Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Language Education and Development (JLed) Journal of Language Education and Development (JLed)
Darmawan Budiyanto
081371521838
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
USING PPP (PRESENTATION, PRACTICE AND PRODUCTION) STRATEGY ON SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT Darmawan Budiyanto
Journal Of Language Education and Development (JLed) Vol 1 No 2 (2019): Vol 1 No 2 July (2019): Journal of Language Education and Development
Publisher : STKIP Muhammadiyah Muara Bungo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (589.404 KB)

Abstract

This study aimed to find out whether or not there was any significant differences in speaking achievement in Recount Text between students who were taught by using PPP (Presentation, Practice and Production) Strategy and those who were not. There were 66 students of eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Palembang that was involved in this study as the sample. They were divided into two groups, experimental group consisted of 33 students and control group consisted of 33 students. For the sample, the writer chose class of VIII 7 as control group and class of VIII 6 as experimental group. The method of this study was used quantitative method with quasi experimental design. The experimental group was taught by using PPP (Presentation, Practice and Production) Strategy meanwhile the control group were taught by using Discussion Strategy. The result showed that the mean score of experimental group increased from 68.182 in pretest to 81.515 in posttest. Furthermore, the result of independent t-test from experimental and control group shown that the t-obtained was 2.346 and it was higher than t-table 1.669. In conclusion, that there was a significant difference between students who were taught using PPP (Presentation, Practice and Production) strategy and students who were not.
SCRAMBLE SENTENCE METHOD TO TEACH WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT THE EIGHT GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 26 PALEMBANG Darmawan Budiyanto; Sophia Rahmawati
Journal Of Language Education and Development (JLed) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): Vol 2 No 1 November (2020): Journal of Language Education and Development
Publisher : STKIP Muhammadiyah Muara Bungo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (573.372 KB) | DOI: 10.52060/jled.v2i1.178

Abstract

The problem of this study is “Is there any significant difference on writing achievement between the eighth grade students of SMP N 26 Palembang who are taught by using scramble sentence method and those who are not?”. This research applied quantitative method namely quasi experimental design and used simple random sampling. The writer used writing rubric to collect data and analyzed the result of test by using paired sample t-test and independent simple t-test. Total number of population was 303 students which is VIII.3 as control group and VIII.I, as experimental group. Based on the result of this study, the mean score in post test score were 73.44 for control group and 76.09 for experimental group. The result of the independent sample t-test shows the value of sig. (2-tailed) was 0.01 < 0.05 at the level of significant 0.05. While, the value of t-obtained was 2.415 higher than the critical value of t-table was 1.665 with degree of freedom 62, can be concluded that the null hypothesis was rejected and the alternative hypothesis was accepted.
USING PPP (PRESENTATION, PRACTICE AND PRODUCTION) STRATEGY ON SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT Darmawan Budiyanto
Journal Of Language Education and Development (JLed) Vol 1 No 2 (2019): Vol 1 No 2 July (2019): Journal of Language Education and Development (JLed)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Muara Bungo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52060/jled.v1i2.133

Abstract

This study aimed to find out whether or not there was any significant differences in speaking achievement in Recount Text between students who were taught by using PPP (Presentation, Practice and Production) Strategy and those who were not. There were 66 students of eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Palembang that was involved in this study as the sample. They were divided into two groups, experimental group consisted of 33 students and control group consisted of 33 students. For the sample, the writer chose class of VIII 7 as control group and class of VIII 6 as experimental group. The method of this study was used quantitative method with quasi experimental design. The experimental group was taught by using PPP (Presentation, Practice and Production) Strategy meanwhile the control group were taught by using Discussion Strategy. The result showed that the mean score of experimental group increased from 68.182 in pretest to 81.515 in posttest. Furthermore, the result of independent t-test from experimental and control group shown that the t-obtained was 2.346 and it was higher than t-table 1.669. In conclusion, that there was a significant difference between students who were taught using PPP (Presentation, Practice and Production) strategy and students who were not.
SCRAMBLE SENTENCE METHOD TO TEACH WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT THE EIGHT GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 26 PALEMBANG Darmawan Budiyanto; Sophia Rahmawati
Journal Of Language Education and Development (JLed) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): Vol 2 No 1 November (2019): Journal of Language Education and Development (JLed)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Muara Bungo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52060/jled.v2i1.178

Abstract

The problem of this study is “Is there any significant difference on writing achievement between the eighth grade students of SMP N 26 Palembang who are taught by using scramble sentence method and those who are not?”. This research applied quantitative method namely quasi experimental design and used simple random sampling. The writer used writing rubric to collect data and analyzed the result of test by using paired sample t-test and independent simple t-test. Total number of population was 303 students which is VIII.3 as control group and VIII.I, as experimental group. Based on the result of this study, the mean score in post test score were 73.44 for control group and 76.09 for experimental group. The result of the independent sample t-test shows the value of sig. (2-tailed) was 0.01 < 0.05 at the level of significant 0.05. While, the value of t-obtained was 2.415 higher than the critical value of t-table was 1.665 with degree of freedom 62, can be concluded that the null hypothesis was rejected and the alternative hypothesis was accepted.
Co-Authors Sophia Rahmawati