Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Notary Legal Protection Against Crime In The Case That Called As Witnesses Or Suspect Novi Ahmad Arifin; Roswati Dewi; Ngadino Ngadino
Jurnal Akta Vol 6, No 1 (2019): March 2019
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v6i1.4259

Abstract

The purpose of this study were 1) to identify and explain the legal protection of the notaries who was called as a witness or a suspect in the Process of Investigation and Prosecution Pre. 2) To determine the constraints in the implementation of legal protection against notaries who were called as witnesses or suspects.This research using normative juridical approach. Normative approach research problems in terms of its legislation. Methods normative constitute legal research done by examining the data or materials library that is secondary data in the form of legislation, a wide range of literature and Internet sources that are supported by field research is the primary data, which analyzes the rules relating to the Notary Public.Based on data analysis concluded that: 1. Notaries are obliged to keep confidential all matters communicated to him in his capacity as a notary, even though there are some that are not listed in the deed, and has been considered to represent themselves notary in a trial that deed, made by or in the presence of a notary public is an evidence that has the strength of evidence Perfect. 2. Notary criminal cannot be held accountable when there is a loss to either party as a result of the false documents of one of the parties, as Notary simply record what is conveyed by the parties to be poured into the deed. False information submitted by the parties is the responsibility of the parties.Keywords: Notary Act (UUJN); Notarization; Notary Liability.
Law Enforcement Of Giving Restitution For Victims Of Trafficking In The State Court Of Central Jakarta Roswati Dewi; Sri Endah Wahyuningsih; Umar Ma'ruf
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 2, No 4 (2019): December 2019
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v2i4.8363

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze and assess: 1) Law Enforcement of Giving Restitution of Victim of Crime Against Trafficking in West Java Police Jurisdiction; 2) obstacles and barriers in the Restitution Administration of the Victim of Crime Against Trafficking in West Java Police Jurisdiction; and 3) How to overcome the obstacles in Giving Restitution of Victim of Crime Against Trafficking in West Java Police Jurisdiction.This research use sociological juridical approach to the specification of the research is descriptive analysis. Data sources include primary data and secondary data. Methods of data collection using interviews and documentation study. Methods of data analysis in this thesis using qualitative descriptiveThe study concluded that not every Victims of Crime of Trafficking Got Giving Restitution. Obstacles Giving Victims Restitution against Crime of Trafficking affected by the dominant legal factors and the influence of other factors. UUPTPPO an attempt by the State to TPPO, but construction is still weak, law making it difficult for victims obtain restitution, so it needs to be revised. It is recommended that UUPTTPO revised or reconstructed, so UUPTPPO for more providing legal protection for victims of TPPO to establish in the regulations (laws) that the State through the investigating police and / or prosecutor (JPU) who shall seek fulfillment TPPO restitution by offenders to victims TPPO, that is the nation participation for the society.Keywords: Law Enforcement; Restitution; Victims; Crime; Trafficking.