Muwahid Muwahid
UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

Penerapan Hukuman Mati Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Muwahid Muwahid
Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Vol 18 No 2 (2015): Al-Qanun Vol. 18, No. 2, Desember 2015
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (382.494 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/alqanun.2015.18.2.248-274

Abstract

Research on the application of the death penalty for perpetrators of corruption is a research library , with the purpose to find out: first, setting the death penalty in law of corruption; secondly, the application of the death penalty for perpetrators of corruption in a human rights perspective. Primary data were obtained from the legislation, secondary data obtained from the criminal law books, law journals, and legal dictionaries. Data was collected to study the document. While the use of data analysis techniques "content analysis". The results showed; first, setting the death penalty in the Act eradication of corruption, there is only one article setting that article 2, paragraph (2) In the article explained that the death penalty can be applied to the perpetrators of corruption in " certain circumstances"; secondly, the application of the death penalty for corruptors if only textually examined, then the application of the death penalty is contrary to human rights as dicantukan in Article 28A paragraph (1), 28I (1), in conjunction with Article 4 of Law No. 39 of 1999, in conjunction with Article 3 of the Universal Declaration . However, if examined contextually by using extentif and teleological interpretation, the actual application of the death penalty does not conflict with Human Rights.
Optimalisasi Peran Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) dalam Mewujudkan Pemilu yang Demokratis di Indonesia Ta’mirotul Biroroh; muwahid muwahid
Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Vol 24 No 2 (2021): Al-Qanun, Vol. 24, No. 2, Desember 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/alqanun.2021.24.2.365-384

Abstract

The General Election Commission (KPU) is an institution that carries out the function of organizing elections in Indonesia. In addition to the KPU, there are institutions that also play an important role in the implementation of elections and are closely related to the existence of the KPU, namely survey institutions that carry out quick count processes. The survey institutions in a number of developing countries, especially those that are actively building democracy, are also not a little doubted by their moral honesty, at least being sued with a critical attitude such as the existence of a poll on the existence of a political survey institution, which has resulted in an attitude of uncertainty about the performance survey agency. This condition makes people less confident in the survey results which are considered no longer independent. It is proven that every time an election is held, a number of survey institutions seem to want to lead public opinion towards certain contestants. This is certainly very unfortunate considering that the survey results are one of the important instruments in democracy. Abstrak: Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) merupakan lembaga yang menjalankan fungsi sebagai penyelenggara pemilu di Indonesia. Selain KPU, terdapat lembaga yang juga berperan penting dalam pelaksanaan pemilu dan terkait erat dengan eksistensi KPU, yakni lembaga survei yang melakukan proses hitung cepat (quick count). Berbagai lembaga survei yang ada di beberapa negara berkembang yang sedang giat melakukan proses demokratisasi, tidak sedikit yang diragukan kejujuran moralnya di kalangan masyarakat dengan berbagai pandangan dan sikap kritis yang tidak sedikit menghasilkan sikap kegamangan atas kinerja dari lembaga survei tersebut. Kondisi yang ada ini membuat masyarakat kurang memberikan kepercayaan kepada hasil yang diberkan oleh lembaga survei yang dinilai tidak lagi independen. Hal tersebut terbukti dalam berbagai kesempatan dalam penyelenggaraan pemilu, sejumlah lembaga survei yang ada memberikan kesan ingin menggiring opini publik kepada kontestan tertentu. Hal tersebut tentu sangat disayangkan mengingat bahwa hasil survei merupakan salah satu instrumen penting dalam demokrasi.
Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Yang Melibatkan Pihak Swasta Perspektif Hukum Islam Muwahid Muwahid
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2017): April 2017
Publisher : Prodi Siyasah (Hukum Tata Negara) Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (546.512 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2017.7.1.128-162

Abstract

Abstract: There has been changes in the issue of land procurement for national development and public use in Indonesia. The article highlights the role of private sector in the process. While in some previous regulation private are not involved in the process, the Law No. 11/2012 states that private sectors can involve in innfrastructure construction for public facilities, whereas the procurement of land for the purpose is conducted by the govenrment. This has been in line with islamic law of property in which revocation of individual’s propety, including land propert, by the state and its use for public goods is allowed. In so doing, the government should do the procurement, not private sectors. Abstrak: Dinamika pengaturan pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum yang melibatkan swasta adalah bahwa dalam Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 15 Tahun 1975, swasta terlibat penuh dalam pengadaan tanah, sementara dalam Keputusan Presiden Nomor 55 Tahun 1993, Peraturan Presiden Nomor 36 Tahun 2005, dan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 65 Tahun 2006, swasta tidak dapat terlibat dalam pengadaan tanah, sementara dalam UU. Nomor 2 Tahun 2012, swasta dapat terlibat dalam pelaksanaan pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum, sementara pengadaan tanahnya domain pemerintah. Formulasi pengaturan keterlibatan pihak swasta dalam pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum, yaitu melalui model kerjasama pemerintah swasta (Public Privat Partnership), di mana pemerintah melakukan pengadaan tanah sedangkan swasta melaksanakan pembangunan infrastrukturnya. Dalam perspektif hukum Islam, pembebasan dan pencabutan hak atas tanah diperbolehkan apabila peruntukannya untuk kepentingan umum, bukan untuk kepentingan komersil, dan yang harus melakukan pembebasan atau pencabutan adalah pemerintah, bukan pihak swasta.
Kewenangan Pemerintah Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Muwahid Muwahid
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 8 No. 2 (2018): Oktober
Publisher : Prodi Siyasah (Hukum Tata Negara) Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (447.843 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2018.8.2.318-345

Abstract

The government, in carrying out land acquisition for the public interest, gets the authority of attribution in Law No. 5 of 1960 about the Basic Agrarian Principles (UUPA) as contained in article 2, article 6, and article 18. On the oher hands, the government also gets the attributional authority of Law No. 20 of 1961 about revocation of land rights, and Law No. 2 of 2012 about land acquisition for development of the public interest. However, in the laws and regulations governing land acquisition in the public interest, there is an inconsistency in regulation between Law No. 2 of 2012 and Law No. 20 of 1961. Several articles in Law No. 2 of 2012 deny the provisions regulated in Law No. 20 of 1961. Even though Law No. 20 of 1961 is still valid because it has never been revoked or replaced with other laws and regulations. Beside that, there is an overlapping arrangement between Law No. 2 of 2012 and Law No. 20 of 1961. Keywords: Authority, Government, Land Procur
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tenaga Kerja Wanita Ilegal di Malaysia Muwahid Muwahid; Abdul Kholiq Syafa'at
Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): Desember 2018
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Pidana Islam Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (367.406 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/aj.2018.4.2.339-359

Abstract

The research on legal protection of illegal female labors in Malaysia aims; knowing the implementation of legal protection against illegal female labors in Malaysia; knowing the factors that influence the implementation of legal protection against illegal female labors; and looking for solutions to optimize the implementation of legal protection against illegal female labors in Malaysia. The results of this study indicate that legal protection for illegal female labors in Malaysia is not optimally, because they lose their rights before the law, and are exacerbated by the majority working in the informal sector so that they are not reached by labor law. Of course this is not in accordance with the principle of the rule of law adopted by Indonesia, as contained in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The absence of a mechanism to protect illegal female workers is a state's neglect of the protection of human rights for all citizens, which is one of the main elements of the rule of law.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak Korban Kekerasan Seksual di Kota Surabaya Muwahid Muwahid
Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): Desember 2019
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Pidana Islam Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4069.442 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/aj.2019.5.2.338-360

Abstract

Children are the future generation who require protection from violence, whether physical, psychological and sexual violence. This study seeks to uncover such problems; (1) the form of legal protection of children against sexual violence victims in Surabaya; (2) the constraints in the implementation of legal protection of children against sexual violence victims in Surabaya; (3) attempts to maximize the implementation of the legal protection of children against sexual violence victims in Surabaya. The present study is a field research. The primary data obtained through interviews while secondary data obtained from documents, law books and law journals. Data analysis technique using content analysis that is the analysis technique by describing the substance of the existing problems. The results of the research revealed that; Firstly, the form of legal protection of children against sexual violence victims in Surabaya can be seen from the two forms, they are preventive protection and repressive legal protection. Preventive legal protection is done before the sexual crimes, while the protection of repressive laws is done after the acts of sexual violence; secondly, constraints faced in the implementation of legal protection, they are; the victim is introvert, the act of hoodlum, the societies’ individual attitude that is really powerful and a lack of public understanding about children’s rights; Third, ways and means need to be done to maximize the implementation of legal protection is a way to provide understanding to parents and children about the dangers of sexual violence, and the need for strengthening the commitment and systematic and massive cooperation of law enforcement officials. Abstrak: Anak merupakan generasi penerus bangsa yang memerlukan perlindungan dari tindak kekerasan, baik fisik, psikis, dan kekerasan seksual. Dalam konteks inilah tulisan ini hadir, yaitu untuk mengetahui: (1) bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap anak korban kekerasan seksual di Surabaya; (2) kendala-kendala dalam pelaksanaannya serta upaya untuk memaksimalkan pelaksanaan tersebut. Tulisan ini merupakan hasil penelitian lapangan, di mana data diperoleh melalui dan studi dokumen, yang selanjutnya dianalisa dengan menggunakan content analysis. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan; pertama, bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap anak korban kekerasan seksual di Surabaya bisa dilihat dari dua bentuk, yakni perlindungan preventif yang dilakukan sebelum terjadi kejahatan seksual, dan perlindungan hukum represif yang dilakukan setelah terjadi tindak kekerasan seksual. Kedua, kendala-kendala yang dihadapi antara lain; tertutupnya korban, adanya aksi premanisme, sikap individualitas masyarakat yang cukup kuat dan kurangnya pemahaman masyarakat tentang hak-hak anak; ketiga, upaya yang perlu dilakukan guna memaksimalkan pelaksanaannya adalah cara memberikan pemahaman kepada orang tua dan anak mengenai bahaya kekerasan seksual, dan perlunya penguatan komitmen dan kerjasama yang sistematis dan masif dari aparat penegak hukum.
Analisis Perkara Wanprestasi terhadap Akad Murabahah Bil Wakalah: Studi Putusan No. 2/Pdt.G.S/2020/PA. Bjn Khalwah Faridah; Alifiansyah Mukti Wibowo; Rizky Febrianti Amir; Salsabila Anindya Putri; Syafira Fuaidah; Muwahid Muwahid
Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Februari
Publisher : Laboratorium Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4936.806 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/mal.v2i1.51

Abstract

Abstract: This article discusses the analysis of simple civil lawsuit verdict No. 2 / Pdt.G.S / 2020 / PA Bjn. related to the existence of default (broken promise) in the implementation of the murabahah bil wakalah contract. This research is the result of a literature review by deciding PA Bojonegoro as the main source. The collected data were analyzed deductively. The filing of the lawsuit began when the defendant bought from the plaintiff a house with a selling price of Rp. 781,979,940, - where the purchase price of the bank/cost of goods is Rp. 500,000,000, - and the bank's profit/margin amounting to Rp. 281,979,940. The agreed installment payment agreement is carried out for 60 months in which each month the installment must be paid in the amount of Rp. 13,032,999, -. The breach of promise began to appear when the defendant had only paid 41 installments of the 49 installments that should have been paid up to March 2020, which means that Defendant was in arrears since August 2019 and there were still 11 more installments that had not yet been due, so the total was 60 installments. The losses suffered by Plaintiff amounted to Rp. 104,263,992, -. After the mediation, the plaintiff and defendant agreed to settle the matter out of court, and the defendant had paid off the debt (dependence) to the plaintiff. The plaintiff stated that he withdrew the plaintiff's claim in writing as referred to in the plaintiff's application letter regarding the plaintiff's claim withdrawal No. B.160 / KCP / Bojonegoro / 06/2020, dated 29 June 2020, in the case of sharia economy simple lawsuit No. 2 / Pdt.G.S / 2020 / PA. Bjn, dated June 10, 2020. The decision was considered to be the best decision because before passing the verdict, of course, the Panel of Judges considered various considerations and existing evidence.Keywords: decision No. 2 / Pdt.G.S / 2020 / PA Bjn, murabahah bil wakalah contract, default. Abstrak: Artikel ini membahas tentang analisis putusan perdata gugatan sederhana No. 2/Pdt.G.S/2020/PA Bjn. terkait adanya wanprestasi (ingkar janji) dalam pelaksanaan akad murabahah bil wakalah. Penelitian ini merupakan hasil kajian pustaka dengan menjadikan putusan PA Bojonegoro sebagai sumber utama. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis secara deduktif. Pengajuan gugatan tersebut bermula ketika tergugat membeli dari penggugat sebuah rumah dengan harga jual barang Rp. 781.979.940,- dimana harga beli bank/harga pokok sejumlah Rp. 500.000.000,- dan keuntungan/margin bank yang diperoleh sejumlah Rp. 281.979.940. Perjanjian pembayaran angsuran yang disepakati dilakukan selama 60 bulan dimana setiap bulannya angsuran yang harus dibayarkan sejumlah Rp. 13.032.999,-. Perbuatan ingkar janji tersebut mulai terlihat ketika tergugat baru membayar 41 kali angsuran dari 49 bulan angsuran yang seharusnya dibayar sampai dengan bulan Maret 2020, yang artinya Tergugat menunggak sejak Agustus 2019 dan masih terdapat 11 angsuran lagi yang belum jatuh tempo sehingga total keseluruhan adalah 60 angsuran. Adapun kerugian yang diderita Penggugat sejumlah Rp. 104.263.992,-. Setelah dilakukan mediasi, penggugat dan tergugat sepakat menyelesaikan permasalahan tersebut di luar pengadilan, dan tergugat telah melunasi hutang (tanggungan) kepada penggugat. Penggugat menyatakan mencabut gugatan penggugat secara tertulis sebagaimana surat permohonan penggugat tentang pencabutan gugatan penggugat No. B.160/KCP/Bojonegoro/06/2020, tanggal 29 Juni 2020, dalam perkara gugatan sederhana ekonomi syariah No. 2/Pdt.G.S/2020/PA. Bjn, tanggal 10 Juni 2020. Putusan tersebut dinilai merupakan putusan terbaik karena sebelum menjatuhkan putusan tersebut, tentunya Majelis Hakim mempertimbangkan berbagai pertimbangan dan bukti-bukti yang ada. Kata kunci: putusan No. 2/Pdt.G.S/2020/PA Bjn, akad murabahah bil wakalah, wanprestasi.
Peran Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dan Kepolisian dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Sistem Hukum Muwahid Muwahid; Akiya Qidam Hayya; Tiara Intan Putri
Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): Desember 2021
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Pidana Islam Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/aj.2021.7.2.409-435

Abstract

This article discusses the role of the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Police in eradicating corruption in Indonesia from the perspective of legal system theory. This research is normative legal research, using legislation, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials are obtained from laws and regulations, law books, legal journals, and related articles, then analyzed using deductive thinking patterns, namely drawing general things to draw a specific conclusion. The study results indicate that the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Police are included in sub-systems of criminal justice, both of which have the authority to enforce the law in the field of corruption per the authorities stipulated in the legislation. From the legal system theory perspective, the enforcement of criminal acts of corruption must be seen from three aspects, namely the laws and regulations, law enforcement officers, and the legal culture of the community. From these three aspects, the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Police have a very decisive role in law enforcement for corruption under their respective authorities.