<![CDATA[Perubahan UUD NRI 1945 mendorong lahirnya Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai pelindung konstitusi dan penjamin hak konstitusional warga negara Indonesia. Putusannya bersifat final dan mengikat, namun terdapat problematika berkaitan dengan kekuatan mengikat, makna filosofis dan akibat hukum implementasi Putusan Nomor 128/PUU-XII/2015 perihal pengujian atas Pasal 33 ayat (1) huruf g. dan Pasal 50 ayat (1) huruf c. UU Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa terkait syarat bagi calon kepala desa atau perangkat desa. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian dan penulisan hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan kasus. Putusan MK No. 128/PUU-XIII/2015 bermakna sebagai pengendalian sosial, merevitalisasi hak pilih warga Negara yang tadinya dianulir sebagai calon kepala desa atau perangkat desa, dan warga Negara yang berpendidikan paling rendah sekolah menengah umum atau sederajat dapat menggunakan hak konstitusionalnya dalam pengisian jabatan kepala desa atau perangkat desa. Putusan MK No. 128/PUU-XIII/2015 termasuk putusan yang membatalkan suatu norma hukum, pelaksanaannya secara langsung sesuai dengan substansi, tanpa memerlukan perubahan terlebih dahulu atas UU No. 6 Tahun 2014. Hasil penelitian itu diharapkan dapat mendukung penguatan implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 128/PUU-XII/2015 dari aspek kekuatan mengikat, makna filosofis, dan akibat hukum implementasinya.Amendments to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia encouraged the birth of the Constitutional Court as a protector of the constitution and a guarantor of the constitutional rights of Indonesian citizens. The decision is final and binding, but there are problems related to binding force, philosophical meaning and the legal consequences of the implementation of Decision Number 128/PUU-XII/2015 regarding the examination of Article 33 paragraph (1) letter g. and Article 50 paragraph (1) letter c. Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages relates to requirements for prospective village heads or village officials. This paper uses research methods and normative law writing with a statute approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Constitutional Court Decision No. 128/PUU-XIII/2015 means as social control, revitalizing the voting rights of citizens who were previously disqualified as candidates for village head or village officers, and citizens with the lowest education of public high school or equivalent can use their constitutional rights in filling the position of village head or village officials. Constitutional Court Decision No. 128/PUU-XIII/2015 including decisions that cancel a legal norm, its implementation is directly in accordance with the substance, without requiring prior changes to Law No. 6 of 2014. The results of the study are expected to support the strength of the implementation of the Constitutional Court Ruling Number 128/PUU-XII/2015 in terms of binding force, philosophical meaning, and the legal consequences of its implementation. ]]>
