Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : i-Latinnotary Journal: Internasional Journal of Latin Notary

JURIDIC ANALYSIS OF INDEPENDENT COMPANY ESTABLISHMENT POST GOVERNMENT REGULATION NUMBER 8 YEAR 2021 Elvira Fitriani Pakpahan; Tommy Leonard; Syahruddin Nasution
International Journal of Latin Notary Vol 1 No 2 (2021): Internasional Journal of Latin Notary, Vol. 1, No. 2, March 2021
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/journal.v1i2.29

Abstract

Abstract An individual company is a business entity that is a legal entity and is independently providing a glimmer of hope for the community in the form of convenience in the establishment, change, revocation of the company, and the legality of an individual company. In article 1 number 1 of Government Regulation Number 8 of 2021 it is stated that individual legal entities meet the criteria for micro and small businesses as stipulated in article 2 paragraph 1 letter b that the establishment of an individual company can be established by 1 (one) person by taking legal action in the form of making an electronic statement of the establishment to the minister, research problems on how to change the company, dissolution of an individual company after Government Regulation Number 8 of 2021, what is the legality and position of a sole proprietorship after Government Regulation Number 8 of 2021.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE IMPOSITION OF RESTRICTIONS ON EMERGENCY COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES FOR CORONA VIRUS DISEASE (PPKM) IN RELATION TO POSITIVE LAW IN INDONESIA Elvira Fitriani Pakpahan; Tommy Leonard; Darwis Darwis
International Journal of Latin Notary Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Internasional Journal of Latin Notary, Vol. 2, No. 1, September 2021
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/journal.v2i1.31

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal basis for implementing Emergency PPKM and sanctions if the community violates Emergency PPKM. This research is a type of normative juridical law research. To obtain the data needed in this study, literature research was used and then analyzed qualitatively by collecting primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials related to research. Based on the results of data analysis, the results obtained: The legal basis for implementing Emergency PPKM based on the perspective of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia is the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 4 of 1984 concerning Outbreaks of Infectious Diseases in Article 1 to Article 6 while sanctions are regulated in Article 14 paragraph (1) to paragraph (3) and the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine in Article 9 while sanctions are only given to the captain, pilot captain and person in charge of land transportation with the overall implementation regulated in government regulations where government regulations are statutory regulations determined by the President to carry out the law properly, The benefits of the Emergency PPKM being implemented are to suppress the spread of the covid-19 virus in certain activities or in non-essential activities as a form of follow-up to the direction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia because people do not understand the importance of implementing health protocols so that there is an increase in people exposed to the corona virus every day, The sanctions given if the public violates the Emergency PPKM do not have a strong legal basis and the issuance of the Instruction of the Minister of Home Affairs is not appropriate because Indonesia is still in a state of emergency based on Presidential Decree Number: 11 of 2020 concerning the Determination of the Covid-19 Public Health Emergency so that emergency handling must refer to Presidential Decree Number: 11 of 2020 concerning the Determination of the Covid-19 Public Health Emergency or through a Government Regulation.
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY OF VACCINE PROVIDER ON THE IMPACT OF POST IMMUNIZATION FOLLOWING EVENT (AEFI) AFTER VACCINATION Willy Tanjaya; Tommy Leonard; Leonardus Mirzal Lumban Gaol
International Journal of Latin Notary Vol. 2 No. 02 (2022): Internasional Journal of Latin Notary, March 2022
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/journal.v2i02.41

Abstract

Health has a broad meaning and dimension according to the definition according to WHO and the Health Law, namely a healthy state which includes physical, mental, spiritual and social aspects and can be socially and economically productive. This shows that a person's health status is not only measured from physical and mental aspects, but is also assessed based on social or economic productivity. In early 2020 the world was shocked by the outbreak of a new virus named by the World Health Organization (WHO) Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 and the name of the disease as corona virus disease 2019 (Covid-19). One way to suppress its growth rate is that the Central Government will take action to vaccinate people in Indonesia so that the spread of the Covid 19 virus does not increase. However, Recently, there have been several reports related to the administration of vaccines with the type of vaccine that experiences a lot of Post-Immunization Adverse Events (AEFI) such as fever, chills, headache, and body aches and weakness. For the impact of the AEFI, the public often blames health workers and even accuses them of medical malpractice In the implementation of the COVID-19 vaccination, it is also obligatory for every citizen to vaccinate. Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 10 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Vaccination in the Context of Combating the 2019 Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19) Pandemic Article 46 Paragraph (1), Paragraph (2), and Paragraph (3) then the government has legal responsibility, if the vaccine organizers follow the Operational Standards that have been established.It is recommended to the central government in issuing new rules related to the handling of Covid 19 and the implementation of vaccinations must be in line with and must not conflict with existing laws and regulations, especially regarding Human Rights (HAM) and the rights of citizens to determine systems and procedures. ways to maintain their health in a responsible manner, including vaccination, which should be one of the choices in health care society and not to be forced.