This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL WIDYA MEDIKA
Bernadette Dian Novita
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Eksplorasi faktor yang mempengaruhi penggunaan antibiotik di apotek K24 Wiyung dan Karah Agung Surabaya Bernadette Dian Novita; Wahyu Dewi Tamayanti; Eka Verlina Sugiarto
JURNAL WIDYA MEDIKA Vol 2, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (0.036 KB) | DOI: 10.33508/jwm.v2i2.703

Abstract

Data on Riset Kesehatan Dasar (Riskesdas) 2013, 86,1% antibiotics were used and kept in houses without indication and prescription (Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Rl, 2013). This data supported WHO's study result in 2005 that 50% of the use of drugs in hospitals and health centers was antibiotics. Irrational use of antibiotics were disadvantaged, both, for health, which could induced bacterial resistance, and cost. Unfortunately, people were not yet informed properly. The study, using quantitative methods an interview, assessed the patients' knowledge of antibiotic, described and explored the factors that influence the use of antibiotics and determine the effect of patient education on the use of antibiotics in pharmacies K24Wiyung and Karah Agung Surabaya. The data obtained from the respondents were analyzed with Amos 18. O. From the results, the significant factors that influenced the consumption of antibiotics in pharmacies K24 Wiyung and Karah Agung Surabaya, among others: income (p = 0.031), complaints (p = 0.005), the reason consumption (0.000), resources of information (p = 0001). The factors that were not significant to the use of generic antibiotics include: age (p = 0791), patient knowledge regarding antibiotics (p = 0.404). Thus, information and education about rational use of antibiotics needs to involve these factors in order to be accepted by the patient. To support the rational antibiotic pharmacist should be bold and willing to remind the patient to consult a doctor before taking antibiotics.
EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY OF ENDOMETRIAL LESION CHARACTERISTICS BY AGE IN PATHOLOGY DIAGNOSTIC CENTER IN SURABAYA 2015-2017 Sianty Dewi; Imelda Theodora; Bernadette Dian Novita; Yulia Widyasari; Ricardo Gunadi; Maria Amelia Suhardi; Vincentius Diamantino Supit
JURNAL WIDYA MEDIKA Vol 7, No 1 (2021): April
Publisher : FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33508/jwm.v7i1.3167

Abstract

Background: The etiology of endometrial lesions varies from benign to malignant. Early detection and management of malignancy give the best prognosis for the patient. While studies in America and Europe report a 3-5% risk of malignancy in women below 50 years and a significant increase up to 75-80% in postmenopausal, the availability of national epidemiologic data is limited, therefore the study is held.Method: A descriptive- retrospective study. Total sampling obtained from endometrial specimens in Pathology Diagnostic Center-Prof JH Lunardhi, Sp.PA(K) from 2015 to 2017, while gestation-related, inadequate sample, and incomplete report are excluded. Data analyzed by IBM SPSS 23.0 version. Result: Data of 560 samples, 90% from curettage, 8% hysterectomy, and 2% hysteroscopy. The majority belonged to the 40-49 age group (44.3%). Secretory phase endometrium is the most common finding in the age group of 20-29 years (26.9%). Proliferative phase endometrium is the most common finding. The highest incidence of endometrial hyperplasia occurred in the age group of 40-49 years, for both typical and non-atypical. Endometrial malignancy was found mostly in the 50-59 years (37.03%). Conclusion: The prevalence of endometrial lesions differed according to age groups, with physiological changes, endometritis, polyps, and hyperplasia were most common under 50 years old and the risk of malignancy increased 4.39 times (p.00) beyond 50 years old.