Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Faculty of Law, University of Jenderal Soedirman

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Notary Role in The Making of Certificate Buy and Sell Binding Agreement For Legal Certainty Astri Rubbih; Sulistyandari Sulistyandari; Rahadi Wasi Bintoro; Sanyoto Sanyoto
Authentica Vol 4, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2021.4.2.161

Abstract

The role notary in making the sale and purchase agreement deed and the deed of power to sell and sell not appropriate, so there is no legal certainty for the parties who enter into the agreement before the notary. Decision 1603K/PDT/2013, an agreement that was originally payable with a guarantee certificate, but the deed was made a sale and purchase agreement. This type of research is normative or doctrinal legal research. The results of the research and discussion show that the Notary Public does not carry out his role in accordance with the Law on Notary Position, namely not fulfilling the authentic deed making procedure, not reading the deed he has made. Legal consequences for Notaries who do not play the role of a notary according to the Notary Code of Ethics for the Honorary Council may impose sanctions on the Notary. Suggestions from a Notary Public authorized in making Deeds are obliged to implement the provisions of the Law on Notary Position and the code of ethics. The legal consequence for a notary should be that a notary who does not carry out his role has his license revoked.Keywords: Role of Notary, Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB), Power to Sell
The Role of Notaries in Making Sharia Banking Contract Deeds in Post-Constitutional Court Decisions Number 93/Puu-X/2012 Alun Windari Praptonowati; Sulistyandari Sulistyandari; Rahadi Wasi Bintoro; Suyadi Suyadi
Authentica Vol 4, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2021.4.2.155

Abstract

Notaries in the making of sharia contract acts are required to have an understanding of sharia contracts and laws. This study is to determine the application of the choice of forum in the settlement of Islamic banking disputes after the Constitutional Court decision Number 93 / PUU-X / 2012 concerning the Review of Law No. 21 of 2008 on Islamic Banking. As well as the role of the notary in making the Islamic banking deed and after the decision. The method used in this research is the normative legal method. There are three approaches used in this, as following: normative juridical research, namely the case, statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the research showed that after the issuance of Decision Number 93 / PUU-X / 2012, the settlement of Islamic banking disputes is an absolute authority within the Religious Courts (in litigation). This affirmation of the authority of the Religious Courts is supported by Perma Number 14 of 2016 concerning the Settlement of Sharia Economic Cases. The role of a notary in making sharia deeds must apply sharia principles in line with the Sharia Banking Law Number 21 of 2008 and it is important for a notary to have sharia certification so that its legality can be recognized. The role of the notary after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 93 / PUU-X / 2012 by stating that the settlement of sharia banking disputes is the absolute authority of the Religious Courts in making sharia deeds. In conclusion the Constitutional District Court is no longer authorized to resolve sharia economic disputes.Keywords: Sharia Contract, Choice of Forum, Role of Notary, Sharia Banking, Constitutional Court Decision Number 93 / PUU-X / 2012, Dispute
Notary Responsibility For Forgetting Description in Assets or Letters According To Positive Laws in Indonesia Reni Kurniawati; Budiyono Budiyono; Rahadi Wasi Bintoro; Hibnu Nugroho; Handri Wirastuti Sawitri
Authentica Vol 4, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2021.4.2.167

Abstract

Notary profession is prone to legal entanglement. This is because notary internal factors such as carelessness, not complying with procedures, not carrying out professional ethics and external factors such as the behavior of the community. This research is intended to find out and analyze the limitations of the element of letter forgery by Notary Public and Notary Accountability for falsification of information in deed or letter according to positive law in Indonesia. Normative juridical research methods. The data source is secondary data. The results of the study in the form of narrative text. Analysis of legal materials used is qualitative normative. The results of the study showed the limitation of the element of forgery of letters by notary public, can be seen in terms of the actions of the perpetrators and the harmed parties. There is an element of wrongdoing made by the perpetrators and the injured parties are the parties in the deed made by notary public. Notary Accountability for falsification of information in deed or letter according to positive law in Indonesia there are three, namely criminal, civil, administrative / ethical accountability. Notary should be careful in carrying out its work so that there are no mistakes and harm to the parties so that it can cause sanctions in the form of accountability.Keywords: Notary, Letter Falsification, Accountability 
The Long Stages of Becoming a Notary in Indonesia Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Authentica Vol 4, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2021.4.2.296

Abstract

Cover Note on the Perspective of Notary Authority Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Authentica Vol 5, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2022.5.1.297

Abstract

Subject and Object Rahadi Wasi Bintoro
Authentica Vol 5, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2022.5.1.299

Abstract