Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Anterior Jurnal Jurnal Pendidikan
Walter Punding
Universitas Palangkaraya
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Determinasi Hasil Belajar Matematika ditinjau dari Fasilitas dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Muhammadiyah Palangka Raya Sugiharto Sugiharto; Karlinah Salamanya; Walter Punding; Yupito Yupito
Anterior Jurnal Vol 21 No 1 (2021): Anterior Jurnal
Publisher : ​Institute for Research and Community Services Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33084/anterior.v21i1.2899

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Diterminasi Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Muhammadiyah Palangka Raya ditinjau dari Fasilitas dan Motivasi Belajar. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa Kelas VIII SMP Muhammadiyah Palangka Raya tahun ajaran 2021/2022 sebanyak 161 siswa. Sampel diambil sebanyak 119 siswa. Data fasilitas dan motivasi belajar siswa diambil dengan angket, sedangkan data hasil belajar matematika siswa digunakan tes. Pengumpulan data dilakukan secara online, dengan media Google Form. Untuk menguji validitas angket digunakan rumus korelasi Product Moment. Untuk menguji validitas tes, digunakan Indeks Kesukaran (IK) dan Daya Pembeda (D). Untuk memperoleh reliabilitas angket, digunakan rumus Alpha, untuk reliabilitas tes digunakan rumus KR-20. Data dianalisis dengan korelasi Product Moment, Korelasi Ganda, serta rumus Koefisien Determinasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Ada hubungan positif yang signifikan fasilitas dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa, dengan nilai rhitung sebesar 0,33. Ada hubungan positif yang signifikan motivasi belajar dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa, dengan nilai rhitung sebesar 0,43. Ada hubungan positif yang signifikan fasilitas dan motivasi belajar dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa, dengan nilai R sebesar 0,43. Sedangkan rtabel = 0,18, Koefisien determinasi sebesar 0,18.
KAJIAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DI KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 6 PALANGKA RAYA Dina Damiyanti Hidayat; Walter Punding; Sugiharto .
JURNAL PENDIDIKAN Vol 23 No 1 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) Universitas Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52850/jpn.v23i1.4878

Abstract

This research is motivated by the low problem solving ability of students in solving straight line equations. The purpose of this study was to describe the mathematical problem solving ability of students on the material of straight line equations in class VIII-9 SMP Negeri 6 Palangka Raya. The subjects of this study were students of class VIII-9 of SMP Negeri 6 Palangka Raya out of 33 students only 26 students took the test. Then from 26 students 3 students were taken with high, medium, and high abilities, low to be interviewed. Based on the results of data analysis of students mathematicaproblemsolving abilities in solving straight line equations from 26 students, it was obtained that 2 students had problem solving abilities that were included in the "high" category, 3 students were included in the "medium" category, and 21 students fall into the "low" category. The results obtained in this study are: 1) students' mathematical problem solving abilities are high category, the problem can be understood and the settlement plan can be prepared properly, can carry out the settlement plan properly, and review the answers; 2) students mathematical problem solving abilities are in the medium category, the problem can be understood well, the settlement plan can be prepared well but it is not appropriate to carry out the completion plan and can review the answers; 3) students mathematical problem solving ability is low category, the problem can be understood, has not been able to make a settlement plan, and cannot carry out the settlement plan, and does not look back at the answer.  
Co-Authors Dina Damiyanti Hidayat Karlinah Salamanya Sugiharto Sugiharto Yupito Yupito