Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

GAYA HIDUP HEDONISME MAHASISWI UNIVERSITAS RIAU DI KELURAHAN SIMPANG BARU KECAMATAN TAMPAN KOTA PEKANBARU Cici Febrianti; Swistantoro "
Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol 4, No 1: WISUDA FEBRUARI 2017
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research was conducted in Kelurahan Simpang Baru Kecamatan Tampan Kota Pekanbaru.The purpose of this study was to determine the forms of hedonism student lifestyle in Kelurahan Simpang Baru KecamatanTampan Kota Pekanbaru. This study titled “Lifestyle Hedonism Student in Kelurahan Simpang Baru KecamatanTampan Kota Pekanbaru”. Topics focus of this research is how the hedonistic lifestyle impacts students in Kelurahan Simpang Baru. Object Research is a student at the University of Riau domiciled in Kelurahan Simpang Baru. The sample in this study amounted to 10 people. The author uses descriptive quantitative method and the data were analyzed qualitatif and using retrieval techniques Puspoive sampling. Instruments of data are observation, questionnaires and documentation. From research conducted, the authors found that the consumption patterns coed Universitas Riau in Kelurahan Simpang Baru characterized by a pattern kosumsi such as: Needs Student In Entertainment, The World Tonight Will student needs,like to buy expensive things.Universitas Riau student hedonistic lifestyle has some positive and negative effects. The positive impact is composed of: foster self-confidence, expanding the scope of friendship. The negative impact of a hedonistic lifestyle Univeritas Riau student is: never satisfied, accustomed to living lavishly, fall behind in academic, lost their identity. The sophistication of technology, communication tools, and her fashionable outfit today has claimed the attention of young people should focus on preparing themselves for the future challenges that require thought and behavior are very rational. Keywords: Lifestyle, Students Consumption Pattern
Effect of Formulation Mixture of Herbicide IPA Glyphosate and Methyl metsulfuron on Ischaemum timorense Weeds cici febrianti; sarbino .; astina .
Jurnal Sains Pertanian Equator Vol 9, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Tanjungpura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26418/jspe.v9i1.36745

Abstract

The use of a single herbicide often cannot control all types of weeds. Increase the effects of weed control. This study aims to study the effectiveness of glyphosate and methyl metsulfuron herbicides to control the Ischaemum timorense weed and determine the nature of the mixture. This research was conducted from January to April 2019, for ± 4 months in the greenhouse and Pesticide Laboratory of the Faculty of Agriculture, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak. The research was arranged in random groups. The treatment consisted of 4 types of herbicides with five dose levels and 1 control, namely glyphosate (0, 0.188, 0.375, 0.750, 1.5, 3.0) l / ha, methyl metsulfuron (0, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160) g / ha, herbicide mixture A 240/10 SL (0, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00 2.00, 4.00) l / ha and mixed herbicide B 360/10 SL (0, 0 , 25, 0.50, 1.00, 2.00, 4.00) l / ha. The target weed is Ischaemum timorense, a grass weed which is planted in a 14 cm diameter pot and a target of 3 MST (Three weeks after planting a herbicide test is applied). The variables observed are the level of weed damage that was assessed through phytotoxicity scoring and weed dry weights and analysis of herbicide mixture properties. The results showed that the higher the dose of the herbicide that was given, the more effective the suppressor was in controlling weeds. Herbicides that have been able to restore weed growth include glyphosate (G3) at a dose of 0.750 l / ha, Methyl metsulfuron (M5) at a dose of 160 g / ha, A mixture of 240/10 SL (CG3) at a dose of 1.0 l / ha , Mixture B 360/10 SL (CB3) at a dose of 1.0 l / ha. A mixed herbicide A 240/10 SL with an LD50 value of 93.2 and a mixture of B 360/10 SL is 186.92 smaller than the LD50 value of a single glyphosate herbicide 186.83 and methyl metsulfuron 27.98. The index value of combination herbicide mixture A 240/10 SL is 1.0384 and herbicide mixture B 360/10 SL is 1.0262, thus the nature of the herbicide is not antagonistic.Keywords: Glyphosate, Methyl metsulfuron, LD50, Herbicide mixture.
Effect of Formulation Mixture of Herbicide IPA Glyphosate and Methyl metsulfuron on Ischaemum timorense Weeds cici febrianti; sarbino .; astina .
Jurnal Sains Pertanian Equator Vol 9, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Tanjungpura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26418/jspe.v9i1.36609

Abstract

The use of a single herbicide often cannot control all types of weeds. Increase the effects of weed control. This study aims to study the effectiveness of glyphosate and methyl metsulfuron herbicides to control the Ischaemum timorense weed and determine the nature of the mixture. This research was conducted from January to April 2019, for ± 4 months in the greenhouse and Pesticide Laboratory of the Faculty of Agriculture, Tanjungpura University, Pontianak. The research was arranged in random groups. The treatment consisted of 4 types of herbicides with five dose levels and 1 control, namely glyphosate (0, 0.188, 0.375, 0.750, 1.5, 3.0) l / ha, methyl metsulfuron (0, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160) g / ha, herbicide mixture A 240/10 SL (0, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00 2.00, 4.00) l / ha and mixed herbicide B 360/10 SL (0, 0 , 25, 0.50, 1.00, 2.00, 4.00) l / ha. The target weed is Ischaemum timorense, a grass weed which is planted in a 14 cm diameter pot and a target of 3 MST (Three weeks after planting a herbicide test is applied). The variables observed are the level of weed damage that was assessed through phytotoxicity scoring and weed dry weights and analysis of herbicide mixture properties. The results showed that the higher the dose of the herbicide that was given, the more effective the suppressor was in controlling weeds. Herbicides that have been able to restore weed growth include glyphosate (G3) at a dose of 0.750 l / ha, Methyl metsulfuron (M5) at a dose of 160 g / ha, A mixture of 240/10 SL (CG3) at a dose of 1.0 l / ha , Mixture B 360/10 SL (CB3) at a dose of 1.0 l / ha. A mixed herbicide A 240/10 SL with an LD50 value of 93.2 and a mixture of B 360/10 SL is 186.92 smaller than the LD50 value of a single glyphosate herbicide 186.83 and methyl metsulfuron 27.98. The index value of combination herbicide mixture A 240/10 SL is 1.0384 and herbicide mixture B 360/10 SL is 1.0262, thus the nature of the herbicide is not antagonistic.Keywords: Glyphosate, Methyl metsulfuron, LD50, Herbicide mixture.