Johan Hutauruk
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document

Found 3 Documents

Six-month follow-up of laser in-situ keratomileusis for myopia Istiantoro, Istiantoro; Gondhowihardjo, Tjahjono D.; Hutauruk, Johan
Medical Journal of Indonesia Vol 8, No 4 (1999): October-December
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (736.45 KB) | DOI: 10.13181/mji.v8i4.719


[no abstract available]
Effectiveness of Piper betle leaf infusion as a palpebral skin antiseptic Amalia, Husnun; Sitompul, Ratna; Hutauruk, Johan; Andrianjah, Andrianjah; Mun’im, Abdul
Universa Medicina Vol 28, No 2 (2009)
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Trisakti University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18051/UnivMed.2009.v28.83-91


The goal of an antiseptic is to eliminate or greatly reduce the number of microorganisms in the surgical field at the time of the surgery. The objective of this study was to verify the effectiveness of 20% Piper betle leaf infusion as an antiseptic solution in pre-surgery cataract patients. A clinical trial with partner-matching design was conducted on 31 pairs of eyelids. From each pair of eyelids, one eyelid was asigned to the Piper betle infusion group and the opposite one to the povidone-iodine group. The microorganisms were collected by swab from the patient’s palpebral skin, inoculated on nutrient agar, and incubated at 37oC for 20 hours. The antiseptic effectiveness was measured by counting the microbial colonies before and after administration of the antiseptic solutions. This study demonstrates that the mean colony counts after application of 20% Piper betle leaf infusion showed a significant reduction of 27-100% compared with those before administration (p=0.001). Mean colony counts after 10% povidone-iodine administration showed a significant reduction of 88-100% compared with the mean counts before the solution was applied (p=0.000). The 20% Piper betle infusion has an antiseptic potential. Nevertheless, the 10% povidone-iodine solution has more effective antiseptic capability.
Vector Analysis of Anticipated Residual Astigmatism and Actual Residual Astigmatism in Toric IOL Implantation using Callisto-Eye Prasetyo, Kukuh; Pasaribu, Ucok; Riyanto, Setiyobudi; Hutauruk, Johan
Majalah Oftalmologi Indonesia Vol 43 No 1 (2017): Ophthalmologica Indonesiana
Publisher : The Indonesian Ophthalmologists Association (IOA, Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Mata Indonesia (Perdami))

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (804.471 KB) | DOI: 10.35749/journal.v43i1.145


Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the differences of actual residual astigmatism and anticipated residual astigmatism using Alpin’s Vector Analysis from toric IOL implantation using Image Guided System (Callisto EyeTM) and other method. Method: This was a retrospective case series study done in Jakarta Eyte Center. Data was taken consecutively from medical records of Toric IOL implantation from January 2016 to November 2017. Primary data taken were demographic data, anticipated residual astigmatism, refractive examination both subyectively and objectively. Secondary data was analized using Alpin’s Vector Analysis to substract anticipated residual astigmatism from actrual residual astigmatism. Spherical equivalent and axis shifting also taken from refractive ecamination results. Data was divided into subgrup of Toric IOL implantation using Image Guided System and subgrup of Toric IOL implantation using other method. Results: There was a statically significant difference of subjective refraction vector analysis result between subgroups with differnce of 0.312 dioptri (p value 0.004). Objective refraction vector analysis shows no statistically difference between two subgrups (p value 0.286). Spherical equivalent both subjectively and objectively not differ (p value 0.721 and 0,689). Axis shifting from refractive examination also not statistically significant differ between two subgrups (p value 0.432 and 0.358) Conclusion: Difference between actual residual astigmatism from subjective refraction and anticipated residual astigmatism is lower whrn usingCallisto EyeTM.