Okviani Assa Anggraini
Law Study Program, Faculty of Business, Law and Social Sciences, University of Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Juridical Review on Restrictions of Internet Access by Governments in Human Rights Perspective (Case Study of Jakarta Administrative Court Decision Number: 230/G/TF/2019/PTUN-JKT) Okviani Assa Anggraini; Emy Rosnawati
Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Vol 10 (2021): February
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (43.064 KB) | DOI: 10.21070/ijler.2021.V10.694

Abstract

This study aims to find out whether the judge's decision number 230/G/TF/2019/PTUN-JKT is in accordance with human rights regulations and also to find out whether internet access rights are part of human rights. The research method that the author uses is a normative juridical approach using a case approach or commonly known as the case approach. The conclusion of this study explains that internet access rights are part of Human Rights (HAM) because they both contain elements of freedom of expression and seek, convey and receive information without any restrictions. If there is a policy that limits internet access rights, then the policy is the same as limiting Human Rights and the policy can be said to be a violation of Human Rights. In decision number 230/G/TF/2019/PTUN-JKT, the Panel of Judges concluded that the actions of the defendants constituted a limitation on Human Rights (HAM) and that the action contained legal void so that the Panel of Judges decided that the action was against the law.