Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
2.359
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Lentera Hukum Al-'Adalah Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Sosio Konsepsia Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum JURNAL MAHKAMAH Raheema At-Turats Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Islam Dialogia: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial Al-Maslahah Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Journal of Research and Thought on Islamic Education (JRTIE) Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam Berasan: Journal of Islamic Civil Law
Muhammad Lutfi Hakim
IAIN Pontianak
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Islam

 1 
HERMENEUTIK-NEGOSIASI DALAM STUDI FATWA-FATWA KEAGAMAAN: ANALISIS KRITIK TERHADAP PEMIKIRAN KHALED M. ABOU EL FADL Muhammad Lutfi Hakim
istinbath Vol 19 No 1 (2020): Juni
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (861.006 KB) | DOI: 10.20414/ijhi.v19i1.204

Abstract

This paper discusses the contributions of Khaled M. Abou El Fadl in wrestling the text (al-ta’amul ma’a al-nash), which results in the implications of Islamic law. The contribution stems from his academic anxieties seeing the misogynist fatwas issued by official institutions such as the Council for Scientific Research and Legal Opinion (CRLO) in Saudi Arabia and The Society for Adherence to The Sunnah (SAS) in America. The fatwas that degrading the woman is regarded as the will of God who should not be appealed and debated. Khaled argues that the fatwa is an act of arbitrariness (despotism) and authoritarianism. By using library research and qualitative analysis, there are three results in this article. Firstly, the special group must obey the five prerequisites in order not to happen arbitrariness in interpretation and fall in authoritarianism, namely honesty, diligence, frankness, rationality, and selfrestraint. Secondly, the Qur’an competence in terms of authenticity differs from the hadith. The Qur’an is God’s authenticity. While the hadith, there are several inconsistencies that need to debate and implication on the thought of Islamic law. Thirdly, there are three elements that play a role in determining meaning in an interpretation, namely author, text, and reader. There is nothing most dominant among the three. The three relationships are given proportionally through the negotiation process, dynamic and participatory interactions in creating meaning.
Co-Authors Agus Widodo Anik Cahyowati Asyharul Muala Bustami Bustami Dani Amran Hakim Djazimah Muqoddas Habib Ismail Habib Ismail Khamim Khamim, Khamim Mochammad Najmul Afad Mutmainah Mutmainah Perdhiansyah, Perdhiansyah Rizky Adithya Sri Ayu Tiwikrama Sugianto Sugianto