Felicitas Sri Marniati
Jayabaya University

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Efektivitas Pengawasan Majelis Pengawas Daerah dalam Mengurangi Pelanggaran Notaris Terhadap Pelaksanaan Jabatannya Triana Handayani; Felicitas Sri Marniati; Andrea Septiyani
Jurnal Nuansa Kenotariatan Vol 4, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Postgraduate of Jayabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jnk.v4i2.179

Abstract

The purpose of the establishment of the Supervisory Board is to provide guidance and supervision to the Notary. Indication that showed Supervision is actualy on target or effective would be no more any violation committed by the Notary in carrying out his duties.From the examinations resulf carried out by the MPD of South Jakarta out of the empirical data showeds that there are still violations committed by Notaries in which such violation has the West Java High Court. The research method used is a normative juridicial method. The data source used is secondary data sources supported by primary data sources in the form of court decisions and interviews with Notaries, MPD and MPW. The analysis technique used here in descriptive analisys method. The results showed there’s some Notary who has commitetted violation of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter a of Act Number 2 Year 2014 concerning Amendments to UUJN, by careful enough in creating the Deed resulted in the giving out of written summon. In the case verdict of the West Java High Court Number: 87 / PDT / 2018 / PT.BDG dated March 27 2018, the Notary considered to have commits an unlawful act, so that the Deed is requested to be null and void by the aggrieved party, and the Panel of Judges ruled that the Deed is null and void. The violation by the Notary indicates that MPD supervision has not been effective. The effectiveness of supervision is influenced by legal factors, law enforcement, facilities, society, and culture. Empirical data shows that the society factors which become hurdle to the effectiveness of the Notary’s supervision, are inadequate understanding of the parties / parties to the UUJN and the prevailing regulations which contribute to the violations of the implementation of the Notary’s duties
Prohibition of Notary Promotion and Publication in terms of UUJN Yusticia wicaksono; Yuhelson Yuhelson; Felicitas Sri Marniati
Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol 1 No 3 (2023): Juli : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/jaksa.v1i3.1338

Abstract

The purpose is written to remind again that there is a prohibition on promotion and publication based on Law No. 30 of 2004. The method is carried out by the author based on normative juridical methods. The formulation of the research is how the review of UUJN concerns the Position of a Notary on the form of promotion and publication of identity as well as the authority of a notary. Primary data of law no. 30 of 2004 which has been amended to Law no. 2 of 201 4 . Random secondary data for examples of violation cases in the form of advertisements for notary services from various digital sources. Tertiary data comes from studies such as journals, final research studies, and books that have been published digitally. Data is processed by reduction stages, adjustment of primary, secondary, and tertiary data with author's interpretation, and deduction. The research findings are that there are 3 articles that the authors found, namely article 9 paragraph (1) letter d, article 12 letter c, and article 17 letter a. These three articles indicate that there is a prohibition against promotion and publication.