Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum
Yudha Ramelan
Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENERAPAN SAKSI PIDANA KORPORASI PADA BANK DAN IMPLIKASINYA Yudha Ramelan
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 48, No 1 (2019): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (587.245 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.48.1.2019.80-97

Abstract

A criminal act by corporation is criminal offense that can be asked for criminal liability to the  corporation in accordance with the laws and regulations concerning the corporation. Banks as corporate legal entities can be prosecuted before the law and tried if in carrying out their business activities the bank is suspected of committing a crime that is threatened with criminal sanction, including committing a crime of money laundering or corruption. Corporation  can be punished  to pay fine penalties and other additional penalties such as dissolution or revocation of business licenses. As a trust-based financial institution, if a bank commits a crime, the impact caused by the crime is not only detrimental to the bank itself, damages the reputation of the bank but also harms the community of depositors and other parties responsible for handling bank resolutions. Looking at the impact, the application of corporate criminal responsibility to banks must be carried out carefully and selectively. If these sanctions happen to a large-scale bank (systemic bank),  it can be multiple effects cause.
PERANAN LEMBAGA MERGER SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN RESOLUSI BANK (KONSEP DAN IMPLIKASINYA PADA BANK DALAM PENYELAMATAN) Yudha Ramelan; Dwinanto Prakoso
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 4 Nomor 2 Maret 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRAK Fokus pembahasan ditujukan untuk menelaah efektifitas penggunaan lembaga merger antara bank dalam penyelamatan Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS) dengan bank lainnya yang bisa bermakna sesama bank dalam penyelamatan dan/atau bank diluar bank dalam penyelamatan, kapan waktu penerapannya, bagaimana dapat dikatakan sebagai alternatif resolusi, serta friksi yang timbul dalam proses merger berkenaan dengan masalah penguasaan dan pengendalian bank hasil merger. Untuk itu diperlukan adanya dukungan kebijakan dalam bentuk aturan hukum yang dipublikasi. Kata kunci: alternatif; dampak hukum; merger; resolusi bank. ABSTRACT The focus of this paper is to explore the effectiveness of the use of merger institutions between banks in saving by Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC or LPS) with other banks that can mean fellow banks in the rescue and/or banks outside the bank in the rescue, when the time of its application, how it can be said as an alternative bank resolution, and friction that arises in the merger process with regard to the problem of control and control of the merged bank. For this reason, policy support is needed in the form of published legal rules. Keywords: alternative; bank resolution, law impact, merger.
Co-Authors Dwinanto Prakoso