Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DEDIKASI JURNAL MAHASISWA Indonesian Perspective Indonesian Perspective
Muhammad Fadhilah
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
TINJAUAN HUKUM PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI RIIL DALAM PUTUSAN PERADILAN PERDATA Muhammad Fadhilah
Journal of Law ( Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ) Vol 7, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract Execution is an obligation that must be carried out by the court based on a legal basis in accordance with Article 54 paragraph (2) of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power which expressly stipulates that the implementation of court decisions in civil cases is carried out by the Registrar and the bailiff led by the Chairman. Court.It is necessary to increase socialization regarding the rules and or procedures for execution to the public so that the public can better understand that the theory of legal certainty is able to protect the interests and rights of the community, as well as increase compliance with the rule of law and respect for the rights of fellow citizens.For officials in the judiciary, it is necessary to increase understanding that the law must be enforced as well as possible in a balanced manner in protecting the interests of the parties so that the implementation of court decisions or executions must be maximized so that all justice-seeking efforts do not only win on paper but can be realized. in fact. Keywords: Execution. Court Decision
Inkonsistensi Kebijakan Luar Negeri Melanesia Spearhead Group (MSG) dalam Isu Papua Barat: Studi Kasus Fiji dan Papua Nugini Muhammad Fadhilah
Indonesian Perspective Vol 4, No 1: (Januari-Juni 2019), hlm. 1-99
Publisher : Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (853.058 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/ip.v4i1.24480

Abstract

West Papua issue is one of the most dynamic issue, especially in South Pacific region. Melanesian Spearhead Group is one of the organization from Melanesia sub-region which very actively engaging in decolonization and human rights issue in West Papua. Since the establishment in 1988, the organization which consist of four Melanesian states plus one independence movement party have been supporting the decolonization issue in the region. However, MSG foreign policy in West Papua issue is characterized by inconsistency when dealing with the struggle to support the decolonization. Instead of expressing strong opposition toward Indonesia’s human rights abuses in West Papua, MSG tends to engage Indonesia. This paper aims to explain this puzzle using the case study of Fiji and Papua New Guinea. This paper emphasizes on domestic factors which affect two countries foreign policy in West Papua issue. Using the concept of national interest combined with domestic constraint on foreign policy as a tool of analysis, this paper argues that the inconsistency of two MSG member countries foreign policy is caused by domestic factors
Inkonsistensi Kebijakan Luar Negeri Melanesia Spearhead Group (MSG) dalam Isu Papua Barat: Studi Kasus Fiji dan Papua Nugini Muhammad Fadhilah
Indonesian Perspective Vol 4, No 1: (Januari-Juni 2019), hlm. 1-99
Publisher : Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (853.058 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/ip.v4i1.24480

Abstract

West Papua issue is one of the most dynamic issue, especially in South Pacific region. Melanesian Spearhead Group is one of the organization from Melanesia sub-region which very actively engaging in decolonization and human rights issue in West Papua. Since the establishment in 1988, the organization which consist of four Melanesian states plus one independence movement party have been supporting the decolonization issue in the region. However, MSG foreign policy in West Papua issue is characterized by inconsistency when dealing with the struggle to support the decolonization. Instead of expressing strong opposition toward Indonesia’s human rights abuses in West Papua, MSG tends to engage Indonesia. This paper aims to explain this puzzle using the case study of Fiji and Papua New Guinea. This paper emphasizes on domestic factors which affect two countries foreign policy in West Papua issue. Using the concept of national interest combined with domestic constraint on foreign policy as a tool of analysis, this paper argues that the inconsistency of two MSG member countries foreign policy is caused by domestic factors
Co-Authors