Awang Anwaruddin
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 20 Documents
Search

PASANG SURUT PARADIGMA ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK Anwaruddin, Awang
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol 1, No 2 (2004): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi STIA LAN Bandung
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v1i2.192

Abstract

In line with the change of government orientation by the end of twentieth century, from authority to democracy, the manner of public administration development tends to transform from theoretical to empirical. Accordingly, the preceding trademark of public administration as a compile of separate theories has to convert to be such a policy of   problem solving to various public problems. The impact is the development of its dimensions towards the accomplishment of public needs, such as public management implementation, public policy, and public service functions (Nisjar, 1995:43-57).In fact, such consideration corresponds to the fundamental nature of public administration as initially formulated by Woodrow Wilson in 1887 (Frederickson, 1980:2).  Afterward, for more than a hundred years the scholars of public administration have developed various theories and approaches to inductively analyze the thoughts on public administration. The impact is the dynamic development of models and paradigms of public administration varied after their devisers, and the continuous ambiguity of its definition and scopes (Tjokroamidjojo, 1987:16) as Nicholas Henry (1975:27) once said ?... there is a crisis of definition in the field of public administration.? Based on the analysis of various thoughts on public administration, this article aims at revealing  such ambiguity confusing many students of public administration for years.
PENGEMBANGAN MODEL E-GOVERNMENT DALAM PELAYANAN PUBLIK Anwaruddin, Awang
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol 4, No 2 (2007): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v4i2.402

Abstract

The system of public service developed by the Indonesian government is characterized by a centralized top-down monopoly model. The so-called functional, centralized, and integrated model of public service is merely a type of delegation of authority from central government to linked public service institutions without involving the society, especially in terms of interaction and transaction between the government and society in a free way, without delimited by cost, time and space, aswell as the choice of service type and facilities. Thus, it is time for the government to increase the quality of public service through the reformulation of policies that may fulfill the increasing demands of changing era and the development of more strategic infrastructure an facilities, among others, implementing EGovernmentas an effort to facilitate an interaction between the government and society, which we believe as the significant factor of an ideal model of public service.
Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Melalui Reformasi Birokrasi Anwaruddin, Awang
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol 1, No 1 (2004): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi STIA LAN Bandung
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v1i1.186

Abstract

During the last two decades, the issues of public service have been arising all over the world. Triggered by the concept of Reinventing Government (Osborne & Gaebler, 1992), the US Government launched a project with the same term as the concept in 1995. In the beginning of 1990, the UK Government announced the Next Steps as the government effort to fulfil the basic needs of the citizen. Other commonwealth countries, such as Australia, New Zealand and Singapore followed the steps in various terms, all intended to improve the public service (Osborne & Plastrik, 1996).In most cases, the low quality of public institution in facilitating various kinds of   service has generated such spirit of reinventing public service.   People in Indonesia have long suffered from the sluggish and extended bureaucratic chain, which causes high-cost service in the process of attaining the driver license, passport, marital and birth certificates, letters of land belongings, and other formal documents.  The similar phenomena appear in the service of telephone network, electricity, clean water, education, health service, transportation and other public services.The government of Indonesia has actually published various kinds of policy concerning the improvement of public service quality.  Published during the Soeharto era were alternately The Guidance of Simplification and Control of Business Permit (1984), The Guidance of Public Service Management (1993), and The Guidance of Reorganization and Improvement of   Government Apparatus Service to the Society (1995).  After the Reformation era, the government announced The Real Steps to improve Public Service (1998)  and finally the General Guidance of Public Service Implementation(2003). 
PASANG SURUT PARADIGMA ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK Anwaruddin, Awang
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol 1, No 2 (2004): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi STIA LAN Bandung
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v1i2.192

Abstract

In line with the change of government orientation by the end of twentieth century, from authority to democracy, the manner of public administration development tends to transform from theoretical to empirical. Accordingly, the preceding trademark of public administration as a compile of separate theories has to convert to be such a policy of   problem solving to various public problems. The impact is the development of its dimensions towards the accomplishment of public needs, such as public management implementation, public policy, and public service functions (Nisjar, 1995:43-57).In fact, such consideration corresponds to the fundamental nature of public administration as initially formulated by Woodrow Wilson in 1887 (Frederickson, 1980:2).  Afterward, for more than a hundred years the scholars of public administration have developed various theories and approaches to inductively analyze the thoughts on public administration. The impact is the dynamic development of models and paradigms of public administration varied after their devisers, and the continuous ambiguity of its definition and scopes (Tjokroamidjojo, 1987:16) as Nicholas Henry (1975:27) once said “... there is a crisis of definition in the field of public administration.” Based on the analysis of various thoughts on public administration, this article aims at revealing  such ambiguity confusing many students of public administration for years.
TRANSFORMASI KEPEMIMPINAN BIROKRASI Awang Anwaruddin
Jurnal Borneo Administrator Vol 2 No 2 (2006)
Publisher : Puslatbang KDOD Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (158.389 KB) | DOI: 10.24258/jba.v2i2.18

Abstract

Since the last five decades, the behaviourist have scientifically analyzed the implementation of leadership within organizations, and found that leadership is a complicated process that can be described in various theories and models. However, there are a lot of contradictive and over-lapped hypotheses and types of leadership. Hence, it’s difficult to define the ideal leadership. The difficulty is due to the misunderstanding of leadership concept, started from the idea that leadership is something that you own or gain-the same as a certain position in the structure of organization. However, if you have the desire and willpower, no matter who you are and where you work, you can become an effective leader through a never ending process of self-study, education, training, and experience. To inspire your workers into higher levels of teamwork, for example, there are certain things you must learn, understand, and do. These do not come naturally, but are acquired through continual work and study. Good leaders are continually working and studying to improve their leadership skills; they are not resting on their laurels.  Keywords: transformasi kepemimpinan, birokrasi.
e-LEADERSHIP: Faktor Kunci Pengembangan Kapasitas Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi di Daerah Awang Anwaruddin
Jurnal Borneo Administrator Vol 5 No 1 (2009)
Publisher : Puslatbang KDOD Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (83.499 KB) | DOI: 10.24258/jba.v5i1.37

Abstract

Leadership is not limited to a position or job; it is a worldview      and a way of being in the world. It takes vision and imagination as well as knowledge, to be a leader. We define leadership as the ability to bring people, tools and resources together to solve problems and achieve results. In the world today, we need to bring people together across national, geographic, cultural and other boundaries, using communications technologies tools to achieve results. e-Leadership means a balancing many roles and carrying them out via communications technologies.               Thus,  e-Leadership is no different from any other form of effective leadership  except that in e-leadership you have no option but to be very good at it. It  requires a high level of transformational leadership because of the highly  participative nature of the e-world between e-organisations and e-customers and  the interconnectedness between leader and follower with the ever-increasing  reality of the blurred lines between the two (Robert Burke: 2008). Key Word: e-Leadership, e-Government, Kepemimpinan transformasional,  Virtual    tim, Komunikasi multilevel, Profesionalitas
REFORMASI PELAYANAN PUBLIK MELALUI TRANSFORMASI SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP Awang Anwaruddin
Jurnal Borneo Administrator Vol 3 No 2 (2007)
Publisher : Puslatbang KDOD Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24258/jba.v3i2.111

Abstract

The great change in the fields of politics, economy, and technology in the second millenium era has caused ? as indicated by Featherstone (1990), McRae (1996), dan Osborne & Plastrik (1996) ? a long-term economy and governability crisis, especially in developing countries such as Indonesia. Therefore, various strategic efforst should be made by, among others, improving the quality of public service and enhancing the local economy through a model of decentralized government, which last in the recovery of social prosperity in the area. This paper attempts at discussing the concept of social entrepreneurship to the local apparatus as an effort to improve the performance of public service. Twofold objectives could be achieved through the concept: developing the entrepreneurship spirit among the public service apparatus and creating a model of public service oriented to the social needs.  Keywords: public service, social prosperity, social entrepreneurship.
DILEMATIKA PEMEKARAN DAERAH DI INDONESIA Awang Anwaruddin
Jurnal Borneo Administrator Vol 3 No 3 (2007)
Publisher : Puslatbang KDOD Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24258/jba.v3i3.118

Abstract

One the biggest issues recently protruding within the local autonomy framework is the goverment intention to postpone the widespread of regions.
PENGEMBANGAN MODEL E-GOVERNMENT DALAM PELAYANAN PUBLIK Awang Anwaruddin
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol 4, No 2 (2007): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v4i2.402

Abstract

The system of public service developed by the Indonesian government is characterized by a centralized top-down monopoly model. The so-called functional, centralized, and integrated model of public service is merely a type of delegation of authority from central government to linked public service institutions without involving the society, especially in terms of interaction and transaction between the government and society in a free way, without delimited by cost, time and space, aswell as the choice of service type and facilities. Thus, it is time for the government to increase the quality of public service through the reformulation of policies that may fulfill the increasing demands of changing era and the development of more strategic infrastructure an facilities, among others, implementing EGovernmentas an effort to facilitate an interaction between the government and society, which we believe as the significant factor of an ideal model of public service.
Konsistensi Pemberantasan Korupsi Awang Anwaruddin
Jurnal Wacana Kinerja: Kajian Praktis-Akademis Kinerja dan Administrasi Pelayanan Publik Vol 8, No 1 (2005)
Publisher : Center fo State Civil Apparatus Training and Development and Competency Mapping

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1154.872 KB) | DOI: 10.31845/jwk.v8i1.477

Abstract

Dalam salah satu pernyataannya akhir-akhir ini, International Transparency yang bermakas di Berlin mengungkapkan bahwa Indonesia termasuk diantara negara-negara yang paling korup di dunia selama empat tahun terakhir ini. Indonesia menempati posisi keenam terkorup dari 133 negara yang di survei. Bahkan antara negara-negara ASEAN yang di survei (Brunei Darusslama, Cambodja, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philiphines, singapore, Thailand and Vietnam kecuali Myanmar), indonesia menempati posisi teratas. Sementara di Asia hanya Bangladesh and Myanmar yang ‘mampu’mengungguli Indonesia dalam masalah korupsi.