Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : IBLAM Law Review

KELALAIAN PPAT ATAS PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM ANAK TIRI PEMBELI TERHADAP TUNA AKSARA Tommy Leonard; Benny Benny
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v3i2.251

Abstract

The deed made by PPAT is an authentic official document so that PPAT in making deeds must be in accordance with the procedures of the Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia concerning Regulations on the Position of Land Deed Making Officers. However in making PPAT deeds, it is often found that the lack of professionalism of PPAT in carrying out legal actions results in the deeds made by PPAT experiencing losses to the parties in the future. This research was conducted so that PPAT is able and able to carry out their duties well in serving the unemployed community who want to do legal actions. This research uses normative juridical case study research with the approach of laws and regulations and government regulations. It is still found in case study number : 186/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Dpk. that PPAT was negligent in carrying out its duties in making Deed of Sale and Purchase No.168/2015 for the illiterate. therefore, PPAT does not carry out its proper obligations and is contrary to Article 22 of Government Regulation No.37 of 1998. Based on the results of the determination, the Deed of Sale and Purchase No.121./2016 is invalid and null and void.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERJANJIAN PERDAMAIAN PADA PROSES PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG Tommy Leonard; Yolanda C. Irianda Panjaitan
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v3i3.259

Abstract

Peace agreements are crucial to PKPU's goal of helping creditors restructure their debts. This research addresses how to arrange the peace agreement as a debt restructuring step in the Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU), how it is used in the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations process in Decision Number 90/Pdt.PKPU/2020/PN Niaga.Jkt.Pst, and how the ratification of the peace agreement is related to the absence of a Compensation for Services for the Management Team agreement. This thesis uses normative legal descriptive analysis—literature-based data collecting. Data analysis was qualitative. Peace agreements as debt restructuring in PKPU are regulated under Articles 265-294 of the Civil Code in Chapter III of the PKPU UUK. The debt restructuring and receivables collection allowed the Debtor to enhance his business conditions under the peace agreement. The judge granted the peace agreement in the PKPU process in Decision Number 90/Pdt.PKPU/ 2020/Pn.Jkt.Pst based on legal considerations based on Article 281 paragraph (1) letters a and b UUK PKPU. There is no reason to reject the debtor's peace plan despite criticism from one creditor. The peace agreement was ratified without a Management Team compensation agreement in the PKPU procedure in Decision Number 90/Pdt. The judge, PKPU/2020/Pn.Jkt.Pst, stated that the Management Team's pay could be established separately after the Homologation Decision. Therefore, the Ratification of the Peace should be accepted.