This Author published in this journals
All Journal USU LAW JOURNAL
Budiman Ginting Ginting
Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAKAN PEMBERHENTIAN DENGAN HORMAT PADA ANGGOTA POLRI (ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA MEDAN NOMOR 52/G.TUN/2005/PTUN-MDN) Anderson Sirongoringo Sirongoringo; Budiman Ginting Ginting; Pendastaren Tarigan Tarigan; Jelly Leviza
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 3, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (632.989 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT The regulation on the discharge of police officers is stipulated in Law No. 2/2002 on the Republic of Indonesia State Police and on PP (Government Regulation) No. 1/2003 on the Discharge of Police Officers. The legal enforcement in the case No. 52/G.TUN/2005/PTUN-MDN has been in line with the provision of the prevailing law of procedure. The obstacle faced by judges in executing the Ruling No. 52/G.TUN/2005/PTUN-MDN is caused by the legal provisions which do not firmly regulate the enforcement of execution of the Ruling of the State Administrative Court, the absence of enforcement institution as the executor of the ruling, and the absence of sanction on the non-compliance to the ruling. Plaintiffs’ obstacle in executing the ruling is also related to the absence of a firm regulation in Law No. 2/2002 and in PP No. 1/2003 related to the court’s ruling on discharge. Keywords: Honorable Discharge, Police Officers, Ruling of the State Administrative Court
SANKSI TINDAKAN SEBAGAI SARANA ALTERNATIF PENANGGULANGAN KEJAHATAN PSIKOTROPIKA BAGI PECANDU DAN PELAKU ANAK DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA Anggoro Wicaksono Wicaksono; Alvi Syahrin Syahrin; Budiman Ginting Ginting; Marlina Marlina
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 3, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (569.125 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT One problem arising from the use of narcotics and psychotropic substances by children addict. Children are protected by Law No. 3 of 1997 on the Juvenile Court in which action alternative sanction can be applied to children through the law. The question arises what if the addict child which distribute narcotics and psychotropic substances, whether punitive action is done through sanctions. These questions arise because the child is protected by law while the addict must be severely punished by law. Criminal offenses committed by a child should be seen and understood as a social phenomenon, meaning that one should not give a bad stigma or sign that the child is evil for committing a crime, but we must understand and give attention and affection to them. Judicial approach to the child who committed the crime should be closer to the approach persuasive, educational, psychological, which means as far as possible to avoid legal proceedings solely punitive, dropping mental (mental degradation) and face stigmatization that can inhibit the growth and maturity of a reasonable of children.