Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Informatika WAJAH HUKUM
Chandra Irawan
Unknown Affiliation
Computer Science & IT Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENERIMA BANTUAN BEDAH RUMAH MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALITYCAL HIERARCHY PROSESS (AHP) DAN MULTI OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION ON THE BASIS OF RATIO ANALYSIS M. Abu Jihad Plaza R; Chandra Irawan
Jurnal Informatika Vol 20, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Informatika
Publisher : IIB Darmajaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30873/ji.v20i2.2368

Abstract

Program bedah rumah adalah salah satu strategi pemerintah dalam membantu warga yang kurang mampu dan memiliki rumah layak huni. Dalam menentukan berhak dan tidaknya keluarga untuk mendapatkan bantuan bedah rumah memerlukan proses penyeleksian yang  berjalan sangat lambat dan dinilai kurang efisien dari segi waktu dan biaya serta dirasa kurang efektif. Pada penelitian ini menerapkan dua metode yaitu Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) untuk perhitungan bobot tiap kriteria dan Multi Objective Optimization on The Basis of Ratio Analysis MOORA digunakan untuk nilai perangkingan. Berdasarkan hasil penerapan metode AHP dan MOORA dalam sistem penunjang keputusan penerimaan bantuan bedah rumah dengan kriteria jumlah tanggungan, status rumah, kondisi rumah, status BSPS, penghasilan dan persiapan membangun rumah dengan status kelayakan lebih dari  atau sama dengan 0,25 Layak dan kurang dari 0,25 tidak layak. Kata Kunci : Sistem Penunjang Keputusan, AHP, MOORA
Kewenangan Jaksa dalam Melakukan Perampasan Aset Terdakwa Korupsi Chandra Irawan; M. Sirozi; Romli SA; Ulya Kencana
Wajah Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2023): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v7i2.954

Abstract

Research on the authority of prosecutors in confiscating assets of corruption defendants, because returning state assets to Corruption Eradication is difficult. In fact, corruption causes a lot of losses to the country. Even though criminal procedures have been made to save state assets, but it hasn't worked yet. Therefore, returning the assets of Corruption perpetrators can save state assets. The authority of the Prosecutor's Office plays a very important role in this effort. Research problems regarding the authority of prosecutors in confiscating assets of corruption defendants, the authority of the Prosecutor's Office to address the issue of returning state assets. Legal research method with a statutory approach. The result is that after the Corruption Eradication results there is a return of state assets, namely, there is a court decision. The legal basis for return is stated in Article 18 UU.31/1999 jo UU. 20/2001 Corruption Crimes, by summoning the convict, family and legal advisors by the Prosecutor regarding the stages, implementation of the return.
Co-Authors M. Sirozi Plaza R, M. Abu Jihad Romli SA Ulya Kencana