Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Iffah Muzammil
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Religion Education Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Global Salafisme antara Gerakan dan Kekerasan Iffah Muzammil
Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 3 No. 1 (2013): June
Publisher : Department of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (719.061 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/teosofi.2013.3.1.211-233

Abstract

This article explores Salafism movement between ideology and violence. Categorically, salafi movement can be categorized in two forms. First, salafi. This group berorintasi the purification of faith to make improvements through individual, family, and community structure. Second, salafi jihadi. Although this group also aims to purification, but this group tends to be politically, do not even hesitate to commit violence. However, they both have the desire to realize a people as a form of community of believers. In the end, according to Bernard Haykel, Salafism least understood of the three basic constitution. First, theology embodied in the doctrine of monotheism. In matters of theology, all members of this movement looks unanimously agreed. Second, the law, which pivots on the issue of ijtihad. Although there are differences in attitude, but most of the salafi found ijtihad is a necessity, while taqlîd should be avoided, even by Muslims who are not educated though. Third, the political, which is determined by the methodology of their choice to realize the desire involved in the international arena.
Peta Fiqh Mu'āṣir Muslim Progresif iffah Muzammil
Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 7 No. 1 (2012): September
Publisher : Postgraduate Studies of Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (267.976 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/islamica.2012.7.1.61-84

Abstract

Many contemporary Muslim scholars argue that Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) is not ready to face the demands of the modern era. Modernity is so powerful that it weakens the foundation of fiqh on the one hand, and opens up new opportunities that cannot be reached by fiqh on the other. The method that fiqh has introduced is in itself incapable of adapting to new situation and also incapable of addressing new issues such as the issue of human right, constitusionalism, and the like. It is in this context that contemporary Muslim scholars speak out for reform in the methodology of fiqh as well the application of this methodology in addressing new issues. This paper is concerned with discussing this problem by referring to the thought of some leading authority in this regard such as Abdullahi Ahmed an-Naim, Aboe el-Fadl, and Nasr Hamid Abū Zayd. The paper argues that for these scholars, fiqh has lost its role and power in the modern society because of its discriminative trait. Fiqh must therefore deal with this negative image if it is to restore its influence in the modern civilization.
Co-Authors