Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat

PROBLEMATIKA PENYELESAIAN PERKARA HADANAH DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KELAS 1 A PALEMBANG Arne Huzaimah
Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari'ah dan Masyarakat Vol 13 No 1 (2013): Nurani
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v13i1.114

Abstract

Abstrak: Where there is sugar there must be an ant, or like fishand water, as it were appropriate parable likens the Law andSociety, because where there is society there must be laws willbe needed. Law and society are two sides of which are difficultto separate, because they will need each other and influenceeach other.ملخص:حیث یوجد السكر یجب أن یكون ھناك نملة، أو مثل السمك والماء، كما انھاكانت مناسبة المثل یشبھ القانون والمجتمع، وذلك لأن عندما یكون ھناك مجتمع یجبأن یكون ھناك وستكون ھناك حاجة القوانین .القانون والمجتمع وجھان لوالتي یصعبفصل، لأنھا سوف نحتاج إلى بعضنا البعض وتؤثر على بعضھا البعض.Kata Kunci: hadanah, perceraian
URGENSI INTEGRASI ANTARA MEDIASI DAN HAKAM DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERCERAIAN DENGAN ALASAN SYIQAQ DI PENGADILAN AGAMA Arne Huzaimah
Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari'ah dan Masyarakat Vol 16 No 2 (2016): Nurani
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v16i2.931

Abstract

Settlement of disputes divorce on the grounds “syiqaq” have two mechanisms for peace, which is mediating in the initial examination of the case and making the appointments “hakam” were carried out after the process of verification. Mediator and “hakam” same function, namely as a neutral party to reconcile the two sides of a dispute. This of course raises another problem where the dualism of law and overlapping carried out by two different agencies in one point. When taken in conjunction with the principle of justice that is simple, fast and inexpensive, of course, can lead to the length and complexity of the dispute resolution process for divorce on the grounds “syiqaq” between mediation and “hakam”  have mechanisms respectively. Although on the other hand, the institution of mediation and “hakam” was to embody the principle of compulsory reconciling the parties in the process of judicial civil procedure law agama. In addition, in spite of the mediation and the appointment of “hakam”  in the dispute resolution process of divorce on the grounds “syiqaq”  as an attempt to reconcile the two parties dispute, but peace efforts have not achieved the expected results, the divorce rate remains high and even increasing every year. Therefore, there should be integration between mediation and “hakam” as a single entity in the settlement process of a divorce on the grounds “syiqaq”. Urgency integration between mediation and “hakam”  in the completion of a divorce case on the grounds “syiqaq”  are to: simplifies the process of settlement of a divorce case on the grounds “syiqaq”; Religious Court of Justice to embody the principle is simple, quick and inexpensive; re-establish the Islamic shariah on the mechanism for settling disputes “syiqaq”  in the religious and synergize with positive law in Indonesia; and the last to discuss for alternatives in addressing divorce rate in Indonesia.
MENELAAH PELAKSANAAN PENGANGKATAN HAKAM PADA PERKARA SYIQAQ DI PENGADILAN AGAMA INDONESIA DAN MAHKAMAH SYAR’IYAH MALAYSIA Arne Huzaimah
Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari'ah dan Masyarakat Vol 19 No 1 (2019): Nurani
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v19i1.1940

Abstract

Syiqaq is a constant dispute and quarrel between husband and wife. To overcome the problem of syiqaq, then Allah SWT has arranged it directly in the Qur'an, the letter an-Nisa (4) verse 35, namely by adopting the hakam that comes from the family of each party to reconcile the two husband and wife. The implementation of the appointment of the rights applied in the procedural law of the religious court in Indonesia is not imperative, it all depends on the judge's judgment. Hakam in the Indonesian Religious Court only functions to reconcile the two parties (husband and wife) who are at loggerheads and not the authority to decide. So Hakam only serves as a mediator not an arbitrator. At the Malaysian Syar'iyyah Court, Hakam must obtain full authority from his principal. Husband may give full authority to the husband Hakam to pronounce divorce to his wife before the Court, and the wife can give full power to his wife Hakam to do khuluk or accept Lafaztalak before the Court. keywords: Hakam, Pengadilan Agama, Mahkamah Syar’iyyah
REFORMULASI HUKUM ACARA PERADILAN AGAMA DALAM PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN “HADHANAH” Arne Huzaimah
Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari'ah dan Masyarakat Vol 18 No 2 (2018): Nurani
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v18i2.1942

Abstract

Abstrak Pelaksanaan eksekusi putusan hadhanah masih terdapat beberapa hambatan sehingga eksekusi putusan hadhanah tidak dapat dilaksanakan. Belum adanya aturan formal yang secara khusus mengatur masalah teknis eksekusi anak. Dengan demikian, khusus masalah eksekusi anak sampai saat ini dapat dikatakan tengah terjadi kekosongan aturan atau kekosongan undang-undang (vacuum). Reformulasi Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama dalam Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Hadhanah adalah menerapkan lembaga dwangsom pada saat mengajukan perkara hadhanah ke pengadilan agama. Lembaga dwangsom dapat menjadi instrumen eksekusi jika penggugat yakin bahwa tergugat tidak akan mau melaksanakan putusan hakim dan yakin bahwa pelaksanaan eksekusi dilapangan akan mengalami kesulitan. Lembaga dwangsom dapat menjadi solusi preventif, di mana dengan adanya hukuman dwangsom, tergugat secara psychis akan merasa tertekan untuk segera melaksanakan putusan hakim yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap secara sukarela. Selain itu, Ada upaya lain yang dapat dilakukan dalam pelaksanaan putusan hadhanah di pengadilan agama, di mana sebelum pengucapan putusan, Ketua Majelis Hakim dapat memanggil dan memerintah pihak tergugat secara sukarela menyerahkan anak dengan cara baik-baik kepada pihak penggugat, apa lagi jika diketahui bahwa anak lebih dekat dengan penggugat dari pada dengan tergugat. Hal ini tentunya dapat dilakukan jika pihak tergugat mau mendengarkan saran hakim sebelum perkara hadhanah tersebut diputus dan mempertimbangkan kepentingan kemaslahatan anak, sehingga putusan yang akan diucapkan nanti tidak menjadi ilusoir (hampa).