Marsigit Marsigit
Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Perbandingan keefektifan metode problem-based learning dan project-based learning pada pembelajaran statistika SMA Erlina Dwi Prasekti; Marsigit Marsigit
PYTHAGORAS Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 12, No 2: December 2017
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, UNY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (437.084 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/pg.v12i2.17714

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan metode pembelajaran Problem-based learning (PBL) dan metode pembelajaran Project-based learning (PjBL) serta perbandingan keefektifan metode PBL dan metode PjBL pada pembelajaran statistika SMA kelas XI ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan pemecahan masalah, dan sikap matematika siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi experiment dengan pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. Adapun populasi adalah siswa kelas XI IIS SMA Negeri 1 Pringsewu, Lampung. Sampel dipilih secara acak dari populasi yaitu kelas XI IIS1 dan XI IIS2. Untuk menguji keefektifan metode pembelajaran, data dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji one sample t-test. Untuk menguji perbandingan keefektifan metode pembelajaran, data dianalisis dengan menggunakan MANOVA yang dilanjutkan dengan uji t-Bonferroni. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa metode PBL dan PjBL efektif serta metode PBL lebih efektif dibandingkan dengan metode PjBL pada pembelajaran statistika SMA kelas XI ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan pemecahan masalah, dan sikap matematika siswa. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning and Project-Based Learning Method in the Teaching of Statistics of Senior High School AbstractThis study aims to describe the effectiveness of Problem-based learning (PBL) and Project-based learning (PjBL) method and the compare effectiveness of PBL and PjBL methods viewed from students’ learning achievement, problem solving skill, and mathematical attitude. This study was quasi-experimental research using the pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. The population was all grade XI students of IIS SMA Negeri 1 Pingsewu, Lampung. Two classes of the population, namely classes XI IIS1 and Class XI IIS2, were randomly established as the study sample. To test the effectiveness of the PBL and PjBL methods was tested using one sample t-test. To compare effectiveness of PBL and PjBL methods, the MANOVA was used, followed by t-Bonferroni test. The results show that the PBL and PjBL methods are effective and the PBL is more effective than PjBL in in teaching statistics to grade XI students of senior high school viewed from students’ learning achievement, problem solving skill, and mathematical attitudes.
Keefektifan PBL setting STAD dan TGT ditinjau dari prestasi, berpikir kritis, dan self-efficacy Uun Yuni Armita; Marsigit Marsigit
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains Vol 4, No 1 (2016): June 2016
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (695.977 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/jpms.v4i1.12936

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan: keefektifan PBL setting STAD ditinjau dari prestasi, berpikir kritis, dan self-efficacy; keefektifan PBL setting TGT ditinjau dari prestasi, berpikir kritis, dan self-efficacy; perbandingan keefektifan PBL setting STAD dengan PBL setting TGT ditinjau dari prestasi, berpikir kritis, dan self-efficacy. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu, dengan rancangan pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison-group. Populasi penelitian mencakup seluruh siswa kelas VII MTs N Sleman Kota, dari populasi yang ada diambil secara acak dua kelas sebagai sampel penelitian. Untuk menguji keefektifan PBL setting STAD dan TGT digunakan one sample t-test. Selanjutnya, untuk membandingkan keefektifan PBL setting STAD dan TGT, dianalisis menggunakan uji T2 Hotteling’s. Karena terdapat perbedaan keefektifan, maka dilanjutkan uji t-univariat. Setiap analisis dilakukan pada taraf signifikansi 5%. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: PBL setting STAD efektif ditinjau dari prestasi, berpikir kritis, dan self-efficacy; PBL setting TGT efektif ditinjau dari prestasi, berpikir kritis, dan self-efficacy; PBL setting TGT lebih efektif dibandingkan PBL setting STAD ditinjau dari berpikir kritis. Namun, PBL setting TGT sama efektif dibandingkan PBL setting STAD ditinjau dari prestasi dan self-efficacy.Kata Kunci: PBL setting STAD, PBL setting TGT, prestasi, berpikir kritis, self-efficacy The Effectiveness PBL of STAD and TGT Type In Terms Of The Achievements, Critical Thinking, and Self-Efficacy AbstractThis research aims to describe: the effectiveness PBL of STAD type in terms of the achievements, critical thinking, and self-efficacy; the effectiveness PBL of TGT type in terms of the achievements, critical thinking, and self-efficacy; comparative effectiveness the PBL of STAD type  with the PBL of TGT type in terms of the achievements, critical thinking, and self-efficacy. This research was a quasi-experimental research with the pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison-group design. The research population included all 7th grade students of MTs N Sleman Kota, from the population two classes were randomly selected as the research sample. To test the effectiveness of PBL of STAD and TGT type, the one sample t-test was used. Furthermore, to compare the effectiveness of the PBL of STAD and TGT type, the data were analyzed using the multivariate test of the T2 Hotteling’s. Because there were differences in effectiveness, then further t-univariate test was done. Each analysis was performed at the significance level of 5%. The results show that: the PBL of STAD type is effective in terms of achievement, critical thinking, and self-efficacy; the PBL of TGT type is effective in terms of achievement, critical thinking, and self-efficacy; the PBL of TGT type is more effective than that using the PBL of STAD type in terms of critical thinking. But, the PBL of TGT type is as effective as that using the PBL of STAD type in terms of achievement and self-efficacy.Keywords: PBL of STAD type, PBL of TGT type, achievement, critical thinking, self-efficacy
Implementasi pendidikan karakter dalam pembelajaran matematika SMP di Kota Yogyakarta Indah Pertiwi; Marsigit Marsigit
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Vol 4, No 2: November 2017
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Program Pascasarjan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (832.12 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.11241

Abstract

Penelitian bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan implementasi, faktor pendukung dan penghambat penerapan pendidikan karakter dalam pembelajaran matematika SMP di Kota Yogyakarta. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian evaluasi model discrepancy model dengan pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Penelitian melibatkan sampel sebanyak 22 SMP untuk pengumpulan data kuantitatif dan 6 SMP untuk pengumpulan data kualitatif. Hasil evaluasi dapat disimpulkan bahwa implementasi pendidikan karakter dalam pembelajaran matematika SMP di Kota Yogyakarta termasuk dalam kategori cukup. Adapun faktor pendukung adalah (1) visi dan misi sekolah; (2) adanya peraturan dan tata tertib yang telah diatur sekolah, (3) dukungan dan kerjasama yang baik antar warga sekolah; (4) kondisi siswa yang memiliki dasar karakter baik; (5) contoh perilaku positif guru sebagai teladan. Sedangkan faktor penghambat adalah (1) guru belum memiliki pemahaman yang memadai tentang konsep pendidikan karakter dalam pembelajaran matematika; (2) guru mengalami kesulitan dalam mengidentifikasi nilai karakter dari kompetensi dasar pada mata pelajaran matematika; (3) guru belum dapat mengimplementasikan pendidikan karakter yang terintegrasi dalam pembelajaran matematika dengan baik; (4) sarana dan prasarana yang belum lengkap; (5) dokumentasi penilaian sikap siswa masih lemah. Character Education Implementation in Mathematics Teaching and Learning of Junior High School in Yogyakarta AbstractThe aim of this research was to describe the implementation, supporting factors and obstacles the implementation of character education in mathematics teaching and learning of junior high school in Yogyakarta. This research is an evaluation research discrepancy model with the quantitative and qualitative approach. The study involved 22 samples of SMP for quantitative data collection and 6 SMP for qualitative data collection. The results from this study revealed that character education implementation in mathematics teaching and learning of junior high schools in Yogyakarta was good. Supporting factors were: (1) the vision and mission of the school; (2) ground rules that have been designed by the schools; (3) support and cooperation among school members; (4) student’s condition who have a basic good character; and (5) examples of positive behavior of teachers as role models. Obstacles were: (1) teachers do not have enough understanding of character education especially in the implementation in mathematics teaching and learning processes; (2) teachers have difficulties to identify the character values from the basic competence of mathematics; (3) teachers have not been able to implement character education integrated to mathematics teaching and learning processes properly; (4) poor teaching and learning facilities in some schools; and (5) poor documentation of students’ character assessment.