Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal KOMUNITAS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN SOCIETY AND CULTURE
Puji Riyanti
A Muhammadiyah Binangun, Banjarnegara, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
RELASI SOSIAL PEDAGANG ETNIS CINA DAN ETNIS JAWA DI PASAR TRADISIONAL Riyanti, Puji
Jurnal Komunitas Vol 5, No 1 (2013): Tema Edisi: Multikulturalisme dan Interaksi Sosial
Publisher : Jurnal Komunitas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menjelaskan relasi sosial pedagang etnis Cina dan etnis Jawa di pasar tradisional. Penelitian dilakukan di Pasar Tradisional Klampok Purwaja. Relasi sosial antara pedagang etnis Cina dan pedagang etnis Jawa di pasar Purwareja Klampok tercermin dalam beberapa aktivitas yang dilakukan yaitu “relasi sosial di pasar” dan “diluar pasar”. Relasi diluar pasar masih terlihat adanya jarak sosial yang lebih banyak dipengaruhi oleh etnisitas, tetapi relasi dalam pasar tampak lebih egalitarian. Pelayanan kepada para pelanggan tidak memperdulikan adanya perbedaan etnis. Secara umum, mereka dapat hidup berdampingan dengan baik, keduanya saling diuntungkan secara ekonomis. Namun stereotype etnis diantara keduanya masih tetap ada dan berkembang dalam masyarakat yang cukup mempengaruhi hubungan sosial kedua etnis dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. The objective of this study is to describe the social relations between ethnic Chinese merchants and the Java community in traditional markets. The research was conducted in Klampok market, Purwareja. Social relations between ethnic Chinese merchants and traders in the market of ethnic Javanese Purwareja Klampok reflected in two forms: ”relations inside the market” and ”relations outside the market”. Relations outside the market is characterized with stereotypes, shaped by ethnicity. In contrast, relations inside the market is more egalitarian. Service to the customer is not influenced by ethnicity difference. In general, these two groups can coexist, and economically they are mutually advantaged. However, ethnic stereotypes still exist and thrive in a society and affect both ethnic social relations in everyday life.
RELASI SOSIAL PEDAGANG ETNIS CINA DAN ETNIS JAWA DI PASAR TRADISIONAL Riyanti, Puji
KOMUNITAS: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture Vol 5, No 1 (2013): Tema Edisi: Multikulturalisme dan Interaksi Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v5i1.2373

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menjelaskan relasi sosial pedagang etnis Cina dan etnis Jawa di pasar tradisional. Penelitian dilakukan di Pasar Tradisional Klampok Purwaja. Relasi sosial antara pedagang etnis Cina dan pedagang etnis Jawa di pasar Purwareja Klampok tercermin dalam beberapa aktivitas yang dilakukan yaitu “relasi sosial di pasar” dan “diluar pasar”. Relasi diluar pasar masih terlihat adanya jarak sosial yang lebih banyak dipengaruhi oleh etnisitas, tetapi relasi dalam pasar tampak lebih egalitarian. Pelayanan kepada para pelanggan tidak memperdulikan adanya perbedaan etnis. Secara umum, mereka dapat hidup berdampingan dengan baik, keduanya saling diuntungkan secara ekonomis. Namun stereotype etnis diantara keduanya masih tetap ada dan berkembang dalam masyarakat yang cukup mempengaruhi hubungan sosial kedua etnis dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. The objective of this study is to describe the social relations between ethnic Chinese merchants and the Java community in traditional markets. The research was conducted in Klampok market, Purwareja. Social relations between ethnic Chinese merchants and traders in the market of ethnic Javanese Purwareja Klampok reflected in two forms: ”relations inside the market” and ”relations outside the market”. Relations outside the market is characterized with stereotypes, shaped by ethnicity. In contrast, relations inside the market is more egalitarian. Service to the customer is not influenced by ethnicity difference. In general, these two groups can coexist, and economically they are mutually advantaged. However, ethnic stereotypes still exist and thrive in a society and affect both ethnic social relations in everyday life.
RELASI SOSIAL PEDAGANG ETNIS CINA DAN ETNIS JAWA DI PASAR TRADISIONAL Riyanti, Puji
Komunitas Vol 5, No 1 (2013): March 2013
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v5i1.2373

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menjelaskan relasi sosial pedagang etnis Cina dan etnis Jawa di pasar tradisional. Penelitian dilakukan di Pasar Tradisional Klampok Purwaja. Relasi sosial antara pedagang etnis Cina dan pedagang etnis Jawa di pasar Purwareja Klampok tercermin dalam beberapa aktivitas yang dilakukan yaitu “relasi sosial di pasar” dan “diluar pasar”. Relasi diluar pasar masih terlihat adanya jarak sosial yang lebih banyak dipengaruhi oleh etnisitas, tetapi relasi dalam pasar tampak lebih egalitarian. Pelayanan kepada para pelanggan tidak memperdulikan adanya perbedaan etnis. Secara umum, mereka dapat hidup berdampingan dengan baik, keduanya saling diuntungkan secara ekonomis. Namun stereotype etnis diantara keduanya masih tetap ada dan berkembang dalam masyarakat yang cukup mempengaruhi hubungan sosial kedua etnis dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. The objective of this study is to describe the social relations between ethnic Chinese merchants and the Java community in traditional markets. The research was conducted in Klampok market, Purwareja. Social relations between ethnic Chinese merchants and traders in the market of ethnic Javanese Purwareja Klampok reflected in two forms: ”relations inside the market” and ”relations outside the market”. Relations outside the market is characterized with stereotypes, shaped by ethnicity. In contrast, relations inside the market is more egalitarian. Service to the customer is not influenced by ethnicity difference. In general, these two groups can coexist, and economically they are mutually advantaged. However, ethnic stereotypes still exist and thrive in a society and affect both ethnic social relations in everyday life.
Co-Authors