Hariyanto Hariyanto
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS KEPAILITAN KOPERASI YANG DIPAILITKAN BERSAMA-SAMA DENGAN PENGURUS DAN PENGAWAS (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 78 K/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2014) Hariyanto Hariyanto
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 5, No 1 (2018): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (316.433 KB)

Abstract

AbstractThis juridical-normative study aims to analyze position and responsibility of cooperative organization in bankruptcy case based on the effective Indonesian laws and regulations. It also covers the application of a simple burden of proof principle to the Verdict of the Supreme Court number 78K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2014. The decision declares bankruptcy of a cooperative together with the boards of management and supervisor. The decision is based on the consideration that cooperative debt is a shared responsibility of management and supervisor.AbstrakPenelitian ini bersifat yuridis-normatif yang bertujuan untuk menganalisa kedudukan dan tanggung jawab perangkat organisasi koperasi dalam perkara kepailitan berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia dan penerapan asas pembuktian sederhana terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 78 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2014 yang mempailitkan koperasi bersama-sama dengan pengurus dan pengawas koperasi dengan dasar utang koperasi merupakan tanggung jawab bersama dari pengurus dan pengawas koperasi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v5n1.a7
The Principle of Justice as a Judges' Considerations in the Concept of Third-Party Responsibility Against Cooperative Legal Action Hariyanto Hariyanto; Herlambang Fadlan Sejati; Puneet Iyer
The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence Vol 4 No 1 (2023): The Digest, June 2023
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/digest.v4i1.75027

Abstract

This research criticizes and analyzes the judges considerations in the Supreme Court Decision Number 250 K / Pdt / 2019 considering third parties’ responsibility related to Audi Et Alteram Partem principle which is part of the principle of justice as fairness. This is normative legal research. Data analysis obtained from library research was carried out in a qualitative way. The data obtained were grouped systematically and then linked to the formulation of the existing problems based on their accuracy value in order to get a clear picture of the discussion. Results showed that the Panel of Judges in Supreme Court Decision Number 250K/Pdt/ 2019 Jo. Decision Number 204/Pdt/2018/PT SMG Jo. Decision Number 20/Pdt.G/2017/ PN Kds has implemented the principle of Audi Et Alteram Partem which is a manifestation of the principle of justice as fairness. The panel of judges has decided fairly by ignoring the concept of cooperatives and the board of directors' responsibilities. Relevant stakeholders must immediately issue the latest law on cooperatives.