Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bestuur Jurnal Akta
Rudy Iskandar Ichlas
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari, Indonesia
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Analysis on Status as A Co-Defendant Notary in Dispute of Gather Treasure (Case Study in The Court of Ungaran District No: 105 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PN.Unr) Rudy Iskandar Ichlas; Akhmad Khisni
Jurnal Akta Vol 6, No 2 (2019): June 2019
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v6i2.5035

Abstract

Authentic Deed is not solely determined by the law but must also be made before a public official even though the parties have signed. Pernasalahan formulation of this research: 1. How plaintiff legal reasons related to the notary as a co-defendant in the decision number 105 / Rev. G / 2016 / PN. Unr ?, 2. What legal consequences for the Notary as a co-defendant in the decision number 105 / Rev. G / 2016 / PN. Unr. In conclusion: 1). Position Anief Ratnawati, SH, Notary / PPAT in Ungaran as Co-Defendant extremely detrimental due to the lack of legal certainty as Co-Defendant and One goal (error in persona). Hence proved their obscuur libel and Error In Persona judge shall include in its decision to declare the judgment can not receive (NO: Niet ontvankelijk verklaard) lawsuit plaintiffs, 2). Anief Ratnawati, SH. as a Notary Public who is drawn into the dispute be imprecise Co-Defendant not authorized in terms of time (Onbevoegdheid ratione Temporis) and violates the principle of legality and the principles of civil law as private law. On the other hand the plaintiff proved to be an inheritance dispute within the competence of religious courtsKeywords: Legal Analysis; Notary; Co-defendant; Dispute; Gather Treasure.
Questioning the Independence of Media Coverage in the 2019 Elections Rudy Iskandar Ichlas
BESTUUR Vol 8, No 1 (2020): Bestuur
Publisher : Administrative Law Departement Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Mare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (192.45 KB)

Abstract

 This research is motivated by the Television as a news media easily and quickly disseminates information. The formulation of the problem in this study is how to implement the independence of television media coverage of the 2019 Presidential Election? The theory used contains the theory of distributive justice Aristotle (Grand Theory), Election theory (Middle Theory) and Agenda Setting theory Communication (Applied Theory). The research method is empirical normative method with inductive qualitative analysis. The results of this study are the implementation of an independent television media coverage of the 2019 Presidential Election for the 2019 Presidential Election television media proving the existence of a conflicting principle of impartiality. This is not in line with Article 5 letter i of Law Number 32 of 2002 concerning Broadcasting transferred to broadcasting intended to provide balanced information. News which is a product of broadcasting programs in the form of journalistic work becomes a Press dispute is the authority of the Press Council. Juridical coverage of media coverage which is not independent by juridical also opposes because it is not in line with Article 6 letter d of Law Number 40 of 1999 concerning supervising, supervising, correcting, and advising on matters relating to general issues, not the owners of television media the partisan.Keywords: Independence; Television; Elections.
Co-Authors Akhmad Khisni