Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Belo Altruis: Journal of Community Services
Erwin Ubwarin
Pattimura University
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pendidikan Anti Korupsi Bagi Siswa SMA di Kabupaten Maluku Tengah Erwin Ubwarin; Yonna Betrix Salamor; Wilshen Leatemia; Anna Maria Salamor
Altruis: Journal of Community Services Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): Altruis
Publisher : University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/altruis.v1i2.12160

Abstract

Indonesia will get a demographic bonus in 2045 with a hundred years in the country, which means high school students, are people who will be productive and occupy strategic positions in 2045, both in government and non-government fields, what if they life in 2045 is a corrupt generation. Then the aim of this service is to carry out the tri dharma of tertiary institutions and to foster an anti-corruption culture for students. Methods of activities by doing design thinking, and socialization. The results of this dedication, the formation of students who have mental anti-corruption and become agents of reform in high school. The changes that occur are they begin to be ashamed to cheat, do not take things that do not have them, form an honesty canteen.
Pretrial Dilemma and Main Case Examination Erwin Ubwarin; Firel Sahetapy
JURNAL BELO Vol 8 No 1 (2022): Volume 8 Nomor 1, Februari Tahun 2022
Publisher : Criminal of Law Department, Faculty of Law, Pattimura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/belovol8issue1page123-135

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the interpretation of the limits of the pretrial process and the start of the examination of the main case examination, often causing debates between judges, prosecutors, legal advisors and the defendant. The research method used is normative juridical. The results of the study show that there are two contradictions between the Constitutional Court Number 102/PUU-XIII/2015 and the Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 5 of 2021, which both provide different explanations regarding Article 82 paragraph (1) letter d of the Criminal Procedure Code, The Supreme Court Circular does not protect the defendants human rights by taking into account the due process model principle, because when the public prosecutor submits a case to the court, it is considered that the suspect's rights in the judicial process are automatically invalidated. In fact, if seen in Article 143 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the indictment is only a requirement for delegation, not reading the indictment at the time of the main case, and Article 79 and Article 80 clearly explain the protection of the rights of suspects and victims' rights in the pretrial process.
Co-Authors Anna Maria Salamor Firel Sahetapy Wilshen Leatemia Yonna Betrix Salamor