Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal GANEC SWARA
ASMAYANDI ASMAYANDI
Fakultas Hukum Universitas 45 Mataram
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Education Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS TERHADAP PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM KEWENANGAN DISKRESI OLEH PEMERINTAH YANG BERKAITAN DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN ASMAYANDI ASMAYANDI
GANEC SWARA Vol 15, No 2 (2021): September 2021
Publisher : Universitas Mahasaraswati K. Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35327/gara.v15i2.215

Abstract

Philosophically, Discretion has a very important position in terms of government administration by public officials, for this reason its juridical-formal arrangement is contained in Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. The formulation of the problem in this study is focused on two things, first, how is the formulation of the concept of discretion in Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration? and second, how is the implementation of discretionary authority legal accountability by the government in relation to the criminal act of corruption? From the research results it can be concluded that, firstly, the formulation of the concept of discretion in Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration is regulated in Article 22, which provides limits on discretion in two ways, firstly discretion must be issued by an authorized official, and secondly discretion must have clear objectives. And the second form of legal responsibility for discretionary acts related to corruption is in the form of administrative sanctions as regulated in Article 80 of Law No. 30 of 2014.
KEDUDUKAN MAJELIS KRAMA DESA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA BERDASARKAN PERATURAN BUPATI LOMBOK UTARA NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG PEDOMAN MAJELIS KRAMA DESA (STUDI KASUS DI DESA GONDANG, KECAMATAN GANGGA, KABUPATEN LOMBOK UTARA) ASMAYANDI ASMAYANDI; TITIN APRIANI; SYAIFULLAH SYAIFULLAH
GANEC SWARA Vol 17, No 2 (2023): Juni 2023
Publisher : Universitas Mahasaraswati K. Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35327/gara.v17i2.475

Abstract

The MKD institution was formed based on Regent Regulation Number 20 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Village Krama Council. In Article 1 numbers 9 and 10 it is explained that: Village Community Institutions are institutions formed by the community according to needs and are partners of the village government in empowering village communities. The Krama Desa Council, hereinafter abbreviated as MKD, is a Village Community Institution in charge of dispute resolution in the Village. The formulation of the problem in this research is first, What is the Position of the Village Krama Council in Resolving Disputes Based on Regent Regulation Number 20 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for the Village Krama Assembly? And Second, how effective is the existence of the Village Krama Council in resolving disputes based on Regent Regulation Number 20 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for the Village Krama Council (Case Study in Gondang Village, Gangga District, North Lombok Regency)? The results of the research conducted by the author show that first, the Village Krama Council (MKD) was formed based on North Lombok Regent Regulation Number 20 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for the Village Krama Assembly (MKD) as a village government partner institution in resolving disputes that occur in village communities. The existence of the MKD institution in Gondang village was considered very effective because during the time the MKD was formed it had resolved various cases, ranging from civil, customary, and minor criminal cases, of which approximately 13 cases were recorded. However, in carrying out its functions, the MKD still has problems both internally and externally.
PENERAPAN MEKANISME MEDIASI DALAM PROSES PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEWENANGAN BADAN PERMUSYARAWATAN DESA DAN KEPALA DESA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG DESA (STUDI KASUS DI DESA JENGGALA, KECAMATAN TANJUNG KABUPATEN LOMBOK UTARA) ASMAYANDI ASMAYANDI; SYAIFULLAH SYAIFULLAH; TITIN APRIANI
GANEC SWARA Vol 17, No 4 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : Universitas Mahasaraswati K. Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35327/gara.v17i4.679

Abstract

That the potential for overlap in the authority of the BPD and the Head as a form of normative application of Law Number 6 of 2014 is very large, especially if we look at aspects of implementing the functions of the BPD Institution which will coincide with the function of the village head as executor of government in the village. The formulation of the problem in this research is first, How is the Mediation Mechanism Implemented in the Dispute Resolution Process over the Authority of the Village Consultative Body and the Village Head Based on Law Number 6 of 2014 on Village Neighborhoods? And secondly, what are the alternative forms of mediation that can be implemented in the Dispute Resolution Process over the Authority of the Village Consultative Body and the Village Head Based on Law Number 6 of 2014 on Village Neighbors (Case Study in Jenggala Village, Tanjung District, North Lombok Regency) The results of the research conducted by the author show that firstly, the application of a mediation mechanism in resolving authority disputes between the BPD and the Village Head can be carried out on a normative basis contained in the provisions of Article 112 in Article 115 of Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages. Second, alternative forms of mediation in resolving disputes between the Village Head and BPD in Jenggala Village can be implemented in 2 (two) forms, namely, formal mediation and informal mediation. Formal mediation is mediation carried out by the KLU DP2KBPMD Service who acts as the mediator. Meanwhile, informal mediation can be carried out through, firstly, the Village Inter-Institutional Communication Forum (FKAKD), the formation of which was initiated by the BPD based on the provisions of Article 62 of North Lombok Regency Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2019 concerning BPD, and secondly through the Village Krama Council based on North Lombok Regent Regulation Number 20 2017 concerning MKD Guidelines.
EFEKTIVITAS PELAKSANAAN FUNGSI LEGISLASI DPRD KABUPATEN LOMBOK UTARA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG MPR, DPR, DPD DAN DPRD (STUDI KASUS DI KABUPATEN LOMBOK UTARA) ASMAYANDI ASMAYANDI; TITIN APRIANI; NI LUH ARININGSIH SARI; SYAIFULLAH SYAIFULLAH
GANEC SWARA Vol 18, No 2 (2024): Juni 2024
Publisher : Universitas Mahasaraswati K. Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35327/gara.v18i2.855

Abstract

The characteristic that shows a country adheres to democracy is the division of power in administering the state. The Trias Politica presented by Montesquieu consists of the executive function, legislative function and also the judicial function. Then these three functions were institutionalized into three state organs, namely the government as the executive, the judiciary as the judiciary and the parliament as the legislature. The formulation of the problem in this research is: first, how to implement the legislative function of the North Lombok Regency Regional People's Representative Council based on Law no. 17 of 2014 concerning the MPR, DPR, DPRD and DPD?, and secondly, what are the factors that influence the implementation of the legislative function of the North Lombok Regency People's Representative Council? The ineffectiveness of the North Lombok Regency DPRD's legislative function can be assessed from the lack of regional regulations produced by the DPRD Institution itself, because, of the several regional regulations that were formed based on the data above, most of the regional regulations are of a regular nature, namely regulations that are an initiative of the Government. Area. Judging from the regional regulations that have been approved, there are three, namely 1 (one) in 2022 and 2 (two) in 2023. The three regional regulations contained are proposals from the executive or regional government. There are two influencing factors, including: Internal factors, namely, members are less proactive in carrying out the legislative functions of the DPRD, and that the capacity or availability of human resources from the 30 North Lombok Regency DPRD members is still minimal. Meanwhile, external factors, namely, regarding budget support, and social factors in carrying out their function as regional regulation makers, until now cannot be separated from their interaction with the community which has its own characteristics
Co-Authors ARININGSIH SARI, NI LUH SYAIFULLAH SYAIFULLAH TITIN APRIANI