Andrian Nathaniel
Universitas Pelita Harapan Kampus Surabaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Juridical Analysis About Cyberbullying Cases by Child Perpetrators Against Child Victims Joshua Evandeo Irawan; Andrian Nathaniel; Steven Jonathan
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 22, No 1 (2022): March Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Research and Development Agency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (551.603 KB) | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.17-32

Abstract

This study discusses the legal protection of a child victim of cyberbullying and a child perpetrator. This research raised a case where a child with the initial “Z” who became a victim of cyberbullying from her schoolmate with the initial “S”. The research method used is the normative-juridical method: processing legal materials collected through a literature review.This study aims to determine the applicable law (legal protection) against the child victims of cyberbullying, based on Law No.35 of 2014 in conjunction with Law No.11 of 2008. In terms of the child perpetrator of cyberbullying, the criminal justice system of the children must be based on Law No. 11 of 2012.The result shows that “Z”, the child victim of Cyberbullying, has received positive legal protection in Indonesia based on Article 76C of Law 35/2014, and Article 27 paragraph (4) juncto Article 28 paragraph (2) of Law 11/2012. Child “S” who terrorizes Child “Z” via WhatsApp may be subject to criminal sanctions in accordance to Article 80 paragraph (1) of Law 35/2014 juncto Article 45 paragraph (1) and (2) of Law 11/2008 junctis Article 81 of Law 11/2012. This case criminal sanctions can be imposed on Child “S” with Law 11/2012.
Kekuatan Pencairan Sepihak Terhadap Jaminan Deposito Milik Negara Pada Kredit Perbankan Berupa Cash Collateral Credit Di Bank X Andrian Nathaniel; Tandyo Hasan; Jusup Jacobus Setyabudhi
Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Juli : Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/demokrasi.v1i3.261

Abstract

This research discusses the power of unilateral execution carried out on state-owned collateral objects. There is a lot of gossip or uncertainty related to the status of state assets, in the sense that there are many legal rules that still intersect or overlap in defining state assets themselves. This overlapping of legal regulations has resulted in various interpretations regarding the extent to which the existence and definition of state assets can be applied, one of which is related to BUMN assets, whether they are included in state assets or not state assets. BUMN is a state-owned business entity which of course operates like a business entity in general, so that it carries out various legal and non-legal actions like business entities such as PT, CV, and so on. One of the BUMNs in the form of Persero took legal action by entering into a credit agreement in the form of cash collateral credit at BCA Bank, where it was discovered that the performance of the BUMN was starting to decline and of course this had an impact on the finances of the BUMN Persero itself, so this research will aim to provide a perspective on what the Bank can do if the state-owned company experiences default based on the applicable regulations. This research is using ‘normative-juridical’ as research type where the approach to the processing of legal materials is carried out by means of a literature review. Normative-juridical approach in this research used to analyse the power of unilateral execution of state-owned (BUMN) deposits in credit agreements with a cash collateral credit scheme at Bank X.