Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Diya Al-Afkar Nun : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Tafsir di Nusantara Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith Fikrah: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan Jurnal Penelitian Agama Maghza: Jurnal Ilmu al-Qur'an and Tafsir
Munawir Munawir
IAIN Purwokerto
Religion Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Maghza: Jurnal Ilmu al-Qur'an and Tafsir

 1 
Problematika Seputar Kodifikasi Al-Qur'an Munawir Munawir
MAGHZA Vol 3 No 2 (2018): Juli - Desember 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin Adab dan Humaniora (FUAH), Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1129.093 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/maghza.v3i2.2128

Abstract

Historically, the bookkeeping of the Koran is not as complicated as the books of Hadith. But that does not mean that the codification process of the Qur'an is not interesting to learn. In this case, there are a number of questions that remain relevant to convey; Is the Qur'an still true today? What is the true structure of the Qur'an? Are there standard standards for Koran arrangements agreed upon by Muslims throughout the world? These questions about the codification of the Qur'an often arise, because in the course of the Qur'an, in its capacity as a book (a piece of paper) is bound where there are dictums in Arabic that Muslims consider to be revelations from God - the codification process is no longer normative, but very historical, because related to various types of discourses (social, political, etc.) that surround it. In this context, historical and analytic studies of the historical codification of the Qur'an need to be presented, and this paper was written to meet those needs. Through the study of history based on Muslim scholarship about the history of the Quranic codification from the time of the Prophet Saw. to standardization in the form of reading and writing, which was then supplemented with critical analysis based on Western scholarship, it found that standardization "writing" the Qur'an in rasm Uṡmānī cultural products, and therefore open and allow for tashih, criticism, or even revision with more valid data findings. This does not mean the desecration of the Qur'an, but as a logical consequence of the existence of rasm Uṡmānī as something which is a human form.
Arah Baru Pengembangan Ulumul Quran mustain yusuf; Munawir Munawir
MAGHZA Vol 4 No 2 (2019): Juli-Desember 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin Adab dan Humaniora (FUAH), Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (480.012 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/maghza.v4i2.3434

Abstract

Muhkam science and mutasyabbih are the results of human construction. Its existence is clearly not absolutely true. As a science, muhkam and mutasyabbih are always open to all developments. This research - using Thomas Kuhn's shifting paradigm framework - analyzes the direction of the development of muhkam-mutasyabbih science starting from normal science, anomaly/crisis, and new paradigm. From this analysis, the answer is obtained that the construction of muhkam-mutasyabbih (normal science) is based on the textuality of the verse. This construction experiences anomaly and even crisis when dealing with maqashidul Qur'an, because by relying solely on verse textuality, there is often a counterproductive product between interpretation based on muhkam science and mutasyabbih with the maqashidul Qur'an itself. Here a new paradigm is born, value-based muhkam-mutasyabbih; muhkam is fundamental and universal values ​​(ushul Al-Qur'an), while mutasyabbih are implementational values ​​that are local-temporal (furu 'Al-Qur'an).
Co-Authors Agus Sunaryo Ansori Ansori mustain yusuf