Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
Nada Ulya Qinvi
Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Studi Perbandingan Kewenangan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Dengan Kejaksaan Malaysia Dalam Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Nada Ulya Qinvi; alfitra alfitra
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 2, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v2i2.13914

Abstract

This study aims to explain the role of the Indonesian Public Prosecutor's Office and the Malaysian Prosecutor's Office in corruption crimes as well as the similarities and differences between the authorities of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutors and the Malaysian Prosecutors in handling corruption cases. This research uses qualitative research research. In this research, the data collection method is carried out by using the library research technique, namely by studying the literature, legislation, books, official documents, and the writings of scholars related to this thesis. and analyzed using descriptive-qualitative methods. The approach used in this research is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that what becomes the similarity between the authority of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Office with the Malaysian Attorney is the role of the permanent prosecutor as public prosecutor, while what distinguishes the authority of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Office with the Malaysian Attorney is the authority in the field of prosecution.Keywords: Comparison, Authority, Attorney, Corruption Crime
Studi Perbandingan Kewenangan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Dengan Kejaksaan Malaysia Dalam Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Nada Ulya Qinvi; Alfitra Alfitra
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 1, No 5 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v1i5.12188

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to explain the role of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia and the Malaysian Attorney in corruption, as well as the similarities and differences between the authority of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia and the Attorney General of Malaysia in handling corruption cases. This research uses qualitative research. In this study the method of data collection is done by the study of literature. Data that has been collected and analyzed using descriptive-qualitative methods. The approach used in this research is the statutory approach and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the similarity between the authority of the Republic of Indonesia Prosecutor's Office with the Malaysian Prosecutor's Office is the role of the Prosecutor as the Public Prosecutor, while the distinguishing authority of the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia and the Prosecutor's Office is Malaysian authority in the field of prosecution.Keywords: Comparison, Authority, Prosecutor, Corruption
Co-Authors Alfitra Alfitra