Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Verstek
Nur Rohadi
Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Pembuktian Dan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Putusan Yang Menyatakan Bebas Dari Segala Dakwaan Dalam Perkara Korupsi Nur Rohadi
Verstek Vol 5, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (269.613 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v5i1.33446

Abstract

This research aims to: 1) analyzes the process of proof in the criminal offence of corruption is already in compliance with the principles of the Law The Crime Of Corruption and the KUHAP. 2) analyzes the basic consideration of judges in meting out the verdict declaring the accused free of all claims in the case already in accordance with article 183 jo Article 191 paragraph (1) of the KUHAP. Based on the results of research and discussion, researchers conclude that: the process of proof in the criminal acts of corruption in the ruling of the No.78/Pid. Sus/2011/PN-Tipikor-Smg is based on the instruments of evidence submitted in the trial courts. The implications of information experts on corruption trial loan BPR Djoko Tingkir Sragen significantly to prove the charges by the public prosecutor, as evidenced by the description used by experts who break the juridical construction the public prosecutor so that the prosecution had not met primair and prosecuted with charges of subsidair. Keywords: Proving The Crime of Corruption, Non Ruling
Co-Authors