Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi
Theo Negoro
Parahyangan Catholic University
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Penerapan Metode Omnibus Law Dikaitkan Teori Kemanfaatan Hukum Dalam Permasalahan Legislasi Lingkungan Hidup Hassanain Haykal; Demson Tiopan; Theo Negoro
Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Serang Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30656/ajudikasi.v5i1.3224

Abstract

Environmental problems are very complex, one of which is related to the formation of laws and regulations in the environmental sector. The interrelated effect of the many regulations governing environmental problems raises not only legal problems, but also moral problems such as corruption and bribery. One of the efforts to solve environmental legislation problems is The Omnibus Law. The Omnibus Law itself often used by other countries to overcome chaos of the prevailing laws which are considered as too many and thus efficiency is in need to create legal certainty and to avoid overlapping between state institutions authority. This article is an analytical-juridical study regarding the application of the Omnibus Law metdhod to address legislative problems regarding the environment in Indonesia. This study uses a normative juridical approach with the data obtained from library research and literature related to the object being studied. The result of the study found that the Omnibus Law method can be used as a way to harmonize the laws and regulations regarding the environment in Indonesia with a note that it fosters a sense of awarnezss and a sense of belonging to the community towards legal product that use the Omnibus Law method as a means of ordering legislation.
Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum Atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum? Endang Pratiwi; Theo Negoro; Hassanain Haykal
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 19, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (341.267 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1922

Abstract

Utility as a legal purpose has become a belief in Indonesia. In his literature, Bentham implies that utility are the dimension of the calculation of pleasure and pain, which is more appropriate to be used as a method of evaluating laws and regulations, rather than for legal purposes. This study tries to dissect the concept of Bentham's utilitarianism theory, and to find its position in the facet of legal thought. The conclusion of this study explains why utility is not a legal purpose. Utility is part of the calculation variables for evaluating legal product evaluation methods, so as to determine whether legal certainty in a legal product is sustainable or not. Furthermore, Bentham's theory of utilitarianism takes the separability thesis and the reductive thesis, as its standpoint of legal positivism, therefore Bentham's utilitarianism theory is not an independent school of thought, but a facet of legal positivism
Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum Atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum? Endang Pratiwi; Theo Negoro; Hassanain Haykal
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk1922

Abstract

Utility as a legal purpose has become a belief in Indonesia. In his literature, Bentham implies that utility are the dimension of the calculation of pleasure and pain, which is more appropriate to be used as a method of evaluating laws and regulations, rather than for legal purposes. This study tries to dissect the concept of Bentham's utilitarianism theory, and to find its position in the facet of legal thought. The conclusion of this study explains why utility is not a legal purpose. Utility is part of the calculation variables for evaluating legal product evaluation methods, so as to determine whether legal certainty in a legal product is sustainable or not. Furthermore, Bentham's theory of utilitarianism takes the separability thesis and the reductive thesis, as its standpoint of legal positivism, therefore Bentham's utilitarianism theory is not an independent school of thought, but a facet of legal positivism
Co-Authors Demson Tiopan Endang Pratiwi Hassanain Haykal