Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

MODEL PENYELESAIAN SECARA ALTERNATIF DALAM PERADILAN PIDANA (STUDI KHUSUS TERHADAP MODEL PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA OLEH LEMBAGA KEPOLISIAN) Sudaryono Sudaryono; Muhammad Iksan; Kuswardani Kuswardani
Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora Vol 13, No 1: Februari, 2012
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/humaniora.v13i1.917

Abstract

The problem statements of this study include: 1) what are the types of criminal cases handled by the police; 2) how do the police handle the cases; and 3); how do the police’s insight of handling them alternatively. In the first year, the study aims to 1) establish the types of criminal cases handled by the police; 2) inventory the ways the police handle them; and (3) describe the police’s insight of a model for handling those alternatively. Hopefully, it can be beneficial for academicians and policy makers. For the academicians, it can be meaningful to contribute to criminal law development, particularly an alternative model for handling criminal cases. For the policy makers, it can be useful to develop a conceptual thinking to make a policy of handling criminal cases oriented to substantive justice.The study is a research of sociological law with qualitative approach. For this, the data included primary and secondary. The data employed a content analysis with legal and theoretical interpretations.Reserch product: In running its juridical responsibility, from January to May, 2011 the Polresta Surakarta has handled a variety of criminal cases. The types of these cases handled by the Polresta in 2011, particularly for five months, consisted of 33 cases. Out of the 2 felony cases were conventional at 25 criminal cases and unconventional (transnational) at 8 criminal cases. In handling the criminal cases, the Polresta Surakarta uses a fixed procedure as a reference to them, as stipulated in the Act of the Criminal Code, operating rule and guidance and technique of the Indonesian Police Administration. In facing the implication of the ADR to handle criminal cases, the Police have actually taken a better action. In the Telegram of the Criminal Investigation Bureau (STR), the Sub-Division of the STR of the Indonesian Police No ST/110/V/2011, dated on May 18, 2001 on the Implication Guidance of the ADR in the Rank of the STR of the Indonesian Police, the STR of the Indonesia Police will apply the ADR to handle criminal cases. Unfortunately, the policy is delayed with the Telegram of the STR of the Indonesian Police No ST/209/IX/2011, dated September 6, 2001 on Delaying the Implication of the ADR in the Rank of the STR of the Indonesian Police.
SPIRITUAL VALUES OF CUSTOMARY LAW Kuswardani kuswardani; Marisa Kurnianingsih; Andria Luhur Prakoso
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol 8, No 1 (2018): Vol 8, No 1, 2018
Publisher : Muhammadiyah University Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v8i1.6267

Abstract

Recognition of living law in society or customary law / unwriten law, marking a pluralistic spiritual life that have law. Lawmakers (legislative or judge) must accommodate those values in their legal products. Moreover, judges as formers of practical law are obliged to explore and understand the values that live in society, which is the soul of the nation's personality (volkgeist), which is reflected through its Verdicts, so that the verdict can have transcendental values / spiritual values. The enactment of customary law as the basis of the Verdict of the judge or in other words the formation of the law by the judge through the Verdicts based on customary law, has existed before the Indonesian constitution is amended, namely in Article 5 paragraph (3) sub b Act No. 1/1951 About Measures - Temporary Measures for Conducting the Union of Suspended Power and Events of the Civil Courts.
Pemakaian Tanah Tanpa Izin: (Studi Terhadap Putusan Nomor: 40/Pid.C/2016/PN.Lbp) Niyan Ayu Saputri; Kuswardani Kuswardani
Prosiding University Research Colloquium Proceeding of The 15th University Research Colloquium 2022: Bidang Pendidikan, Humaniora dan Agama
Publisher : Konsorsium Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah 'Aisyiyah (PTMA) Koordinator Wilayah Jawa Tengah - DIY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (184.834 KB)

Abstract

Tanah adalah tanah yang langsung dikuasai oleh negara dan tanah yang dipunyai dengan sesuatuhak oleh perseorangan atau badan hukum. Berdasarkan penjelasan ini, maka kedudukan tanahyang legal hanyalah berada dibawah kepemilikan yang sah oleh orang atau perseorangan danbadan hukum dengan wewenang penuh yang diberikan kepadanya dari Negara berdasarkanUndang-undang yang berlaku. Sering kali terjadi didalam kehidupan bahwa orang atau badanhukum mengklaim bahwa sebidang tanah adalah miliknya tanpa dasar kepastian hukum yangtetap. Karena seiring berjalannya waktu, penduduk yang bertempat tinggal di Indonesiajumlahnya meningkat. Seperti salah satu kasus di Namorambe dimana pelaku melakukan tindakpidana berupa memakai tanah tanpa izin yang sah atau kuasanya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untukmengetahui tentang konsep larangan pemakaian tanah tanpa izin berdasarkan UU No. 51 PRPTahun 1960 tentang Larangan Pemakaian Tanah Tanpa Izin Yang Berhak atau Kuasanya, sertamengetahui bagaimana unsur kesalahan yang terdapat dalam salah satu kasus di Namorambe.Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian YuridisNormatif. Jenis data yang disajikan berupa data sekunder. Serta untuk analisis datamenggunakan metode content analysis. Hasil penelitian ini berupa konsep larangan dan unsurkesalahan dalam pemakaian tanah tanpa izin. Kegunaan penelitian untuk mengetahui tentanglarangan pemakaian tanpa izin. Sehingga kesimpulan akhir dalam penelitian ini adalahmengetahui konsep pemakaian tanah tanpa izin dalam Putusan No. 30/Pid.C/2014/PN.Lbp adalahterdakwa mengolah tanah dengan cara menanami tanaman ubi kayu, pisang, papaya dan jagungyang hasilnya dinikmati sendiri tanpa persetujuan orang yang berhak atau ahli waris terdakwa.Serta adanya prinsip kesalahan pelaku didasarkan pada Pasal 2 Jo Pasal 6 ayat (1) huruf a UUPERPU No. 51 Tahun 1960 tentang Larangan Pemakaian Tanah Tanpa Izin Yang Berhak atauKuasanya,
PERBUATAN SEKSUAL ATAS DASAR SUKA SAMA SUKA DI LUAR PERKAWINAN (Kajian Perspektif Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Islam) Arya Candra Abhitama; Kuswardani Kuswardani
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7, No 1 (2023): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v7i1.6293

Abstract

Violence in English is called violence, which is a diction which includes the phrase vis so that it has a definition of power and power, then latus which has the definition of bringing. The problem to be studied in this paper is how to regulate consensual sexual acts outside of marriage according to criminal law and Islamic law. With this writing, it aims to find out how the law regulates consensual sexual acts. Sexual acts which are carried out voluntarily can be punishable by crime when carried out with a husband or wife who has intercourse with the opposite sex who is not a married partner or with someone where it is known or suspected that the person is not yet an adult. Protection of victims of acts of consensual acts against minors who are not in marriage can be prosecuted under Article 293 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code (KUHP) where a minor is based on Article 330 of the Civil Code, namely a person who has not reaching the age of 21 have never been married. In Islam there is a desire for normal and free sexual relations with marriage ties with the intention of worshiping Allah. Islam views sexual relations with no sacred ties or marriage as something that is said to be vile. 
KEJAHATAN TERHADAP PERKAWINAN (PERKEMBANGANNYA DALAM HUKUM PIDANA POSITIF INDONESIA) Rio Anggoro Priyambodo; Kuswardani Kuswardani
Jurnal Yustisiabel Vol 7, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Luwuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32529/yustisiabel.v7i1.2411

Abstract

The crime against marriage is for anyone who holds a marriage when knowing that marriages or marriages that have existed become a barrier to the legality of the marriage. Therefore, it is important to review a positive criminal law in Indonesia regarding crimes against marriage. This research is an empirical juridical research that then the data will be analyzed in a cailiative-normative manner, examining by interpreting by inferring the data contained in the statutory documents. In qualitative methods, it is built on secondary data in the form of theory, meaning and substance from various literatures and laws and regulations so that conclusions are reached. The results showed that crimes against marriage based on the Criminal Code in positive criminal law in Indonesia, namely crimes and violations are threatened with punishment which is suffering or torture for the person concerned. However, there are still types of crimes regulated outside the Criminal Code, known as "special crimes" such as corruption, subversion, narcotics, economic crimes. Violation is a minor criminal act, the threat of punishment is in the form of a fine or confinement. All criminal acts that are classified as violations are regulated in book III of the Criminal Code. Crimes against marriage based on Islamic law, namely in Islam when someone commits a crime, there must be criminal responsibility. Islam divides the two in regulating Islamic criminal punishment, first jarimah hudud which is the punishment given to criminal perpetrators in accordance with the Qur'an and hadith. The two jarimah takzir, namely the criminal sanctions imposed on criminals are not contained in the Qur'an and this hadith of punishment is determined by the ruler.
Pemakaian Tanah Tanpa Izin: (Studi Terhadap Putusan Nomor: 40/Pid.C/2016/PN.Lbp) Niyan Ayu Saputri; Kuswardani Kuswardani
Prosiding University Research Colloquium Proceeding of The 15th University Research Colloquium 2022: Bidang Pendidikan, Humaniora dan Agama
Publisher : Konsorsium Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah 'Aisyiyah (PTMA) Koordinator Wilayah Jawa Tengah - DIY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tanah adalah tanah yang langsung dikuasai oleh negara dan tanah yang dipunyai dengan sesuatuhak oleh perseorangan atau badan hukum. Berdasarkan penjelasan ini, maka kedudukan tanahyang legal hanyalah berada dibawah kepemilikan yang sah oleh orang atau perseorangan danbadan hukum dengan wewenang penuh yang diberikan kepadanya dari Negara berdasarkanUndang-undang yang berlaku. Sering kali terjadi didalam kehidupan bahwa orang atau badanhukum mengklaim bahwa sebidang tanah adalah miliknya tanpa dasar kepastian hukum yangtetap. Karena seiring berjalannya waktu, penduduk yang bertempat tinggal di Indonesiajumlahnya meningkat. Seperti salah satu kasus di Namorambe dimana pelaku melakukan tindakpidana berupa memakai tanah tanpa izin yang sah atau kuasanya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untukmengetahui tentang konsep larangan pemakaian tanah tanpa izin berdasarkan UU No. 51 PRPTahun 1960 tentang Larangan Pemakaian Tanah Tanpa Izin Yang Berhak atau Kuasanya, sertamengetahui bagaimana unsur kesalahan yang terdapat dalam salah satu kasus di Namorambe.Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian YuridisNormatif. Jenis data yang disajikan berupa data sekunder. Serta untuk analisis datamenggunakan metode content analysis. Hasil penelitian ini berupa konsep larangan dan unsurkesalahan dalam pemakaian tanah tanpa izin. Kegunaan penelitian untuk mengetahui tentanglarangan pemakaian tanpa izin. Sehingga kesimpulan akhir dalam penelitian ini adalahmengetahui konsep pemakaian tanah tanpa izin dalam Putusan No. 30/Pid.C/2014/PN.Lbp adalahterdakwa mengolah tanah dengan cara menanami tanaman ubi kayu, pisang, papaya dan jagungyang hasilnya dinikmati sendiri tanpa persetujuan orang yang berhak atau ahli waris terdakwa.Serta adanya prinsip kesalahan pelaku didasarkan pada Pasal 2 Jo Pasal 6 ayat (1) huruf a UUPERPU No. 51 Tahun 1960 tentang Larangan Pemakaian Tanah Tanpa Izin Yang Berhak atauKuasanya,