Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

ANALISIS STRUKTUR PERSAINGAN INDUSTRI JASA PENDIDIKAN TINGGI KOMPUTER UNTUK MENENTUKAN MODEL STRATEGI BERSAING Prabowo, Harjanto; Abbas, Bahtiar Saleh; Margaret, Margaret
Industrial and Systems Engineering Assessment Journal (INASEA) Vol 5, No 2 (2004): INASEA Vol. 05 No. 2
Publisher : Industrial and Systems Engineering Assessment Journal (INASEA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purposes of this research is to know how high is the competition level in a computer high education service industry. Based on analysis, it can be concluded that the competition level in a computer high education service industry in Java Island is increasing in the future. But, the bargaining power in a computer high education service industry is getting weaker to the customer. Based on the competition level, the right strategy to perform is differentiate strategy focus.
PERSEPSI INVESTOR TERHADAP PERUBAHAN PENYAJIAN KEPENTINGAN NONPENGENDALI SEBELUM DAN SESUDAH BERLAKU EFEKTIFNYA PSAK 4 (REVISI 2009) Hidayat, Taufik; Margaret, Margaret
Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia Vol 13, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Departemen Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (357.216 KB) | DOI: 10.21002/jaki.2016.05

Abstract

This study aims to examine investors’ perception toward changes in noncontrolling interest presentation before and after the effective date of PSAK 4 (Revised 2009). The perception is determined from the value relevance of noncontrolling interest component, whether the value relevance is negative (liabilities) or positive (equity). PSAK 4 (1994) regulated that noncontrolling interests should be presented as mezzanine items, meanwhile PSAK 4 (Revised 2009) regulated that noncontrolling interests should be presented as equity in consolidated statement of financial position. Sample of this study consists of 137 listed companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from various industry sectors with six years observation. This study used regression method for panel data. The result shows that before the effective date of PSAK 4 (Revised 2009), investors perceived noncontrolling interests as equal to liabilities. After the effective date of PSAK 4 (Revised 2009), changes in noncontrolling interests presentation as equity do not change investors’ perception as equity. This result gives evidence that changes in presentation of an item in financial statement do not necessarily change investors’ perception toward a financial statement item.---Penelitian ini bertujuan menguji bagaimana persepsi investor terhadap perubahan penyajian kepentingan nonpengendali sebelum dan sesudah PSAK 4 (Revisi 2009) berlaku efektif. Persepsi tersebut ditentukan dari relevansi nilai atas komponen kepentingan nonpengendali, apakah relevansi nilainya negatif (liabilitas) atau positif (ekuitas). PSAK 4 (1994) mengatur bahwa kepentingan nonpengendali disajikan di antara liabilitas dan ekuitas, sedangkan PSAK 4 (Revisi 2009) mengatur bahwa kepentingan nonpengendali disajikan sebagai ekuitas dalam laporan posisi keuangan konsolidasian. Sampel penelitian ini terdiri atas 137 emiten dari berbagai sektor industri yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) selama enam tahun observasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode regresi data panel. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sebelum PSAK 4 (Revisi 2009) berlaku efektif, investor menganggap kepentingan nonpengendali setara dengan liabilitas. Setelah PSAK 4 (Revisi 2009) berlaku efektif, perubahan pada penyajian kepentingan nonpengendali ke ekuitas tidak menyebabkan investor mempersepsikannya sebagai ekuitas. Hasil ini membuktikan bahwa perubahan pada penyajian suatu pos dalam laporan keuangan tidak serta merta mengubah persepsi investor terhadap pos tersebut.
PERSEPSI INVESTOR TERHADAP PERUBAHAN PENYAJIAN KEPENTINGAN NONPENGENDALI SEBELUM DAN SESUDAH BERLAKU EFEKTIFNYA PSAK 4 (REVISI 2009) Margaret, Margaret; Hidayat, Taufik
Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia Vol. 13, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to examine investors’ perception toward changes in noncontrolling interest presentation before and after the effective date of PSAK 4 (Revised 2009). The perception is determined from the value relevance of noncontrolling interest component, whether the value relevance is negative (liabilities) or positive (equity). PSAK 4 (1994) regulated that noncontrolling interests should be presented as mezzanine items, meanwhile PSAK 4 (Revised 2009) regulated that noncontrolling interests should be presented as equity in consolidated statement of financial position. Sample of this study consists of 137 listed companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from various industry sectors with six years observation. This study used regression method for panel data. The result shows that before the effective date of PSAK 4 (Revised 2009), investors perceived noncontrolling interests as equal to liabilities. After the effective date of PSAK 4 (Revised 2009), changes in noncontrolling interests presentation as equity do not change investors’ perception as equity. This result gives evidence that changes in presentation of an item in financial statement do not necessarily change investors’ perception toward a financial statement item.