Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Muadalah Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Musawa : Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Hairul Hudaya
IAIN Antasari Banjarmasin
Religion Arts Humanities Education Social Sciences

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Hak Nafkah Isteri (Perspektif Hadis dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam) Hudaya, Hairul
Jurnal Muadalah Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Jurnal Muadalah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Hadith, as a second source of Islamic laws after the Qur’an, contains various provisions of the laws, including the rights of wifes livelihood. Meanwhile, in the context of law in Indonesia, Compilation of Islamic Laws is used as the legal basis in settling lawsuits in Religious Courts. The Compilation of Islamic Laws is compiled with considering the moeslem scholars thought especially they who adhere to al-Syafi’i notion. The theologians themselves are oriented to the Qur’an and Hadith in defining laws. Then, are there any differences between the laws products in the Compilation of Islamic Laws and the source of Islamic laws especially hadith concerning livelihood issues? It is found that the difference is when the wifes commit nusyuz, their reights will be eliminated. The notion is more likely based on the scholars judgement and it is not clearly elaborated in the Hadith.Keywords: livelihood, Compilation of Islamic Laws, nusyuzHadis, sebagai sumber hukum Islam kedua setelah Alquran, memuat berbagai ketentuan hukum termasuk dalam masalah hak nafkah isteri. Sementara itu, dalam konteks hukum di Indonesia, KHI menjadi dasar hukum dalam menyelesaikan perkara di lingkungan Peradilan Agama. KHI disusun dengan mempertimbangkan pemikiran para ulama terutama bermazhab al-Sya>fi’i>. Sedang ulama mazhab sendiri dalam menetapkan hukum tidak terlepas dari Alquran dan hadis. Lantas, adakah perbedaan antara produk hukum dalam KHI dengan sumber hukum Islam terutama hadis dalam masalah nafkah? Sejauh ini, perbedaan tersebut terletak pada gugurnya hak nafkah isteri apabila ia berlaku nusyuz. Pandangan tersebut lebih didasarkan pada pendapat ulama mazhab karena tidak ditemukan dasarnya secara tegas dan jelas dalam sejumlah kitab hadis.Kata Kunci: nafkah, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, nusyuz.
Hak Nafkah Isteri (Perspektif Hadis dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam) Hudaya, Hairul
Muadalah Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pemberdayaan Perempuan
Publisher : IAIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/jsga.v1i1.664

Abstract

Hadith, as a second source of Islamic laws after the Qur’an, contains various provisions of the laws, including the rights of wifes livelihood. Meanwhile, in the context of law in Indonesia, Compilation of Islamic Laws is used as the legal basis in settling lawsuits in Religious Courts. The Compilation of Islamic Laws is compiled with considering the moeslem scholars thought especially they who adhere to al-Syafi’i notion. The theologians themselves are oriented to the Qur’an and Hadith in defining laws. Then, are there any differences between the laws products in the Compilation of Islamic Laws and the source of Islamic laws especially hadith concerning livelihood issues? It is found that the difference is when the wifes commit nusyuz, their reights will be eliminated. The notion is more likely based on the scholars judgement and it is not clearly elaborated in the Hadith.
METODOLOGI KRITIK MATAN HADIS MENURUT AL-ADLABIDARI TEORI KE APLIKASI Hudaya, Hairul
Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 13, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora IAIN Antasari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/jiu.v13i1.701

Abstract

The validity of hadith is not only seen from the sanad aspect, but also from matan. Hadith scholars set two criteria forthe validity of the matan, both are avoid syaz and ‘illah. Disability element of matan at syaz lies in the contention ofthe matan. The ‘illah aspect of matan was because of the additional editorial matan when compared with other. Al-Adlabi formulated the criteria of the validity of matan based on four things namely; 1). It is not contradicting with theKoran; 2). It is not contrary with the valid hadith and sirah nabawiyah; 3). It is not contrary to reason, sense andhistory; and 4). It is similar with the prophetic word. If the formula of al-Adlabi’s matan criticism is seen in aspectsof syaz and ‘illah, then it appears that his offering is only covers one aspect of the syaz of matan criticism. While thecriteria of ‘illah have not been accommodated in the rule.
VALIDITAS PENAFSIRAN DALAM TAFSÎR BI AL-MA’TSÛR Hudaya, Hairul
Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 9, No 1 (2010): Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora IAIN Antasari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/jiu.v9i1.694

Abstract

There are three methods of interpretation used by commentators to interpret the Qur’anic verses, by riwayah, knownas tafsîr bi al-ma’tsûr, by logic known as tafsîr bi al-ra’yi and by al-isyâri. From three methods of interpretation,according to Ibn Taymiyyah, tafsîr bi al-ma’tsûr is the best method and valid. It is based on the belief that knows themeaning of the verse is Allah, the Prophet, and his companions. In fact, the commentary by al-ma’tsûr, not the wholeverse is interpreted by the Prophet, or friends but the majority carried out by commentators with ijtihadnya in placingthe Qur’an, Hadith and friends opinion when interpreting a verse. Thus, differences in interpretation among commentatorsbi al-ma’tsûr can not be avoided. In case of Abraham’s son who was sacrificed, for example, between al-Thabari, Ibn Katsîr and Ibn ‘Athiyyah had different opinions and attitudes of understanding of the verses. Whiletheir interpretation is called tafsîr bi al-ma’tsûr. Their different opinions indicate that al-tafsîr bi al-ma’tsûr also needa review of the validity, especially related to commentator’s thought in placing the explanation of Qur’an itself,Hadith and opinion in interpreting the Qur’anic verses
VALIDITAS PENAFSIRAN DALAM TAFSÎR BI AL-MA’TSÛRVALIDITAS PENAFSIRAN DALAM TAFSÎR BI AL-MA’TSÛRVALIDITAS PENAFSIRAN DALAM TAFSÎR BI AL-MA’TSÛR Hudaya, Hairul
Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 14, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora IAIN Antasari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/jiu.v14i2.688

Abstract

There are three methods of interpretation used by commentators to interpret the Qur’anic verses, by riwayah, known as tafsîr bi al-ma’tsûr, by logic known as tafsîr bi al-ra’yi and by al-isyâri. From three methods of interpretation,according to Ibn Taymiyyah, tafsîr bi al-ma’tsûr is the best method and valid. It is based on the belief that knows the meaning of the verse is Allah, the Prophet, and his companions. In fact, the commentary by al-ma’tsûr, not the whole verse is interpreted by the Prophet, or friends but the majority carried out by commentators with ijtihadnya in placing the Qur’an, Hadith and friends opinion when interpreting a verse. Thus, differences in interpretation among commentators bi al-ma’tsûr can not be avoided. In case of Abraham’s son who was sacrificed, for example, between al-Thabari, Ibn Katsîr and Ibn ‘Athiyyah had different opinions and attitudes of understanding of the verses. While their interpretation is called tafsîr bi al-ma’tsûr. Their different opinions indicate that al-tafsîr bi al-ma’tsûr also need a review of the validity, especially related to commentator’s thought in placing the explanation of Qur’an itself, Hadith and opinion in interpreting the Qur’anic verses.
MENGUJI KOMPLEKSITAS ‘ILLAH HADIS Hudaya, Hairul
Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 11, No 2 (2012): Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora IAIN Antasari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/jiu.v11i2.740

Abstract

One step of the verification of the validity of the hadith is to test the aspect of ‘illahwhether in sanad, content or the combination of both. ‘Illah is understood as a form ofhidden defects in the hadith. It distinguishes between mu’allal hadith and other weakhadith. The hadith scholars acknowledge that the research of ‘Illah aspect is one of themost difficult to test the validity of the hadith. To determine the complexity of ‘illahstudies, it is needed to review of the content and the chain of transmission of hadithwhich contained an ‘illah by the hadith scholars. The result proved that the proof of‘illah of a hadith was not easy. Hadith is born valid but apparently assessed withillah.
MENGUJI KOMPLEKSITAS ILLAH HADIS Hudaya, Hairul
Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 11, No 2 (2012): Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (433.587 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/jiu.v11i2.740

Abstract

One step of the verification of the validity of the hadith is to test the aspect of illahwhether in sanad, content or the combination of both. Illah is understood as a form ofhidden defects in the hadith. It distinguishes between muallal hadith and other weakhadith. The hadith scholars acknowledge that the research of Illah aspect is one of themost difficult to test the validity of the hadith. To determine the complexity of illahstudies, it is needed to review of the content and the chain of transmission of hadithwhich contained an illah by the hadith scholars. The result proved that the proof ofillah of a hadith was not easy. Hadith is born valid but apparently assessed withillah.
METODOLOGI KRITIK MATAN HADIS MENURUT AL-ADLABIDARI TEORI KE APLIKASI Hudaya, Hairul
Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 13, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (411.947 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/jiu.v13i1.701

Abstract

The validity of hadith is not only seen from the sanad aspect, but also from matan. Hadith scholars set two criteria forthe validity of the matan, both are avoid syaz and illah. Disability element of matan at syaz lies in the contention ofthe matan. The illah aspect of matan was because of the additional editorial matan when compared with other. Al-Adlabi formulated the criteria of the validity of matan based on four things namely; 1). It is not contradicting with theKoran; 2). It is not contrary with the valid hadith and sirah nabawiyah; 3). It is not contrary to reason, sense andhistory; and 4). It is similar with the prophetic word. If the formula of al-Adlabis matan criticism is seen in aspectsof syaz and illah, then it appears that his offering is only covers one aspect of the syaz of matan criticism. While thecriteria of illah have not been accommodated in the rule.
METODE SYARH HADIS DALAM KITAB FATH AL-BARY Hudaya, Hairul
Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (488.785 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/jiu.v16i2.1734

Abstract

Salah satu periode penting dalam sejarah perkembangan kitab hadis adalah munculnya syarah kitab hadis. Kitab syarah dipandang penting mengingat semakin melemahnya kemampuan umat muslim dalam memahami bahasa Arab dan khususnya makna kandungan hadis. Diantara kitab syarah hadis yang terpenting adalah kitab Fath al-Bary Syarh Shahih al-Bukhari karya Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani. Dalam menulis kitab tersebut, Ibn Hajar mengikuti sistematika penulisan yang ada pada kitab Shahih al-Bukhari. Sementara itu, dalam memahami hadis, ia banyak memuat hadis-hadis dari jalur sanad lain, al-Qur’an serta pandangan ulama mengenai istimbat hukumnya. Metode yang ia gunakan dalam kitab syarhnya adalah metode muqaran. Adapun pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan teologis-normatif dan historis. Sedang teknik interpretasinya adalah teknik interpretasi tekstualis.
VALIDITAS PENAFSIRAN DALAM TAFSĪR BI AL-MA’TSŪR Hudaya, Hairul
Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 14, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Humaniora UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (736.355 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/jiu.v14i2.688

Abstract

There are three methods of interpretation used by commentators to interpret the Quranic verses, by riwayah, knownas tafs bi al-mats, by logic known as tafs bi al-rayi and by al-isyi. From three methods of interpretation, according to Ibn Taymiyyah, tafs bi al-mats is the best method and valid. It is based on the belief that knows themeaning of the verse is Allah, the Prophet, and his companions. In fact, the commentary by al-mats, not the wholeverse is interpreted by the Prophet, or friends but the majority carried out by commentators with ijtihadnya in placingthe Quran, Hadith and friends opinion when interpreting a verse. Thus, differences in interpretation among commentatorsbi al-mats can not be avoided. In case of Abrahams son who was sacrificed, for example, between al-Thabari, Ibn Kats and Ibn Athiyyah had different opinions and attitudes of understanding of the verses. Whiletheir interpretation is called tafs bi al-mats. Their different opinions indicate that al-tafs bi al-mats also needa review of the validity, especially related to commentators thought in placing the explanation of Quran itself,Hadith and opinion in interpreting the Quranic verses.
Co-Authors