Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Indonesian Notary
Eva Achjani Zulfa
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
KEADILAN RESTORATIF DAN REVITALISASI LEMBAGA ADAT DI INDONESIA Eva Achjani Zulfa
Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia Vol 6, No 2 (2010): Agustus
Publisher : Universitas Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper is intended to explored the revitalization of local custom or traditional institutions due to restorative justice concept and its implementation. Depicting several examples from other nations, the writer then describes potential problems within local custom or tradition in Indonesia whilst implementing restorative justice.
Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) Terhadap Penggelapan Pajak Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah Dan Bangunan (BPHTB) Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 738/Pid.B/2018/PN Smg Viny Dwivi; Eva Achjani Zulfa
Indonesian Notary Vol 3, No 3 (2021): Indonesian Notary
Publisher : Universitas Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (318.683 KB)

Abstract

738/Pid.B/2018/PN Smg pada perbuatan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) yang tidak menuntaskan pengurusan pembayaran pajak Bea Perolehan Hak atas Tanah dan Bangunan (BPHTB) yang telah dititipkan oleh klien. Hal ini berujung kepada tindak pidana penggelapan uang pajak yang dilakukan oleh PPAT sehingga klien mengalami kerugian. Adapun Permasalahan yang diangkat adalah mengenai kewenangan PPAT dalam penerimaan penitipan pembayaran pajak BPHTB dan tanggung jawab PPAT dalam penggelapan pajak BPHTB pada transaksi jual beli hak atas tanah dan bangunan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yuridis normatif, dengan tipologi penelitian preskriptif. Hasil analisa adalah bahwa titipan pembayaran BPHTB bukan merupakan kewenangan PPAT melainkan kewajiban dari wajib pajak. Adanya titipan pembayaran BPHTB yang diterima oleh PPAT, melahirkan tanggung jawab bagi PPAT baik secara pidana, perdata, administrasi maupun kode etik. Perbuatan penggelapan pajak BPHTB yang dilakukan PPAT melanggar hukum sehingga PPAT harus mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya secara pidana karena melanggar Pasal 374 KUHP dan Pasal 2 Ayat (1) UU PTPK, dapat digugat untuk mengganti kerugian secara perdata karena memenuhi unsur perbuatan melawan hukum dalam Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata, sanksi administrasi berupa denda dalam Pasal 26 ayat (1) UU BPHTB, dan pelanggaran kode etik PPAT dengan sanksi pemberhentian pemberhentian dengan tidak hormat dari keanggotaan perkumpulan IPPAT sebagaimana dalam Pasal 6 Kode Etik PPAT.                        Kata Kunci: PPAT, Tindak Pidana Penggelapan, Pajak BPHTB
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Sebagai Korban Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Akta Otentik Studi Putusan No.249/Pid.B/2020/PN PTK Andhita Indirayanti; Eva Achjani Zulfa
Indonesian Notary Vol 4, No 2 (2022): Indonesian Notary
Publisher : Universitas Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (396.409 KB)

Abstract

Akta Otentik merupakan akta yang diterbitkan yang bentuknya telah diatur dalam undang-undang,memuat peristiwa-peristiwa atau perbuatan hukum dan digunakan sebagai pembuktian.Berdasarkan latar belakang masalah tersebut diatas penulis mengutamakan sebuah permasalahan yaitu bagaimana pembuktian akta otentik, apa akibat hukum dari suatu Akta yang sengaja di palsukan, dan bagaimana perlindungan yang diberikan kepada notaris yang menjadi korban pemalsuan akta. Metode penelitian yang digunakan tipe penelitian hukum normatif, tipologi penelitian yang digunakan sifat nya penelitian preskriptif yang bertujuan untuk memberikan solusi atau saran dalam mengatasi masalah pembuktian akta, akibat hukum Akta Notaris, serta  perlindungan hukum bagi Notaris yang menjadi korban tindak pidana pemalsuan akta otentik serta untuk kemudian dikaitkan dengan teori dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait, jenis data yang digunakan ialah data primer dan sekunder,  metode analisis data yang digunakan yaitu metode kualitatif, menggunakan prosedur pengumpul data studi dokumen atau bahan pustaka dan wawancara serta analisa bahan hukum penulis menganalisis secara deskriptif analitis. Berdasarkan uraian dalam pembahasan dari bab ke bab maka dapat ditarik kesimpulan bahwa akta yang tidak memenuhi syarat pembuatan akta yang tercantum dalam peraturan perundang-undangan tidak mempunyai nilai pembuktian yang sempurna dan akibat nya akta tersebut tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum yang mengikat. Serta pemgaturan mengenai perlindungan untuk notaris yang menjadi korban pemalsuan akta belum diatur didalam undang-undang sehingga satu-satu nya cara perlindungan hukum untuk notaris yaitu notaris dalam membuat akta harus sesuai dengan yang ditaur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Selain itu notaris juga harus menerapkan suatu prinsip kehati-hatian dengan tidak percaya begitu saja terhadap pihak-pihak yang ingin membuat akta otentik. Kata kunci : Akta, pembuktian akta otentik, akibat hukum akta otentik, perlindungan notaris. 
Diversion as an Instrument to Terminate Criminal Investigations Conducted by Children Through the Issuance of SP3 by Investigators Benito Harleandra; Eva Achjani Zulfa; Iza Fadri
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 6, No 1 (2023): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute February
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v6i1.7404

Abstract

This research is the result of research on diversion as an instrument for stopping criminal investigations through the issuance of SP3 by investigators against Children in Conflict with the Law (AKH) at the investigation stage. This research was conducted using qualitative descriptive research methods and analytical descriptive methods, namely research methods by describing data collected through library research, where researchers studied and took data from various literatures in the form of books, official reports, scientific journals, articles, and news. The results of the study show, firstly, if the diversification is successful and the results of the diversion agreement are stated, based on the decision of the District Court, the Investigator in this case the South Jakarta Metro Police issues an Investigation Termination Order (SP3) after the diversion agreement is fully implemented. Second, Article 109 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code has limitedly stated the reasons that can be used by investigators as the basis for stopping an investigation, namely: (i) there is not enough evidence; (ii) the incident turned out to be not a criminal act; or (iii) the investigation is terminated by law. As such, diversion has no relevance to the termination of the investigation or diversion cannot be used as a reason to stop the investigation. Because diversion with the termination of the investigation is a different matter, both in terms of the reasons that form the basis for its implementation and the process.
Bjorka: A Cyber Crime Phenomenon Which Gets Support from the Community Using Analysis of Criminological Perspective Hegar Gagah Anantaka; Eva Achjani Zulfa; Surya Nita
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute May
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v6i2.7600

Abstract

Indonesia is experiencing several cybercrimes mostly in the form of online fraud and extortion, phishing and hacking. Since the Covid-19 pandemic hit, Indonesia has been faced with several hacking cases containing Indonesian people's personal data where this data was traded illegally on internet sites. One case that has received a lot of attention from the public in a longer period of time than usual is the hacking case by a hacker named Bjorka. However, the cyber crime case in the form of hacking and doxing that was carried out by Bjorka actually received support from the majority of Indonesian people rather than criticism. The criticism of the Indonesian people was actually directed at the government and this criticism was getting stronger driven by the hacktivism carried out by Bjorka. The research was compiled with the aim of knowing the background and factors that made the Bjorka cybercrime case different and popular among the public and thus gained support through a criminological perspective. The method used to compile this research is a qualitative method with literature study. This paper concludes that according to the RAT (Routine Activity Theory) Bjorka's cybercrime has succeeded in attracting the attention of the Indonesian people because Bjorka has the right motivation as an actor and target of victims, besides that government agencies are unable to maintain national cyber security with solidity. This study also has the conclusion that Bjorka received public support through his hacktivism on social media.
Asset Repairon the Corruption Eradication Commission: Strategies in the Fight against Corruption in Indonesia RA Gismadiningrat; Eva Achjani Zulfa; Surya Nita
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 6, No 3 (2023): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute August
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v6i3.7663

Abstract

The phenomenon of corruption as an extraordinary crime in Indonesia shows the existence of endemic corruption, which is accompanied by the emergence of significant losses to the state's finances. Efforts to enforce the law through the application of corporal punishment (prison) fines or additional punishment in the form of replacement money have not turned out to be maximal in rescuing stolen assets so that the state remains the victim. Asset recovery is one of the goals of new punishment and is one of the strategies of the Corruption Eradication Commission in dealing with criminal acts of corruption, but the implementation of asset recovery is not easy, the perpetrators always have various new and sophisticated modus operandi to hide/obscurate assets resulting from corruption, so that they are not traced. . This article aims to answer research: The research method uses empirical normative juridical research, with a statute approach and a case approach.. Through the application of the Balanced Probability Principle Theory and Non Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture, the mechanism for tracking money and following assets using money laundering and civil lawsuits articles needs to be placed as the main legal remedy besides criminal law enforcement, so that the implementation of asset recovery at the Corruption Eradication Commission can be carried out maximally.
Co-Authors Andhita Indirayanti Benito Harleandra Hegar Gagah Anantaka Iza Fadri RA Gismadiningrat Surya Nita Viny Dwivi