Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman

PERTUNJUKAN IMAM SHOLAT DAN TAFSIR POLITIK JAMAAH Rohim, Syaiful
ANALISIS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 1, No 1 (2014): Juni 2014
Publisher : INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI RADEN INTAN LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstrakMenjadi seorang pemuka agama sama halnya dengan menjadi seorang pemimpin masyarakat. Selain ia harus menjalankan ajaran agama secara personal ia juga mendapatkan tugas tambahan untuk menjalankan fungsi-fungsi kepemimpinan ritual keagamaan sesuai dengan kapasitas sosial yang ia miliki dalam kelompok sosialnya; Di dalam ruang sosial, praktik-praktik ritual sebetulnya tidak berbeda dengan perilaku sosial lainnya terutama dalam proses interaksi dan memberikan makna-makna subjektif dari simbol yang dipersepsinya. Ketika seseorang sedang berinteraksi, perilaku yang ia perankan dalam pelaksanaan ritual keagamaan, misalnya menjadi seorang imam dalam sholat, sejatinya tetap dalam frame “ketertiban interaksi” untuk memenuhi “keutuhan diri”. Artikel ini mengulas tentang makna simbolik kepemimpinan politik dalam praktik shalat. Dengan menggunakan paradigma interpretatif dari Lindlof dalam tradisi penelitian fenomenologis, penulis membuat tipologi kepemimpinan imam shalat berdasarkan fenomena simbol dan perilaku yang ditampakkan, yaitu: imam “kompromis-kondisional”, imam “Citra-Sensasional”, Imam Mandiri, dan Imam Ideal-Literalis.Kata Kunci: Imam Shalat; Politik; Kepemimpinan AbstractPRAYER LEADER AND THE INTERPRETATION OF POLITICAL CONGREGATION. Being a religious leader is not dissimilar to being a social leader. Besides he has to perform religius duties personally, he also received an additional task to carry out the functions of religious leadership in accordance with the social capacity he has in his social group. In the social space, ritual practices are actually not dissimilar to other social behavior, especially in the process of interaction and subjective meanings of symbols. When a person is interacting, the behavior that he played in performing religious rituals- for example became a prayer leader - actually remains in the frame of “interaction order” to meet the “self-perfection”. This article reviewed the symbolic meaning of leadership in the practice of prayer. By using interpretative paradigm of Lindlof in the phenomenological research tradition, the authors classify the prayer leadership typology based on specific symbols and behavior, namely: “conditional compromise leader”, “Image-Sensational leader”, “autonomus leader”, and “Ideal-literalists leader”.Keyword: Prayers leader; Politic; Leadership
PERTUNJUKAN IMAM SHOLAT DAN TAFSIR POLITIK JAMAAH Rohim, Syaiful
Analisis : Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 14, No 1 (2014): Analisis : Jurnal Studi Keislaman
Publisher : IAIN Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (270.02 KB)

Abstract

PRAYER LEADER AND THE INTERPRETATION OF POLITICAL CONGREGATION.  Being a religious leader is not dissimilar  to  being  a social  leader.  Besides  he has to  perform religius duties personally,   he also received an additional  task to carry out the functions of religious leadership in accordance with the social capacity he has in his social group.  In the social space, ritual practices are actually not dissimilar to other social behavior, especially in the process of interaction and subjective meanings of symbols. When a person is interacting, the behavior that he played in performing religious rituals- for example became a prayer leader - actually  remains  in the frame   of “interaction  order” to meet the “self-perfection”. This article reviewed the symbolic meaning of leadership  in the  practice  of prayer.  By using interpretative paradigm of Lindlof  in the phenomenological research tradition, the  authors    classify   the  prayer  leadership  typology  based on specific symbols and behavior, namely: “conditional  compromise leader”, “Image-Sensational leader”, “autonomus leader”, and “Ideal-literalists leader”.