Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS PRODUKTIVITAS TENAGA KERJA TERHADAP PEKERJAAN KERAMIK PADA PANDEMI COVID-19 Safri Safri; Azzahra Nursantyendo Putri; I Ketut Sucita
KERN Vol 8 No 1 (2022): Jurnal KERN: April 2022
Publisher : Program Studi Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (969.834 KB) | DOI: 10.33005/kern.v8i1.63

Abstract

Ceramic work is one of the finishing works in construction projects. During the Covid-19 pandemic, construction projects in Indonesia experienced an impact in the form of a slowdown in work and even a temporary cessation of work , including ceramic work. Although ceramic work is an indoor job, Covid-19 has an effect on labor productivity which is part of the delay in construction projects. In construction projects, labor productivity will have an impact on the compatibility between the planned implementation schedule and the actual work progress in the field. Unsupervised labor productivity can hinder work. The productivity of the workforce can be influenced by several factors, such as human resources, weather, work methods, managerial, and COVID-19 health protocols. There are only a few articles that discuss the influence of Covid-19 on labor productivity work in finishing work, especially ceramic work. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of productivity of ceramic work workers during the Covid-19 pandemic and to find out the comparison of the influence of the factors that influence it. This study uses the Work Sampling method to measure the level of labor productivity because it does not need to be monitored continuously, does not require large costs, and does not give much disturbance to workers. The research was conducted by observing the work directly in the field, distributing questionnaires, and interviewing. The results showed that the productivity of ceramic work workers during the pandemic had an average LUR of 70.65% with the most influential factor being the human resource factor. This is indicated by the average value obtained on the human resources variable, which is 24.85. There is a significant average difference between human resource factors and other factors, indicated by the significance value obtained from hypothesis testing is less than 0.05.
PERBANDINGAN BOQ TULANGAN ANTARA METODE KONVENSIONAL DENGAN BIM APARTEMEN “X” Tasya Putri Artanti; I Ketut Sucita; Erlina Yanuarini
Jurnal Poli-Teknologi Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32722/pt.v21i1.4140

Abstract

When modeling buildings and calculating quantity, changes in the drawings often result in changes to the calculation quantity. Calculations Quantity using conventional methods still uses the area or volume formula to get the volume of work. The volume of work calculated using conventional methods is sometimes inaccurate because it often uses assumptions in its calculations. In this case, it is necessary to develop information technology that integrates modeling and calculations quantity. Building Information Modeling (BIM) is a technology that can model buildings and provide information such as the quantity of the building modeling results. The BIM method is entirely accurate in planning calculations and is expected to solve the problems that exist in conventional methods. This study aims to compare the Bill of Quantity of reinforcement using the conventional method and the BIM method where the author uses an analytical method with the help of Tekla Structures Software. Based on the research conducted, the percentage difference in Bill of Quantity using the BIM method has an average volume of 1.95% greater than the conventional method. This difference is due to an error when inputting data (human error) and is less accurate, such as not calculating the radius or bending of the reinforcement.