Endang Susilaningsih
Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Soal Tes Pilihan Ganda Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skill menggunakan Aplikasi Anates Windows Versi 4.0.9 For Windows Ledi Merlin Purwati; Rizky Arianty; Diah Malaka Syakilah; Saiful Ridlo; Endang Susilaningsih
Jurnal Pendidikan UNIGA Vol 15, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Pendidikan UNIGA
Publisher : Fakultas Pendidikan Islam dan Keguruan Universitas Garut

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52434/jp.v15i2.1287

Abstract

Indonesia dalam penilaian PISA termasuk dalam kategori rendah dalam kemampuan literasi. Hal ini diperlukannya berbagai upaya termasuk dalam evaluasi pembelajaran dengan menyediakan soal HOTS. Soal yang ideal akan melatih siswa untuk dapat berfikir kritis dalam pemecahan masalah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis soal tes pilihan ganda berbasis HOTS menggunakan aplikasi Anates 4.0.9 for windows. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode deskriptif. Instrumen yang dibuat dalam penelitian ini ialah kisi-kisi soal dan butir soal HOTS. Penelitian ini melibatkan siswa kelas IV SDN 3 Kerandon Kabupaten Cirebon sejumlah 30 siswa. Hasil analisis menunjukkan mayoritas tingkat kesukaran soal kategori mudah, mayoritas daya pembeda soal kategori baik, efektivitas pengecoh kategori sangat baik, validitas soal sejumlah 16 dan soal yang diujikan bersifat reliabel. Hasil yang diperoleh kemudian dirangkum menjadi satu dalam rekap analisis butir soal.
An Analysis of Prospective Science Teacher Students’ Misconceptions on Photosynthesis and Plant Respiration Mazroatun Nikmah; Endang Susilaningsih; Budi Astuti
Journal of Innovative Science Education Vol 11 No 3 (2022): December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jise.v10i1.55150

Abstract

Misunderstanding in drawing conclusions about a concept caused by errors and incomplete thinking is called misconception. The existing misconception can lead to ongoing misconception if it is not immediately corrected. This study aimed to analyze how the level of misconceptions that occured in prospective science teachers. This study was conducted using a mixed-method with an explanatory sequential design. Methods of collecting data were Three Tier Multiple Choice (TTMC) test questions to analyze the misconception and in-depth interview to determine the factors causing misconceptions. The instrument used in this study was TTMC diagnostic test. Technique used for analyzing misconceptions data were descriptive percentages and for analyzing factors causing misconceptions data were in-depth interview. The results show that 60.4% of prospective science teacher students had misconceptions, which means that the misconceptions that occured were in the high category. Factors causing misconceptions were dominated by incompleteness in understanding the material, the influence of previous learning, the references used contain the wrong concept, low interest in deepening the material to find out the correct concept. This study is expected to help teachers and prospective teachers to decide what learning methods can be used to prevent misconceptions. Remediation can be done to find out where the misconceptions occur so that it can be corrected more quickly.