Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : SELODANG MAYANG

SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING DALAM PERANAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI SEBAGAI FUNGSI KONTROL PENGAWASAN PEMBANGUNAN PADA PROGRAM DMIJ Muh Rasyid Ridha
Selodang Mayang: Jurnal Ilmiah Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir Vol 4 No 1 (2018): Volume 4, Nomor 1, April 2018
Publisher : Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47521/selodangmayang.v4i1.89

Abstract

The village of Nusantara Jaya is a village located in Keritang district of Indragiri Hilir district, a village with eleven villages that are fairly large villages that require quite complex controls. With the program of DMIJ (Desa Maju Inhil Jaya) which is the flagship program of Indragiri downstream government to help the villages to be more advanced and rapidly development it is necessary a decision support system to determine the development fund of Nusantara Jaya village. In the process of developing the decision support system of determining the village development fund using Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method, this method is chosen because it’s able to select the best alternative from a number of alternative locations (hamlet) which will be prioritized as the recipient of the development fund based on the criteria specified. Research is done by finding the weight value for each attribute, then done the ranking process and determine the alternative (optimal) is the best location. Based on the analysis, it can be seen that the recommended locations as beneficiaries are ranked according to the highest as follows: (1) Teluk Dalam 0,95, (2) Gemilang Utama 0,84, (3) Nurul Iman 0,84, (4) Selamat Abadi 0,83, (5) Pinang Teluk 0,82, (6) Nusantara 10,8, (7) Sungai Bulan 0,77, (8) P.4.S Riau 0,76, (9) Amanah 0,70, (10) Makmur 0,68, and (11) Usaha Damai 0,55.
ANALISIS PENGGUNAAN DANA PROGRAM DESA MAJU INHIL JAYA (DMIJ) DENGAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS Muh. Rasyid Ridha
Selodang Mayang: Jurnal Ilmiah Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir Vol 5 No 3 (2019): Selodang Mayang Volume 5, Nomor 3, Desember 2019
Publisher : Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47521/selodangmayang.v5i3.136

Abstract

The ability to make fast and careful decisions will be the key to success in global competition and to make a decision certainly requires a careful analysis and calculation, depending on the many criteria that affect the problems that require a decision. Taking a decision with many criteria requires a special way of handling. For this reason, a model is needed before a decision is made. The DMIJ Systematics Program is a District Government Program through the Empowerment approach by streamlining the functions of the Village Government, Village Institutions and Village Communities to plan, implement, preserve and supervise development in a participatory manner. To help in solving these problems there needs to be a decision support system. Decision support system is an interactive system that supports decisions in the decision making process through alternatives obtained from the results of data processing, information and model design. AHP is a decision support tool that can be used to solve complex decisions. The application of the AHP method in the development of decision support systems for the use of DMIJ regional government program funds is determined by 4 criteria: infrastructure, welfare, health, and education. The final result of this research is the type of activity that becomes the main priority to be used as a priority for the use of the budget in the DMIJ regional government program is the Supporting Road. Priorities obtained by the Supporting Road (JPN) with a total value of 0.404 or 40.4%. The most influential indicators were Infrastructure at 56.3%, then Kesra at 25.1%, Health 6.1% and, Education at 12.5%. Keywords : Use of Funds, DMIJ, SPK, AHP