Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ULUL ALBAB LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra
Mudjia Rahardjo
Fakultas Humaniora dan Budaya, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Malang. Jalan Gajayana No. 50 Telepon (0341) 551354, Faksimile (0341) 572533 Malang 65144
Religion Arts Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
BAHASA SEBAGAI ALAT KOMUNIKASI PUBLIK DAN PEMBANGUNAN WACANA Rahardjo, Mudjia
LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 2, No 1 (2007): LiNGUA
Publisher : Laboratorium Informasi & Publikasi Fakultas Humaniora UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/ling.v2i1.558

Abstract

Language is the most important tool we have for effective human communication, and the efficacy of communication is therefore directly related to the quality of this oral communication medium. The effectiveness of communication depends on several factors, the most important of which are the contents of the communication, the parties involved in the communication and the setting in which the communication takes place.  Bad communication can lead to a complete breakdown in relationship and cause misunderstandings which quite often lead to conflicts between elements in the social structure. Effective communication has a very important role in creating an environment for reasoned debat, discussion and understanding in global society, and in this regard the current American approach to creating conducive to reasoned debate on the issue of global terrorisme is hypothesized to be in the less-than-effective category.
POLITIK BAHASA DAN BAHASA POLITIK (Bahasa dalam Praksis Politik di Indonesia) Rahardjo, Mudjia
ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam Vol 5, No 1 (2004): Islamic Studies
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (556.723 KB) | DOI: 10.18860/ua.v5i1.6147

Abstract

At a glance, there is no relation between language and politics. In Jae:, both and politics have mutual and equal relationship. Language is not only a means of political communication, but also a medium of political practice. As a symbolic reality, language can be used as a means to understand pm1·er dynamics and hove power works. Realizing the important role of language in political practice, every regime uses it as a significant instrument to carry out power consolidation by creating certain political idioms. Therefore, controlling public awareness and social collective memory through a symbolic reality always becomes a part of agenda of the authority to maintain their power. It is, therefore, ei·ery change of regime is always followed by the changes of new terms based on the ideology to struggle.
Bahasa: Antara Pikiran dan Tindakan Rahardjo, Mudjia
ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam Vol 3, No 2 (2001): Islamic Studies
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (535.344 KB) | DOI: 10.18860/ua.v3i2.6106

Abstract

Language, idea and action are closely related. It starts from cultivating an idea expressed in a language which creates an action. In certain extent, however, language does not perfectly picture what we think, feel and understand As a result, what we express in language is not necessarily the same as what we expect. This might create misunderstandings. From this point of view, language doesn't merely consist of words constructed in certain patterns suitable with certain grammatical rules, but language should also deliver the intended message.
REASON, EXPERIENCE, AND LANGUAGE TO ACQUIRE KNOWLEDGE (IN WESTERN AND ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVES) Rahardjo, Mudjia
LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra Vol 16, No 1 (2021): LiNGUA
Publisher : Laboratorium Informasi & Publikasi Fakultas Humaniora UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/ling.v16i1.12629

Abstract

The system of knowledge acquisition is one of the most important topics in philosophical debates since ancient Greek. According to the Western philosophical worldview, as the universally accepted method, there are two schools of thought to acquire proper knowledge; rationalism and empiricism. Rationalism assumes that sound reason is the main human potential to acquire knowledge that constitutes a priori knowledge, while empiricism relies on sensory abilities constituting a posteriori or empirical knowledge. In addition, Islam offers intuition or instinct as another source of knowledge that creates intuitive knowledge, be it empirical or spiritual. The knowledge gained is then developed through language symbols, from being personal to finally public knowledge. Through language, knowledge is inherited from one generation to the next. However, due to its limitations, language is not able to symbolize all types of knowledge. Consequently, there are two kinds of knowledge; articulated (explicit) knowledge and unarticulated (tacit) knowledge. Nevertheless, despite their sharp differences, both the Western and Islamic worldviews assume that knowledge acquisition is the field of a speculative philosophical endeavor which is hard to get a satisfying answer, though it is not impossible.
Co-Authors