Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SAMPANG NOMOR 69/Pid.B/2012/PN.Spg. PRESPEKTIF HAK KEBEBASAN BERAGAMA DI INDONESIA Muwaffiq Jufri
Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 1, No 2 (2016): Desember 2016
Publisher : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (64.241 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/jippk.v1i2.9639

Abstract

the rights and freedom of religion is a constitutional right of citizens as guaranteed by the constitution. However, conflict, violence and prohibition on the right is still prevalent in various regions in Indonesia, only one is against followers of Syi'ah in Sampang. These events drove Tajul Muluk be convicted by Sampang District Court's Decision No.69/Pid.B/2012/PN.Spg. This event seemed to signal that the state is unable to protect the constitutional rights of citizens to believe in and follow a religion. Even countries participated as an actor against the rise of violence and a rejection of the Syi’ah community in Sampang. The attitude of such state is a form of a waiver of the principle of religious freedom guaranteed by the constitution.
PEMBATASAN TERHADAP HAK DAN KEBEBASAN BERAGAMA DI INDONESIA Muwaffiq Jufri
Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Juni 2016
Publisher : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (103.779 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/jippk.v1i1.5935

Abstract

As one of modern law state, Indonesia provides arrangement and guarantee of human rights and freedom of religion. Moreover, this guarantee is clearly stated in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945. It indicates the existence of human rights and freedom of religion is a constitutional right. Nevertheless, the limitations existed on freedom of religion set out in some legislations affect negatively due to unclear concept of those arrangements. It is became worsen when the limitations of provisions are actually used to justify the action of radicalism in the name of religion. Therefore, scientific studies about the conception of limitations on freedom of religion become urgent as a preventive step in order to avoid the misuse of provisions limitations in the freedom of religion
ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SAMPANG NOMOR 69/Pid.B/2012/PN.Spg. PRESPEKTIF HAK KEBEBASAN BERAGAMA DI INDONESIA Muwaffiq Jufri
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 1, No 2 (2016): Desember 2016
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (64.241 KB)

Abstract

the rights and freedom of religion is a constitutional right of citizens as guaranteed by the constitution. However, conflict, violence and prohibition on the right is still prevalent in various regions in Indonesia, only one is against followers of Syi’ah in Sampang. These events drove Tajul Muluk be convicted by Sampang District Court’s Decision No.69/Pid.B/2012/PN.Spg. This event seemed to signal that the state is unable to protect the constitutional rights of citizens to believe in and follow a religion. Even countries participated as an actor against the rise of violence and a rejection of the Syi’ah community in Sampang. The attitude of such state is a form of a waiver of the principle of religious freedom guaranteed by the constitution. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v1i22016p102
PEMBATASAN TERHADAP HAK DAN KEBEBASAN BERAGAMA DI INDONESIA Muwaffiq Jufri
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 1, No 1 (2016): Juni 2016
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (103.779 KB)

Abstract

As one of modern law state, Indonesia provides arrangement and guarantee of human rights and freedom of religion. Moreover, this guarantee is clearly stated in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945. It indicates the existence of human rights and freedom of religion is a constitutional right. Nevertheless, the limitations existed on freedom of religion set out in some legislations affect negatively due to unclear concept of those arrangements. It is became worsen when the limitations of provisions are actually used to justify the action of radicalism in the name of religion. Therefore, scientific studies about the conception of limitations on freedom of religion become urgent as a preventive step in order to avoid the misuse of provisions limitations in the freedom of religion. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v1i12016p040