Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Konstitusi
Ansori Ansori
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya
Arts Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Legalitas Hukum Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah dalam Menyelenggarakan Pilkada Ansori Ansori
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 3 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (505.514 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1435

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas legalitas hukum Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah (KPUD) dalam menyelenggarakan pemilihan kepala daerah pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan memahami legalisasi pengaturan kedudukan hukum KPUD dalam penyelenggaraan Pilkada pasca putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis-normatif, dengan teori lembaga negara, hierarki, kewenangan, keabsahan hukum, dan tujuan hukum. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh adalah bahwa legalitas kedudukan hukum KPUD dalam penyelenggaraan Pilkada pasca putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013 yaitu bahwa KPUD tidak dapat menyelenggarakan Pilkada karena KPUD bagian dari KPU yang bersifat hierarki, sedangkan KPU berwenang secara konstitusional menyelenggarakan Pemilu, sedangkan Pilkada bukan bagian dari Pemilu pasca putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013 dan KPUD bukan lembaga daerah yang diberikan tugas khusus oleh undang-undang untuk menyelenggarakan pilkada, tugas menyelenggarakan Pilkada tersebut diberikan oleh undang-undang kepada KPU dan dilaksanakan oleh KPUD.The study addressed the legality of Regional Election Commission (KPUD) to hold local elections after the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 97/PUU-XI /2013. It aims to give analysis and to better understand the law that provides legal status of KPUD for organizing the elections after the court decision. The type of research is a juridical-normative research by employing the theory of state organs, hierarchy, powers, legal validity, and legal objectives. The obtained results showed that based on its legal status in organizing regional head elections, after the judgment of the Court decision No. 97/PUU-XI/2013, KPUD cannot hold regional head elections due to its position as subordinate of KPU as a hierarchical organization. KPU has the constitutional power to hold elections while regional head elections are not parts of the Election after the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 97/PUU-XI/2013. KPUD is not a regional organ given a special duty by the law to hold a local election. The task of organizing the local election is given by law to KPU and implemented by KPUD.
PENGHILANGAN HAK POLITIK PERSPEKTIF SISTEM DEMOKRASI Ansori Ansori
Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Juni 2016
Publisher : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (76.266 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/jippk.v1i1.5939

Abstract

Democracy is recognized as the meaning of government is from the people, by the people, for the people and together with the people. This is manifested among others by the existence of general election. How if there are some countries claimed that their countries applied democratic system without having general election. Did this case justified in a democratic system, such as Indonesian where the majority of people state that this country is part of the countries with democratic systems, but on the other hand, Yogyakarta as one of provinces of Indonesia did not organize the democratic election of governor and deputy governor which automatically removes political rights of citizens in Yogyakarta. Whereas in a democratic system, political right is part of the right to think, and it could not be removed from the people in any way and anyhow
PENGHILANGAN HAK POLITIK PERSPEKTIF SISTEM DEMOKRASI Ansori Ansori
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Juni 2016
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (76.266 KB)

Abstract

Democracy is recognized as the meaning of government is from the people, by the people, for the people and together with the people. This is manifested among others by the existence of general election. How if there are some countries claimed that their countries applied democratic system without having general election. Did this case justified in a democratic system, such as Indonesian where the majority of people state that this country is part of the countries with democratic systems, but on the other hand, Yogyakarta as one of provinces of Indonesia did not organize the democratic election of governor and deputy governor which automatically removes political rights of citizens in Yogyakarta. Whereas in a democratic system, political right is part of the right to think, and it could not be removed from the people in any way and anyhow. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v1i12016p007
Legalitas Hukum Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah dalam Menyelenggarakan Pilkada Ansori Ansori
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 14, No 3 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (505.514 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1435

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas legalitas hukum Komisi Pemilihan Umum Daerah (KPUD) dalam menyelenggarakan pemilihan kepala daerah pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan memahami legalisasi pengaturan kedudukan hukum KPUD dalam penyelenggaraan Pilkada pasca putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis-normatif, dengan teori lembaga negara, hierarki, kewenangan, keabsahan hukum, dan tujuan hukum. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh adalah bahwa legalitas kedudukan hukum KPUD dalam penyelenggaraan Pilkada pasca putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013 yaitu bahwa KPUD tidak dapat menyelenggarakan Pilkada karena KPUD bagian dari KPU yang bersifat hierarki, sedangkan KPU berwenang secara konstitusional menyelenggarakan Pemilu, sedangkan Pilkada bukan bagian dari Pemilu pasca putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XI/2013 dan KPUD bukan lembaga daerah yang diberikan tugas khusus oleh undang-undang untuk menyelenggarakan pilkada, tugas menyelenggarakan Pilkada tersebut diberikan oleh undang-undang kepada KPU dan dilaksanakan oleh KPUD.The study addressed the legality of Regional Election Commission (KPUD) to hold local elections after the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 97/PUU-XI /2013. It aims to give analysis and to better understand the law that provides legal status of KPUD for organizing the elections after the court decision. The type of research is a juridical-normative research by employing the theory of state organs, hierarchy, powers, legal validity, and legal objectives. The obtained results showed that based on its legal status in organizing regional head elections, after the judgment of the Court decision No. 97/PUU-XI/2013, KPUD cannot hold regional head elections due to its position as subordinate of KPU as a hierarchical organization. KPU has the constitutional power to hold elections while regional head elections are not parts of the Election after the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 97/PUU-XI/2013. KPUD is not a regional organ given a special duty by the law to hold a local election. The task of organizing the local election is given by law to KPU and implemented by KPUD.
Co-Authors