Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi
Jannatin Ardhuha
Pendidikan Fisika, Universitas Mataram
Education Physics Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Kreativitas Peserta Didik dengan Pendekatan Berpikir Kausalitik Berscaffolding Faisal Faisal; Joni Rokhmat; Jannatin Ardhuha
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi (JPFT) Vol 6 No 1 (2020): Januari-Juni
Publisher : Department of Physics Education, Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (271.874 KB) | DOI: 10.29303/jpft.v6i1.1771

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate problem-solving ability (PSA) and creativity of students through physics learning with causalitic-thinking approach with scaffolding of type 2b. With the scaffolding, in learning, students have to determine all causes and predict all possible effects in a phenomenon, also give arguments how conditions of each cause so that each effect occur. However, the number of the causes and effects is informed and part of the causes, effects, and arguments also be given so the students only need to complete them. This research used method of experiment with control group design. As population were students of class XI MIA SMAN 3 Mataram year 2017/2018 while as sample were the students of class XI MIA 8 and XI MIA 9. Data of the PSA and creativity were taken by using one set of test instrument and respectively analyzed with t-test and U-test at significance level of 5%. The former test showed that tcounted is 12.621 with ttable of 2.004 which meant that the approach affected PSA of students. While, the latter one showed that zcounted is 6.69 with ztable of 1.96 which meant that the approach also affected creativity of students.
PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRY STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISON (InSTAD) TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA DITINJAU DARI SELF CONFIDENCE PESERTA DIDIK Tri Aisya Ade Kantari; Wahyudi; Kosim; Jannatin Ardhuha
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): Volume 08 No 02, September 2023
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v8i2.10064

Abstract

The Inquiry Student Team Achievement Division (InSTAD) learning model on physics learning outcomes in terms of students' self-confidence . This type of research is quasi-experimental with a research design that is factorial design. The population of this study were all students of class XI IPA at SMAN 2 Gerung with the sampling technique using saturated sampling technique . Based on the research results, it was obtained that the average value of students' physics learning outcomes in the experimental class was 77.38 and the average value of learning outcomes in the control class was 72.22. The results of the study also obtained the average value of the self-confidence of students who were qualified into two categories, namely high self-confidence and low self-confidence. Based on the research results obtained in the experimental class there were 12 students with high self-confidence with an average of 68.92, and 9 students with low self-confidence with an average of 55.11. Whereas in the control class there were 7 students with high self-confidence with an average of 64.71, and 11 students with low self-confidence with an average of 56. The learning outcomes data were normally distributed and homogeneous. InSTAD learning model data, self confidence, and learning outcomes analyzed using the two-way ANOVA test at a significant level of 5% so that t count on the effect of the InSTAD learning model with learning outcomes of 67.09, t count on the effect of self-confidence on learning outcomes of 1.46, and t count on the interaction between models learning with self-confidence on learning outcomes of 3.44 with a t table value for the three treatments of 4.12. so based on these data it can be concluded that H 01 was rejected, H 02 was accepted, and H 03 was accepted.
Co-Authors Faisal Faisal Joni Rokhmat Kosim Tri Aisya Ade Kantari Wahyudi