Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Ridwan Ridwan
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Penista Agama Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pandeglang Nomor : 28/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Pdl Amirulloh Ahdad; Ridwan Ridwan; Reine Rofiana
Yustisia Tirtayasa : Jurnal Tugas Akhir Vol. 3 No. 2 May-August 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/yta.v3i2.19585

Abstract

The polemic on the issue of blasphemy or better known as blasphemy has again become a discussion on the topic of this problem, especially in Indonesia because of the massive flow of information and freedom of opinion. Like a Pandeglang resident, especially a resident of Gadog Village who was entangled in a blasphemy case. Based on his actions, the articles charged against Arnold are: Article 45A paragraph (2) of ITE Law No. 19/2016. This research is normative juridical research, which is research conducted or aimed only at written regulations or legal materials consisting of secondary materials including Judges' Decisions, laws and regulations, books, journals, and other literature and supported by data obtained through interviews. This research resulted in the conclusion that the judge's legal considerations in this decision lacked a sense of justice, especially for the defendant. The panel of judges only considers witnesses and experts who incriminate the defendant and does not consider the defendant's testimony. The decision of the Pandeglang District Court Judge was corrected by the Banten High Court Judges on one of the grounds that the length of the sentence (strafmaat) imposed on the defendant did not pay attention to the purpose of punishment and the rules of justice for all parties, not just one of the parties. The Judex facti/High Court in its judgment hesitated to say that the screenshot was not maintained integrity and the Public Prosecution did not conduct digital forensics on the Facebook status on which the charges were based, but the Judge still found the Defendant guilty of his actions.
Pemanfaatan Hasil Rekam Sidang Korupsi untuk Menghasilkan Putusan Berkeadilan Ridwan Ridwan
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 22, No 1 (2020): Vol. 22 No. 1, April 2020
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v22i1.14621

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui bagaimana korelasi rekam sidang korupsi dalam menunjang ketelitian hakim dalam rangka menjatuhkan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku korupsi. Dari penelitian ditawarkan model pengelolaan hasil rekam sidang korupsi yang dilakukan oleh hakim di pengadilan. Hal ini dilandasi bahwa penegakan hukum terkait tindak pidana korupsi memerlukan tingkat ketelitian dan kecermatan, namun tak boleh sengaja diperlambat. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif, yang dilakukan melalui proses wawancara terhadap hakim dan jaksa KPK. Pendekatan penelitiannya adalah yuridis normatif dan partisipatif. Melalui penelitian ini diketahui bahwa perekaman persidangan tindak pidana korupsi sangat penting dilakukan karena dapat membantu terkait kelengkapan berita acara persidangan. Penggunaan perekaman persidangan akan menghindari keraguan masyarakat atas putusan yang dilakukan oleh hakim, karena semua fakta persidangan dapat diputar kembali melalui video yang dihasilkan dalam perekaman tersebut. Pengelolaan hasil rekam sidang juga dapat digunakan panitera dalam penulisan berita acara persidangan dengan hasil yang lebih baik. Disarankan agar semua perkara tindak pidana korupsi dapat dilakukan perekaman persidangan untuk lebih memudahkan penulisan berita acara terutama untuk panitera pengganti. Utilization of Corruption Trial Recording to Make A Justice Decision This study aims to find out how the correlation of corruption trial records in supporting the accuracy of judges in order to impose criminal sanctions against corruptors. The research offers a model for managing the results of records of corruption trials conducted by judges in court. This is based on that law enforcement related to corruption requires a level of accuracy and accuracy, but it should not be intentionally slowed down. This study uses a qualitative method, which is carried out through an interview process with KPK judges and prosecutors. The research approach is normative and participatory juridical. Through this research, it is known that the recording of trials of corruption is very important because it can help related to the completeness of the minutes of the trial. The use of court recording will avoid public doubts over the judge's decision, because all the facts of the trial can be played back through the video produced in the recording. Management of the results of court records can also be used by court clerks in writing minutes of proceedings with better results. It is recommended that all cases of corruption can be recorded in a trial to make it easier to write the minutes, especially for substitute registrars.
Co-Authors Amirulloh Ahdad Reine Rofiana