Irawati, Jovita
Faculty Of Law Universitas Pelita Harapan

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

INKONSISTENSI REGULASI DI BIDANG KESEHATAN DAN IMPLIKASI HUKUMNYA TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN PERKARA MEDIK DI INDONESIA Jovita Irawati
Law Review Volume XIX, No. 1 - July 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v19i1.1551

Abstract

AbstractAs an institution authorized to deal with legal complaints concerning improper health services, Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Honorary Assembly (MKDKI) has the task of determining whether there are malpractices made by doctors or dentists in the application of medical disciplines in terms of medical professional standards. This authority is stipulated in Article 66 (1) Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice. However, disharmony which occurs between such article and article 66 (3) as well as several health related law in Indonesia seems like negating MKDKI role in determining the element of negligence at the time of an alleged violation such as medical malpractice. Based on this condiion, the study was conducted to examine the impact of such legal disharmony in the practices and services of  Indonesian health sector. Keywords: Medical Law, Patient’s Right, Existence of MKDKI AbstrakSebagai lembaga yang memiliki kewenangan dalam menangani pengaduan atas pelayanan kesehatan, Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia (MKDKI) memiliki tugas untuk menentukan ada tidaknya kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh dokter atau dokter gigi dalam penerapan disiplin ilmu kedokteran dan kedokteran gigi yang tidak sesuai dengan standar profesi medik. Kewenangan ini tercantum dalam ketentuan Pasal 66 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran. Akan tetapi, disharmoni antara ketentuan Pasal 66 Ayat (1) dengan Ayat (3) dan beberapa regulasi yang terkait dengan bidang kesehatan seakan menegaskan peranan MKDKI dalam menentukan unsur kelalaian pada saat suatu dugaan pelanggaran seperti malpraktik medik. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengkaji tentang akibat hukum dari disharmoni peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang kesehatan itu serta dampaknya terhadap praktik kedokteran Indonesia. Melalui tulisan ini diharapkan dapat diperoleh kesimpulan dan saran-saran yang relevan yang dapat diterapkan untuk mewujukan pembangunan kesehatan yang berkualitas untuk masyarakat. Kata Kunci: Hukum Kesehatan, Hak Pasien, Eksistensi MKDKI
Strengthening the Law on the Construction of High-rise Building That is Beneficial to Support National Development Michael Sofian Tanuhendrata; Jovita Irawati; Henry Soelistyo Budi
Global Legal Review Vol 1, No 2 (2021): October
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/glr.v1i2.4111

Abstract

The number of high-rise buildings in the big cities of Indonesia is increasing along with land being more limited and its prices being very high. Most of these high-rise buildings are in Jakarta and some of them are facing the risk of building failure that may cause business and operation interruption.  These buildings that have been erected and operating need to receive regular maintenance and supervision to ensure the building's condition and safety. Many building owners and managers do not conduct and plan maintenance and supervision properly causing these buildings of being at risk of fire and building structure – mechanical failure / damage. For this reason, rigorous regulations, and its enforcement in building construction and maintenance are needed to ensure that these buildings operate reliably and encourage building owners and facility manager to comply with them properly. Cultivated Penalty and strict sanctions need to be renewed and must be implemented properly by Government bodies and local authority. Building Audit Institute can be formed to assist the central government and local governments (Governor) in carrying out their functions to ensure the safety and security of buildings, including their users. Strengthening existing laws and regulations will greatly assist in law enforcement and certainty for owners, building managers and building users, which in turn will support national development.
Prescription Drugs Price Setting and Generic Drugs Prescription concerning Consumer Protection Law in Indonesia Jenny Jatemin; Jovita Irawati
Global Legal Review Vol 1, No 2 (2021): October
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/glr.v1i2.4126

Abstract

Health is one of the most important human rights in human life. Access to affordable prescription drugs is still a problem for people with out-of-pocket expenses. Generic prescription drugs that are much cheaper than non-generic drugs are still low, especially in non-government healthcare facilities. This research aims to provide suggestions of regulation on price control of prescription drugs and generic prescription drugs that will assure certainty and affordability for the public. The methodology is doctrinal legal research and is supported by empirical studies. The research finding consist of two things, namely the price of prescription drugs and the prescription of generic drugs. The first finding is that Highest Retail Price (HET) set by the manufacturer is potentially to be unlimited because there is no limit control. Currently, there are many drugs sold over HET with minimal supervision from the Government. The absence of law is found as the existing regulations are only for those listed in the National Formulary, while the rest have not been regulated. Therefore, the suggestion is to set ceiling prices for prescription drugs with comparison among generic drugs, branded generic drugs, and the originator; also create a refund mechanism for prices above HET to assure the consumers’ rights to get compensation under the Consumer Protection Law. The second finding is that only a few doctors prescribe generic drugs. Additionally, patients have not been involved in the treatment decisions.Therefore, the suggestion is to associate "the action of prescribing generic drugs" with the extension of doctor's license, namelythe Registration Certificate (STR); so that doctors will prescribe generic drugs without the need for close supervision due to their interests. With the increase of generic drugs’ prescription, the financing of health services, nationwide as well asindividually, can become more affordable.