Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Konstitusi
Winda Wijayanti
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara, Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6 Jakarta
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Eksistensi Undang-Undang Sebagai Produk Hukum dalam Pemenuhan Keadilan Bagi Rakyat (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 50/PUU-X/2012) Winda Wijayanti
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (473.669 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1018

Abstract

Legislation in its formation is influenced by the direction of policy. Prolegnas often defeated by political interests, that determination depends on the political direction of the lawmakers that the legislation referred to as a political product. Prolegnas is part of the political establishment and management of legislation that are instrument-building program planning Act arranged in a planned, integrated, and systematic is needed to organize the national legal system. The Law 12/2011 indicates that the substantive content of the law must satisfy the principle  of  justice and the rule of law.  In addition, the preparation of legislation must meet   the elements of the rule of law, benefits, and equity in equal proportion. Thus, the Law 2/2012 that was in the National Legislation Program is a legal product that can provide justice for the people.
Kedudukan Istri dalam Pembagian Harta Bersama Akibat Putusnya Perkawinan Karena Perceraian Terkait Kerahasiaan Bank Winda Wijayanti
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 4 (2013)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (626.255 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1047

Abstract

Marriage is something sacred, must be respected, the eternality of which must be protected and conducted jointly between a man and a woman as husband and wife so as to achieve a common goal. However, in reality, lots of marriages end   with divorce and is considered as the best way for both partners. When a divorce occurs women is always in a weak position including in the divison of marital property if one party does not have a good faith. Bank as the depository institution maintains the confidentiality of depositors and their deposit which is on the one hand beneficial for depositors since information related to depositors and their deposit can be kept confidential, but on the other hand, it is disadvantageous to interested parties that is a wife who does not know the amount of funds deposited  in her husband’s name in a bank which is a marital property of husband and wife acquired during their marriage. Thus, the wife’s constitutional rights to protection of property under his control and property rights in accordance with Article 28G paragraph (1) and Article 28H Paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution is not protected. The Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution has the authority to examine, try and decide the case of judicial review of Law No. 1 of  1974 on Marriage (Marriage Act) and declare the law conditionally constitutional in the case of bank confidentiality regarding information related to depositors and their deposit to the interests of justice in a civil case concerning the division of maritall property due to  divorce.
Eksistensi Undang-Undang Sebagai Produk Hukum dalam Pemenuhan Keadilan Bagi Rakyat (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 50/PUU-X/2012) Winda Wijayanti
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (473.669 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1018

Abstract

Legislation in its formation is influenced by the direction of policy. Prolegnas often defeated by political interests, that determination depends on the political direction of the lawmakers that the legislation referred to as a political product. Prolegnas is part of the political establishment and management of legislation that are instrument-building program planning Act arranged in a planned, integrated, and systematic is needed to organize the national legal system. The Law 12/2011 indicates that the substantive content of the law must satisfy the principle  of  justice and the rule of law.  In addition, the preparation of legislation must meet   the elements of the rule of law, benefits, and equity in equal proportion. Thus, the Law 2/2012 that was in the National Legislation Program is a legal product that can provide justice for the people.
Pola Penafsiran Konstitusi dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Periode 2003 - 2008 dan 2009 - 2013 Winda Wijayanti
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (382.488 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1421

Abstract

Artikel ini berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang mengangkat permasalahan bagaimana pola penafsiran konstitusi putusan-putusan MK dalam perkara Pengujian Undang- Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar. Sesuai dengan permasalahan yang diangkat, penelitian ini adalah penelitian doktrinal atau juga disebut sebagai penelitian normatif. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah; (1) tidak semua pertimbangan hukum putusan MK dalam perkara pengujian Undang-undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar memberikan penafsiran terhadap ketentuan UUD 1945 yang menjadi batu uji; (2) penafsiran yang digunakan dalam putusan MK pada umumnya adalah penafsiran originalis;(3) Hanya ada tiga putusan yang menggunakan penafsiran non originalis dengan pendekatan doktrin dan hukum alam, serta pendekatan etik; dan (4) tidak terdapat hubungan terpola antara metode penafsiran yang digunakan dengan bidang hukum ketentuan konstitusi maupun periodesasi hakim konstitusi.
Kedudukan Istri dalam Pembagian Harta Bersama Akibat Putusnya Perkawinan Karena Perceraian Terkait Kerahasiaan Bank Winda Wijayanti
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 10, No 4 (2013)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (626.255 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1047

Abstract

Marriage is something sacred, must be respected, the eternality of which must be protected and conducted jointly between a man and a woman as husband and wife so as to achieve a common goal. However, in reality, lots of marriages end   with divorce and is considered as the best way for both partners. When a divorce occurs women is always in a weak position including in the divison of marital property if one party does not have a good faith. Bank as the depository institution maintains the confidentiality of depositors and their deposit which is on the one hand beneficial for depositors since information related to depositors and their deposit can be kept confidential, but on the other hand, it is disadvantageous to interested parties that is a wife who does not know the amount of funds deposited  in her husband’s name in a bank which is a marital property of husband and wife acquired during their marriage. Thus, the wife’s constitutional rights to protection of property under his control and property rights in accordance with Article 28G paragraph (1) and Article 28H Paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution is not protected. The Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution has the authority to examine, try and decide the case of judicial review of Law No. 1 of  1974 on Marriage (Marriage Act) and declare the law conditionally constitutional in the case of bank confidentiality regarding information related to depositors and their deposit to the interests of justice in a civil case concerning the division of maritall property due to  divorce.
Pola Penafsiran Konstitusi dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Periode 2003 - 2008 dan 2009 - 2013 Winda Wijayanti
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (382.488 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1421

Abstract

Artikel ini berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang mengangkat permasalahan bagaimana pola penafsiran konstitusi putusan-putusan MK dalam perkara Pengujian Undang- Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar. Sesuai dengan permasalahan yang diangkat, penelitian ini adalah penelitian doktrinal atau juga disebut sebagai penelitian normatif. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah; (1) tidak semua pertimbangan hukum putusan MK dalam perkara pengujian Undang-undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar memberikan penafsiran terhadap ketentuan UUD 1945 yang menjadi batu uji; (2) penafsiran yang digunakan dalam putusan MK pada umumnya adalah penafsiran originalis;(3) Hanya ada tiga putusan yang menggunakan penafsiran non originalis dengan pendekatan doktrin dan hukum alam, serta pendekatan etik; dan (4) tidak terdapat hubungan terpola antara metode penafsiran yang digunakan dengan bidang hukum ketentuan konstitusi maupun periodesasi hakim konstitusi.
Co-Authors