Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2019 - 2024
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dinamika Hukum Verity: Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional (International Relations Journal)
Umar Suryadi Bakry
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Faktor Kebudayaan dalam Teori Hubungan Internasional [The Cultural Factors in International Relations Theory] Umar Suryadi Bakry
Verity: Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional (International Relations Journal) Vol 9, No 17 (2017): January - June
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/verity.v9i17.574

Abstract

This article tries to explain some thoughts on the importance of cultural factors in the study of International Relations (IR).  The mainstream theories of international relations since the end of the World War II have ignored the role of cultural factors in world politics. But, after the Cold War era in 1990s, culture began to enter the center of research on international relations.  After the Cold War ended, cultural factors become particularly prominent and began to gain more attention from the scholars of International Relations. There are at least three prominent theories which are increasingly taking into account the role of cultural factors in international relations, that is, Huntington’s “clash of civilization” theory, Nye’s “soft power” theory, and constructivism theory. In addition, since the 1990s, many studies conducted by IR scholars have focused on the relationship between culture and the foreign policy of a country. The emergence of international culturology as a sub-field of IR studies further confirms that culture is an important variable in international relations.
SENGKETA KEPUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA PADA PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH DI KEMENTERIAN PERHUBUNGAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA Sirajuddin Sirajuddin; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Umar Suryadi Bakry
Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Hukum Vol 24 No 1 (2023): Edisi April 2023
Publisher : Universitas Stikubank

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35315/dh.v24i1.9306

Abstract

The tender process at the Ministry of Transportation uses an Electronic Procurement System (SPSE) and a supporting system where the final results in the application tendered by the Selection Working Group are only in the form of Minutes of Election Results (BAHP), which are then reported to the Commitment Making Officer (PPK). to be followed up in the form of a Letter of Appointment of Goods/Services Provider (SPPBJ) whether to accept the results of the Working Group or reject it. In the process of determining this, it turned out that there was a legal debate which resulted in legal uncertainty where the Selection Working Group's determination was in the form of BAHP as the result which was used as the object of the lawsuit. Meanwhile, the opinion of the other panel of judges is inversely proportional to the BAHP issue as the object of this dispute. Apart from that, administrative efforts before filing a lawsuit were also a problem where some of the Panel of Judges passed the dismissal stage and some did not. From the results of the study it was found that the determination of the object of dispute state administrative decisions on the procurement of government goods/services, especially at the Ministry of Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia, was normatively in the basic regulations regarding Government Procurement of Goods/Services, showing the decision to determine the winner of the Working Group in the form of BAHP even though it required approval with PPK can be used as th e object of dispute in disputes over state administrative decisions. In addition, the results also show that the explanations and decisions at the State Administrative Court, the administrative e arrangements for the procurement of goods/services are objections and appeals and a guarantee of 1% (one percent). Keywords: Procurement, goods/services, administrative decision.
Co-Authors Hedwig Adianto Mau Sirajuddin Sirajuddin