat krisis. Akan tetapi, di lapangan masih di temukan berbagai hambatan yang mengakibatkan program yang di laksanakan tidak berjalan secara optimal. Hal ini disebabkan antara lain perencanaan yang tidak sepenuhnya didasarkan pada informasi/ data yang akurat. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan perencanaan ulang yang lebih realistis. Dengan demikian, pelaksanaan program serupa di masa mendatang dapat diharapkan lebih efektif dan membuahkan hasil yang mampu memperbaiki nasib masyarakat miskin.
PERANAN SEKTOR NON PERTANIAN TERHADAP PENDAPATAN RUMAH TANGGA PETANI BERLAHAN SEMPIT A. ROZANY NURMANAF
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 4, No. 3 November2004
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (66.908 KB)

Abstract

The objective of study is to identify non agricultural sector role on householdincome sources of small sized cultivating farmers. By direct interview, data collectedin covering househld income structure by elevation, agroecosystem and accessibilityof the region. Analysis shows that the role of non agricultural sector is dominant inlow land area with the agroecosystem paddy field which has a good physicalaccessibility. Although the activities in the region vary, the important contribution onhousehold income are limited just on several activities, like trading, non agriculturallabour and money sending from the household member who work outside of theregion. That’s why household income in this area, dominantly supported by theactivities which have skill and capital. On the other hand, in high land area withagroecosystem of dry land and bad accessibility, non agricultural activities arelimited. Household income of small sized cultivating farmers are dominated by thecontribution of agricultural sector activities which include paddy field farming system,dry land farming system, agricultural labour and livestock farming system. As asource of income, non agricultural activities are limited, just came from the activitieswhich have low labour productivity. Consequently, income level of society in theregion are lower.
AKTIVITAS DAN SUMBER PENDAPATAN PETANI MISKIN BERLAHAN SEMPIT DI DAERAH SAWAH TADAH HUJAN DATARAN RENDAH (Kasus: Dua Desa di Kabupaten Bojonegoro ) VALERIANA DARWIS; A. ROZANY NURMANAF
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 4, No. 3 November2004
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (97.24 KB)

Abstract

There were several criteria that stick on a poor family, which are law educational level, thebiggest proportion of their income from the farming activity and the small farm landownership. Commonly the poor farm household in the study location owned a plot of rainfedand a plot of upland which avarage about 0.279 ha and 0.2 ha. The cropping patern on rainfedwas rice and secondary crops was tobacco. By existing planted area their minimal livingrequirement mostly couldn’t be fulfilled and needed other sources. Income from farmingactivity in the last year was 42.77 percent and the other 57.23 percent came from nonagricultural sector. Although allocated time was greater in farming activity, however theincome was lower than from non agricultural https://www.budidayatani.com. To alleviate poverty mainly of those smallscale farmer, an increasing water resourse was required in order to increase land productivity.Besides, quidance of farming technology practices and support were require sector.
KARAKTERISTIK RUMAH TANGGA PETANI BERLAHAN SEMPIT: STRUKTUR DAN STABILITAS PENDAPATAN DI WILAYAH BERBASIS LAHAN SAWAH TADAH HUJAN (Kasus di Propinsi Jawa Tengah dan Jawa Timur) A. ROZANY NURMANAF
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 3, No. 2 Juli 2003
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (65.548 KB)

Abstract

The aim of the study is to identify the structure and stability household income ofsmall size land holding farmers in the region where rain fed is the basic. Information abouthousehold characteristics is collected included sources of income and several factors relatedto the low-income level and instability of income. The study show that non agriculturalincome activity is the important source of household income, especially of small size landholding farmers who live in the rain fed (paddy field) area. Agricultural sector activities aredominance in the location, which has bad accessibility; but non-agricultural sector activitiesare dominance in the location with good accessibility. Level of income is higher in the lowland area with good accessibility, which supported by higher productivity of production factor.Household income in high land area is more fluctuate because most of their income camefrom seasonal activities. On the other hand, in low land area, household income morestables because most of their income came from regular income in short period of time.Thus, the application of program in the future should be oriented not only in increasinghousehold income but increasing income stability as well.
PENINGKATAN PENDAPATAN MASYARAKAT PEDESAAN DALAM HUBUNGANNYA DENGAN DISTRIBUSI ANTAR RUMAH TANGGA A. ROZANY NURMANAF
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 5, No. 3 November 2005
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (104.446 KB)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to show interrelation between the level ofdevelopment successful and income distribution inequality among households.By using Patanas data 1999 especially the information that covered householdincome aspect, this study identify the shape of relationship between twoparameters these are the skewness of household income distribution thatis measured by Gini Index value and level of income that is calculatedin income per head. Based on the village analysis unit, the discussionfocused on the shape of the two in order to examine Kuznets hypothesisthat represent by U-shape pattern. The analysis of study verified thatthe relationship support the hypothesis. It means, increasing in householdincome followed by increasing in household income distribution skewnessespecially in the beginning of development phase; but this tendency changein opposite way in next development phase. While, the level of incomedistribution skewness have positive correlation with three income factors,these are distribution of agricultural income, distribution of householdmember education level and distribution of agricultural land holding.Besides, the distribution of agricultural income is affected by the distributionof agricultural land holding, especially in the area where agriculturalsector has a higher contribution on the economy of society.
PERANAN SEKTOR LUAR PERTANIAN TERHADAP KESEMPATAN KERJA DAN PENDAPATAN DI PEDESAAN BERBASIS LAHAN KERING A. ROZANY NURMANAF
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 6, No. 3 November 2006
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (83.707 KB)

Abstract

Work opportunity and household income are two important indicators in village economicdevelopment. The purpose of analysis focuses in identifying non agricultural sector roleon two indicators in dry land village area. Data from Patanas 2004 included six provinces,these are Lampung, West Java, Central Java, East Java, South Sulawesi and West NusaTenggara is the main source of information in the analysis. The results show thatagricultural sector is dominant source of household income in dry land villages. Highproportion in household labor force who are absorbed in agricultural sector affect to theirworking hours and followed by their income from that sector. Higher in household incomelevel tend to higer in skewness level of their distribution. While, income stability relate toincome source domination. In the area where agricultural sector (especially food crops) isthe main source income, monthly income proportion fluctuate more. Conversly, in the areawhere non agricultural sector is the main source of income, monthly income proportionwill be distribute and fluctuation level is lower. Non agricultural activity, generally can bedone any time a whole the year.