Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Theologia Ulumuna: Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Mohammad Subhan Zamzami
STAIN Pamekasan
Religion Arts Humanities Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KONTROVERSI JIDAT HITAM DI MADURA: Studi Penafsiran Komparatif-Sektarian QS. al-Fatḥ [48]: 29 Mohammad Subhan Zamzami
Jurnal Theologia Vol 29, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/teo.2018.29.2.2828

Abstract

This paper reveals athar al-sujūd’s interpretation in QS. al-Fatḥ [48]: 29 behind the controversy of the stigma of black foreheads against certain groups in Islam. This paper is a result of literature and fieldwork research based on comparative interpretation methods (tafsīr muqārin) on five tafsīr books from different schools and interviews with some figures from different religious organizations in Madura. This research has discovered that the controversy from the stigma of a black forehead was not only triggered by different interpretations of athar al-sujūd in QS. al-Fatḥ [48]: 29, but also by several hadiths narrated by Aḥmad, al-Bayhaqī, and al-Bukhārī, which cause controversy among Muslims in Madura. In fact, no group in Islam wants such controversy, either as the subject of the accuser or the accused as a group of black foreheads.
PEMANFAATAN HADĪTH DA’ĪF UNTUK TARGHĪB DAN TARHĪB Mohammad Subhan Zamzami
Ulumuna: Jurnal Studi Keilsman Vol 1 No 1 (2015)
Publisher : LP2M IAI Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (21.475 KB)

Abstract

This article attempts to study some opinions of Muslim scholars and their arguments about applying of weak h{adīths (h{adīth d{a’īf) for stimulus to do any virtues (targhīb) and for prevention to do any evils (tarhīb). It also gives examples of weak h{adīths applied for both cases and explains their weakness according to Muslim scholars’ judgments. Based on their opinions and judgments, it encourages Muslim activists to beware in using any kinds of h{adīths for their religious preaching 
Co-Authors